The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) has aggressively gone after his critics with defamation lawsuits — five of which are still active— targeting Twitter, CNN, McClatchy, a Republican political strategist, satirical social media accounts, and others. But as local paper The Fresno Bee reported on Saturday, it’s unclear where Nunes is getting the funding for these lawsuits.

It noted that while Nunes himself seems to largely live on his salary as a Congressman, and his wife is a school teacher, he appears to have no trouble affording multiple high-profile lawsuits that likely cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The one lawsuit that he has already dropped after a few weeks, which Nunes brought against a man who accused him of being a “fake farmer,” cost $3,400, according to Federal Election Commission records cited by the outlet.

But the ongoing lawsuits’ costs will surely run far beyond that price tag, and yet the Bee could find no documentation for their funding.

“Nunes would have to set up a legal defense fund to accept free legal services or to receive money from a benefactor,” the report noted. “Members of Congress have strict rules against receiving generous gifts, with some exceptions for family.”

McClatchy has reported that Nunes has no such fund currently, which could pose a danger to him if it turns out he is receiving the funds from an unauthorized source. The Bee said that some have speculated that Peter Thiel, the right-wing billionaire who has previously supported a major lawsuit that financially ruined the outlet Gawker, is behind Nunes’ suits. But there does not seem to be any evidence for this claim.

There is another possibility the outlet considered, though. It noted that Nunes could get away without paying his attorney, Steven Bliss, if they had an agreement that the lawyer would be compensated only after the cases resulted in monetary damages being awarded. That way, Nunes could permissibly get the legal work done upfront for free.

Lee Berlik, a defamation attorney not working for Nunes, suggested to the Bee that this was a plausible explanation:

“It would not surprise me if Nunes’ lawyer was handling these cases for free or on a contingency basis,” Berlik said. “He’s getting a lot of free publicity – people are learning his name.”

However, it’s hard to imagine that many if any of Nunes’ lawsuits will be successful. And even if Nunes won some monetary award, it’s far from clear the amount would provide Bliss enough compensation to justify all the work being done.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Marchers at January 22 anti-vaccination demonstration in Washington, D.C>

Back when it was first gaining traction in the 1990s, the anti-vaccination movement was largely considered a far-left thing, attracting believers ranging from barter-fair hippies to New Age gurus and their followers to “holistic medicine” practitioners. And it largely remained that way … until 2020 and the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As this Sunday’s “Defeat the Mandates” march in Washington, D.C., however, showed us, there’s no longer anything even remotely left-wing about the movement. Populated with Proud Boys and “Patriot” militiamen, QAnoners and other Alex Jones-style conspiracists who blithely indulge in Holocaust relativism and other barely disguised antisemitism, and ex-hippies who now spout right-wing propaganda—many of them, including speakers, encouraging and threatening violence—the crowd at the National Mall manifested the reality that “anti-vaxxers” now constitute a full-fledged far-right movement, and a potentially violent one at that.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}