The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.


While Trump and his Republican enablers continue their ridiculous smear campaign against federal law enforcement and attempts to undermine the Russia probe, another 12 Russian intelligence officials have now been indicted.

A statement from special counsel Robert Mueller’s office detailed the charges.

“A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment today against 12 Russian nationals for their alleged roles in computer hacking conspiracies aimed at interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections,” special counsel Robert Mueller’s office said in a statement.

Eleven of the defendants are charged with “conspiracy to commit computer crimes, eight counts of aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to launder money.”

The damning indictment includes this detail, which will be of particular concern to Trump and his inner circle:

On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, wrote to a person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, “thank u for writing back . . . do u find anyt[h]ing interesting in the docs i posted?” On or about August 17, 2016, the Conspirators added, “please tell me if I can help u anyhow . . . it would be a great pleasure to me.”

Trump and his team have repeatedly insisted that no one in the campaign had any contact with Russia. According to the latest indictment, that isn’t true.

Prior to Friday’s indictment, the Mueller investigation has already racked up five guilty pleas, 23 indictments, and a total of 75 charges.

During a press conference Friday, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said he had briefed Trump on the indictment — and the fact of further evidence that Russian intelligence operatives did indeed try to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

Despite his briefing, however, Trump made clear Thursday that while he would ask about election meddling in his upcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin, there wasn’t much he could say or do about it.

“I’m meeting with president Putin on Monday, and I think we go into that meeting, not looking for so much,” Trump told reporters Thursday.

Asked what Trump would do if Putin again denies Russia interfered in the election, Trump answered, “Well, he may, I mean look, he may. What am I going to do? He may deny it, it’s one of those things. All I can do is say ‘Did you?’ and ‘Don’t do it again,’ but he may deny — you’ll be the first to know, OK?”

Before leaving for his trip abroad, Trump again publicly defended Russia against election meddling charges.

“Russia continues to say they had nothing to do with Meddling in our Election!” he tweeted and then launched into yet more criticism of the FBI.

Russia tried to affect the outcome of the 2016 election, and it did so to install Trump in the White House. That’s something the entire intelligence community has concluded. It’s something the Mueller investigation, which isn’t even finished yet, has shown through its many indictments.

Despite the overwhelming evidence, Trump continues — even while traveling abroad — to insist that’s it’s all a “hoax” and a “witch hunt,” taking the word of Putin over the word of American intelligence experts and law enforcement.

Published with permission of The American Independent.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less


YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}