The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice once recounted how her grandfather experienced a spiritual revelation. When he lacked the money to fulfill his dream of graduating from Stillman College, he was told he could get a scholarship — but only if he wanted to become a Presbyterian minister. "That's just what I had in mind," he replied.

Other Americans are hoping that religion can offer them a way to fulfill one of their cherished dreams: avoiding vaccination for COVID-19. They are claiming that they should not have to be inoculated because their faith forbids it.

This assertion didn't help a nurse at the Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center who lost her job for declining the vaccine because of her "sincerely held religious beliefs." Kaiser Permanente responded with a polite version of "give me a frickin' break." Said its chief medical officer, "We believe that misusing the religious exemption to avoid vaccination is disrespectful to those with sincere religious beliefs, and could violate the ethical standards we expect our employees to meet."

Federal civil rights guidelines advise employers to accommodate the religious obligations of their workers, but it doesn't compel them to be gullible saps. Companies are entitled to insist that employees provide persuasive evidence that they are acting on the iron imperatives of faith rather than personal whim.

Marshalling such evidence won't be easy. No major faith bars its followers from being immunized against disease. Even Jehovah's Witnesses, which rejects blood transfusions, and Christian Science, which discourages medical treatment, don't forbid it.

A lot of the holdouts have never claimed religious objections to other vaccines. Most, it's safe to say, couldn't articulate any halfway plausible rationale to refuse.

The San Diego nurse, Victoria Jensen, admitted she had gotten other vaccinations. For this one, her excuse was, "God speaks to me clearly." Funny — God tells me she's making that up.

On Thursday, the Biden administration issued a vaccine mandate for workers at companies with 100 or more employees and for health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. Those mandates, unfortunately, allow religious exemptions, which promise nothing but trouble.

Employers who choose to accommodate religious exemptions face a dilemma. If they try to verify each claim, they have to investigate subjective matters on which they have no expertise. If they accept all claims, they invite every phony and crank to escape a basic measure needed to protect those around them. It would make more sense for the administration to simply forbid such exemptions.

That's not exactly a radical idea. Mississippi is one of the most conservative states, and one of the most churchgoing. But since 1979, it hasn't allowed parents to get religious exemptions from the vaccinations required for kids to attend school. Thanks to this policy, it leads the nation in childhood inoculation rates.

Nor is the federal government or any state obliged to grant such accommodations. In 1990, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution's guarantee of religious freedom doesn't mean believers are exempt from laws that apply to everyone else.

To rule otherwise, the court said, would lead to "religious exemptions from civic obligations of almost every conceivable kind — ranging from compulsory military service to the payment of taxes" and, yes, "compulsory vaccination laws." The author of the court's majority opinion? Conservative hero Antonin Scalia.

In some instances, it's fair and humane not to penalize people for practicing their faith — say, by denying unemployment benefits to someone fired for refusing to work on the Sabbath or by imprisoning committed pacifists for refusing military induction.

But even in those cases, it makes no sense to wave through anyone who says the magic words. The burden should be on those requesting an exemption to show that their objection is sincere, consistent and rooted in religious principles.

When it comes to the COVID-19 shots, though, the number of people who could legitimately qualify is too tiny to be worth the bother. Besides, the need to combat the spread of a virus that has already killed 5 million people around the world is grave enough to overrule even authentic religious qualms, if there is such a thing.

Some people who feel entitled to behave in a grossly selfish manner that endangers others claim the Almighty has granted them permission. But that doesn't mean the rest of us should.

Follow Steve Chapman on Twitter @SteveChapman13 or at To find out more about Steve Chapman and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at

Photo credit: spencerbdavis1 at Pixabay


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}