The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Federal Reserve policy makers face a tough challenge on Wednesday as they conclude a two-day meeting with a decision on whether to scale back their stimulus program.

The launch of the “taper” — reining in its $85 billion a month bond-buying program — has been expected since May, when Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said it was likely as long as the economy continues to grow steadily.

The Federal Open Market Committee, which Bernanke leads, went as far as to predict the whole “quantitative easing” program would be wound up by mid-2014.

At that time, the economy would be fairly strong and the jobless rate near 6.5 percent. So the Fed could start “normalizing” monetary policy — that is, begin raising interest rates off their near-zero levels, finally putting the 2008-09 Great Recession behind.

But economists say the details in economic data and a challenging policy environment should tell the FOMC to keep the stimulus in place, or not go further than a token stimulus cut.

For one, indicators suggest the economy may have slowed since the second quarter’s 2.5 percent pace, and that part of the cause could be cuts in government spending.

In addition, more spending cuts are scheduled. And the White House and Congress are on the edge of a tough fight over the coming year’s budget and raising the debt ceiling that could generate more uncertainty in the economy.

“If you think about the balance of risks, this is a bad time to be doing anything that looks like a tightening of monetary policy,” said economist Paul Krugman in the New York Times.

The expectation of a policy shift has already sent market interest rates higher, and the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury bond has nearly doubled in four months, from 1.6 percent to 3.0 percent.

That has been perhaps more than the FOMC expected in communicating its intentions. It has pushed up U.S. loan rates, with data suggesting that has already slowed consumer spending and home buying — potentially stifling the recovery in the broader housing sector.

That was borne out in fresh data Tuesday from the National Association of Home Builders, whose builder confidence index held steady in September after months of gains.

“While builder confidence is holding at the highest level in nearly eight years, many are reporting some hesitancy on the part of buyers due to the sharp increase in interest rates,” said NAHB chairman Rick Judson.

In addition, jobs data announced on September 6 proved a disappointment. The economy generated a middling 169,000 net new jobs in August, and the data for the previous two months was revised sharply lower.

Nevertheless, the unemployment rate fell again, to 7.3 percent.

But that was more because of a rise in the number of people dropping out of the jobs market altogether. The participation rate in the work force fell to 63.2 percent, the lowest level since 1978.

Even so, it put the jobless rate on track to fall to 7 percent by year-end and, by next year, close to the 6.5 percent level that the FOMC has already set as its threshold for normalization: taking monetary policy off its five-year crisis footing by raising interest rates.

Critics say the Fed needs to focus not on the unemployment rate but the number of labor market dropouts, which points to continued hardship in households.

The FOMC has already essentially committed itself on tapering its stimulus, suggested Shushanik Papanyan at BBVA Research.

But, with the mixed picture for the economy, the first taper will be small, and the Fed will stress that it continues to support the economy, he said.

“The Fed will sneak in a $5 billion Treasury purchase decrease,” he said.

But “Fed policy communication will emphasize continuance of the asset purchases rather than focusing on the taper.”

Photo Credit: AFP/Saul Loeb

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}