The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

France Threatens To Cancel Military Ship Deal With Russia

By Kim Willsher and Henry Chu, Los Angeles Times

PARIS — Hinting at tougher sanctions to come against Moscow for its moves toward annexing Crimea, France said Tuesday it could cancel a $1.3 billion deal to sell Russia two state-of-the-art warships.

At the same time, the British government announced it was suspending military cooperation with Moscow. And Vice President Joe Biden, on a hastily planned visit to Eastern Europe, warned of additional penalties on top of the asset freezes and travel bans slapped on more than two dozen Russian and Crimean officials by the United States and the European Union on Monday.

In Paris, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Moscow’s incursion into the Crimean peninsula could jeopardize a controversial deal — opposed by the U.S. when it was signed three years ago — to supply Russia with two advanced Mistral ships. The Mistral is a multi-use vessel whose rapid sea and land assault capabilities have led to the French navy nicknaming it the “Swiss Army knife” of the sea.

Fabius acknowledged that shelving the contract would have negative economic consequences for France and said his country should not be expected to suffer alone. Paris wants a coordinated effort by the 28 EU nations, whose leaders will meet Thursday to consider further sanctions against Moscow.

“If Putin continues doing what he’s doing, we could envisage canceling the sales,” Fabius told television station TF1 on Tuesday. “But we will ask others, and I’m thinking namely the British, to do the same with the assets of the Russian oligarchs in London. Sanctions have to be shouldered by everyone.”

Such sanctions would bump up the EU to what it describes as the third level in a three-tiered process of punishing Russia for its aggression in the strategically important Crimean peninsula, which the West insists still belongs to Ukraine.

Fabius’ remarks appear to mark a change of direction by the government of French President Francois Hollande, who said only last week that his nation would honor its “signed contract” regarding the warships.

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin responded to Fabius’ remarks by warning on Twitter that “France is starting to undermine confidence in it as a reliable provider in the very sensitive sector of military and technical cooperation.”

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said his country was putting military cooperation with Russia on ice, including arms exports.

In a speech in the British Parliament, Hague slammed Putin’s decision to annex Crimea after Sunday’s vote there on seceding from Ukraine, a referendum that the West regards as an illegitimate exercise conducted at gunpoint. Hague dismissed Putin’s declaration that Moscow was simply reclaiming “an integral part of Russia” that had been wrongly deeded to Ukraine in 1954 after centuries under Russian rule.

“No amount of sham and perverse democratic process or skewed historical references can make up for the fact that this is an incursion into a sovereign state and a land grab of part of its territory with no respect for the law of that country or for international law,” Hague told lawmakers.

The annexation of Crimea has jangled the nerves of former Soviet satellite countries, such as Poland and the Baltic nations, that joined NATO after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In a last-minute trip to Warsaw on Tuesday, Biden warned that “Russia’s political and economic isolation will only increase if it continues down its current path, and (Moscow) will in fact see additional sanctions by the United States and the EU.”

AFP Photo/Jewel Samad


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ }}