The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

LOS ANGELES (AFP) – Michael Jackson’s dismal public image in his final years meant his final concert series had no sponsors, despite record advance ticket sales for the 50 planned shows, a witness said.

The testimony of Eric Briggs, of FTI Consulting, on Monday opened the 14th week of the Jackson family’s lawsuit against concert promoters AEG LIve.

The King of Pop’s mother, Katherine, and his children, are suing AEG for negligence, blaming the company for causing his death in 2009.

They accuse AEG Live of pushing Jackson too hard as he rehearsed in Los Angeles for the “This is It” comeback concert series in London and of negligently hiring doctor Conrad Murray to look after him.

Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in 2011 over Jackson’s June 25, 2009 death from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol, administered to help the 50-year-old singer with chronic insomnia.

They are demanding $1.5 billion in damages — the amount their expert estimates Jackson would have earned from the concert and a worldwide tour if he had lived.

But Briggs, a defense witness, argued against this estimate Monday at the Los Angeles Superior Court.

He emphasized that the pop icon’s image had deteriorated greatly in the years leading up to his death on June 25, 2009 — so much so that no company agreed to sponsor his final tour — even though the 50 London shows sold out within hours.

“Brand companies appreciate artists [that] can be great performers, but that doesn’t mean they want to put their names next to the performers,” Briggs said.

According to him, Jackson’s image rebounded somewhat in the 1990s, but it plummeted again in 2003 for several reasons, most notably the accusations he molested young boys.

For big-name labels, Jackson was a risk, because new scandals could emerge without warning, Briggs explained, and “brands are looking for predictability.”

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

John Eastman

Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters

The ABC, CBS, and NBC morning and evening news broadcasts have all ignored the revelation that one of then-President Donald Trump's lawyers authored a memo laying out how Trump could effectively pull off a coup.

John Eastman, a member of the conservative legal establishment who worked with Trump's legal team as the then-president sought to overturn the results of the 2020 election, wrote the document in the days leading up to the January 6 counting of electoral votes. His plan lays out various ways then-Vice President Mike Pence and congressional Republicans could use that

Keep reading... Show less

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

It remains to be seen whether or not President Joe Biden's $3.5 trillion "human infrastructure" plan — which includes federal funding for health care, education, child care and combating climate change — will ultimately make it to his desk to be signed into law. The $3.5 trillion price tag is drawing resistance from Republicans as well as centrist Democrats like Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. But 17 economists, all Nobel Prize recipients, have signed a letter endorsing the plan, which members of the Biden Administration see as crucial to his Build Back Better agenda.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}