<p>The government already spent $741 billion on defense in Fiscal Year 2021.</p><p>The legislators asked Biden "to reject demands from many on the left to cut or freeze defense spending at current levels." Instead, they asked that he "continue the progress made under the Trump administration to rebuild our military by requesting a 3 to 5 percent increase over the inflation adjusted FY21 enacted level."</p>
<script id="3d14008d7e044c36b256c61ff82728bb">
if(cnxFlag){
cnxFlag=false;
cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: '5573e7ba-804a-4971-a00f-3e2eeec6c0a9'
}).render('3d14008d7e044c36b256c61ff82728bb');
});
}
</script>
<p>The letter was signed Rogers and Reps. Michael Turner (OH), Doug Lamborn (CO), Rob Wittman (VA), Vicki Hartzler (MO), Elise Stefanik (NY), Trent Kelly (MS), and Jim Banks (IN).</p>
<div class="inarticle_ad_placeholder" data-aa-adunit="/5931858/NatMemo_RM/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" data-aaad="true"></div>
<div class="video-container" id="videoCont" style="display: none;"></div>
<div id="vid"></div>
<p>Every one of the eight <a href="https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202149" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">voted</a> on Saturday against Biden's $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan.</p><p>Hartzler <a href="https://hartzler.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/hartzler-opposes-legislation-massive-price-tag" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">explained</a> her opposition as being based on fiscal responsibility. "By pushing this bill through Congress in the name of 'relief,' we are recklessly gambling with our future while expanding our national deficit by trillions," she said, adding "now is not the time to go further in debt by passing wish-list pork for the Speaker disguised as 'COVID relief.'"</p><p>Banks <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJimBanks/status/1362082450520817664" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">objected</a> to the bill as well on those grounds as well, predicting that every American's "share of the national debt would rise by $6,000" and average wages would decline.</p><p>With a record debt of more than <a href="https://www.usdebtclock.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">$28 trillion</a> and an estimated 2020 deficit of over <a href="https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-us-news-financial-markets-financial-crisis-government-spending-93908e048926fa4d0506ac1215887cf4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">$3 trillion</a> — plus an ongoing pandemic — progressives are urging <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-biden-defense-spending/biden-will-struggle-to-cut-defense-spending-despite-pressure-idUSKBN285359" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">cuts</a> to the defense budget.</p><p>Though all eight Republicans have long been backers of military spending, they have also attempted to present themselves as deficit hawks, committed to balancing the budget and reigning in the growing national debt.</p>
<div class="inarticle_ad_placeholder" data-aa-adunit="/5931858/NatMemo_RM/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" data-aaad="true"></div>
<p>A spokesperson for Banks said in an email that he has <a href="https://banks.house.gov/uploadedfiles/final_rsc_fy_2020_for_print.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">proposed</a> a five-year balanced budget plan, which would include enough in offsets to cover this increase. Spokespeople for the other lawmakers did not immediately respond to an inquiry for this story.</p><p>But Wittman is a <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-joint-resolution/3/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22:%5B%22balanced+budget+amendment%22%5D%7D&s=1&r=1&overview=closed&searchResultViewType=expanded" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">co-sponsor</a> of a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget and <a href="https://wittman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2687" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">wrote</a> in 2019 that "The longer we fail to address our nation's spending problem, the harder it becomes to solve the problem of our country's crippling debt."</p><p>Rogers <a href="https://mikerogers.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=187" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">said</a> in 2011: "This debt will be more than just a heavy burden we will place on the backs of our children and grandchildren."</p><p>Hartzler <a href="https://hartzler.house.gov/blog/potus-fy17-budget-numbers" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">called</a> in 2016 for "a budget that balances, puts Americans' priorities first, and truly addresses the enormous debt racked up after years of failed top-down policies from [the Obama] administration."</p><p>Banks <a href="https://banks.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=458" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">said</a> in 2019: "Our exploding federal debt is one of the gravest national security threats facing our Nation and has the potential to significantly harm future generations of Americans."</p><p>Just last month, Kelly <a href="https://trentkelly.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5191" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">urged</a> "we must do everything in our power to eliminate wasteful spending and seek ways to reduce the national debt," adding that as a member of the Budget Committee, he looked forward "to implementing fiscally conservative solutions to government spending."</p><p>And <a href="https://lamborn.house.gov/issues/budget-and-spending" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Lamborn</a>, <a href="https://stefanik.house.gov/issues/spending-cuts-and-debt" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Stefanik</a>, and <a href="https://turner.house.gov/issues/budget" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Turner</a> each have sections on their official website issue pages about their commitment to deficit and debt reduction.</p><p>In 2017, seven of the eight also <a href="https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2017699" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">voted</a> for Donald Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which slashed tax rates for corporations and billionaires while adding about <a href="https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53787" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">$1.9 trillion</a> to the deficit over ten years.</p><p>Stefanik <a href="https://stefanik.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/stefanik-oppose-final-tax-bill" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">opposed it</a> because it reduced a state and local tax deduction, impacting New Yorkers.</p><p><em>Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.</em></p>From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Keep reading...
Show less