The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Jonathan Spicer and Ann Saphir

NEW YORK/MILWAUKEE (Reuters) — Two influential Federal Reserve policymakers on Friday reinforced Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s message that an interest rate hike is coming by year’s end. =

Meanwhile one of the Fed’s most dovish policymakers appeared to soften his opposition to that timing, a subtle shift that could pave a smoother way to the Fed’s first rate hike in nearly a decade.

To be sure, New York Fed President William Dudley and Dennis Lockhart of the Atlanta Fed, speaking separately in New York, appeared doubtful they would be have enough information in hand to lift rates by an Oct. 27-28 policy meeting, suggesting the Dec. 15-16 meeting is more likely. They also clearly left the door open to waiting until 2016 if it looks like the U.S. economy is threatened by a global slowdown.

“Based on my forecast, yes I am” expecting to raise rates this year, said Dudley, a close ally of Yellen who has a permanent vote on policy.

“But it’s a forecast, and we’re going to get a lot of data between now and December. So it’s not a commitment,” he said on CNBC TV. “There certainly is a risk that the economy evolves in a very different way than I expect, and obviously it would be totally inappropriate for me to not take that into consideration.”

Chicago Fed Chief Charles Evans, who has long said he views waiting until mid-2016 a more “appropriate” approach, for his part downplayed the importance of the timing of liftoff so long as the Fed takes rates up very slowly.

“The precise timing for first increase in the federal funds rate is less important to me than the path the funds rate will follow over the entire policy normalization process,” he said, suggesting the rate may need to still be below 1 percent by the end of next year.

The central bank held off on a rate hike last month in the face of a slowdown in China and elsewhere, financial market turbulence and falling commodity prices. All of those could keep U.S. inflation, now at 1.3 percent, below the Fed’s 2 percent target.

Since then, disappointing September jobs growth has caused investors to sharply discount an October rate hike, and to give a December move about a 40 percent probability, based on futures markets.

Lockhart, a well-respected centrist and a voter on the Fed’s monetary policy committee this year, said the international slowdown and last month’s weak U.S. jobs report show there is “a touch more downside risk” to the U.S. economy.

Therefore, he said, the Fed will need to monitor the strength of the consumer in coming weeks and months to decide whether to go ahead with the first rate hike in nearly a decade.

“The economy remains on a satisfactory track and … I see a (rate) liftoff decision later this year at the October or December FOMC meetings as likely appropriate,” Lockhart said of the policy-making Federal Open Market Committee.

“However the data are giving off varied signals, and there is more ambiguity in the current moment than a few weeks ago,” he added at a Society of American Business Editors and Writers conference. This “calls for especially diligent monitoring of incoming data with particular attention to consumer activity.”

The latest reading on the world’s largest economy, a slight drop in U.S. import prices last month, suggested on Friday that the rate of imported deflation is slowing.

A Fed rate hike would reverberate through financial markets globally, depressing foreign currencies and possibly sucking more capital out of emerging markets in particular.


Dudley said “it’s possible” that the Fed could begin hiking later this month, though he questioned whether data between now and then would give it confidence.

Lockhart, who like Dudley and most other Fed officials once expected a rate hike around mid-2015, noted that the Fed would have more information on inflation, the labor market and consumer activity by December. But he too kept a move in October on the table.

“I hope to avoid the trap of letting one or two months’ specific data overly influence my outlook for the economy overall,” he said. “The ambiguity of the moment reinforces the need to closely watch the vital signs of the economy over the coming weeks to determine if the outlook has changed.”

(Reporting by Jonathan Spicer; Editing by Meredith Mazzilli)

Photo: William C. Dudley, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, attends the Economic Club of New York Leadership Excellence Award in New York April 21, 2015. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Dr. Mehmet Oz

Sean Parnell, the Trump-anointed candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania, dropped out of the race a week ago after a custody hearing that featured lurid details of his relationship with his ex-wife. Laurie Snell alleged that Parnell had struck her, choked her, left her by the side of the road and hit one of their sons hard enough to leave a welt on the boy's back. Parnell countered that she had invented all of it.

Custody battles are infamous for exaggerated accusations and heated denials, and it's difficult for outsiders to know whom to believe and how much. But Parnell's comments off the witness stand didn't burnish his credibility. Appearing on Fox Nation, for example, Parnell opined, "I feel like the whole 'happy wife, happy life' nonsense has done nothing but raise one generation of woman tyrants after the next." He wasn't finished. "Now there's an entire generation of men that don't want to put up with the BS of a high-maintenance, narcissistic woman." Well. Someone seems to be dealing with anger issues. The would-be — er, rather, won't-be — senator concluded with a short sermon on biology: "From an evolutionary standpoint, it used to be, you know, women were attracted to your strength because you could defend them from dinosaurs." Where does the GOP find these geniuses?

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}