The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

In a joint rally in Portsmouth, New Hampshire Tuesday morning, Bernie Sanders gave a full, hearty endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s bid for the White House. There wasn’t much beating around the bush: Sanders recited his usual stump speech, pre-empting each point with language like “Hillary and I are in agreement that…” and “Hillary Clinton understands that…”

The substance of Sanders’ speech was no different than any other campaign stop. It was an excoriation of corporate greed, environmental destruction, regressive taxes, educational and health care debt, and nativism. Absent, though, were any associations between Clinton and Wall Street, a staple of the tone of his campaign in primary season.

In a written statement to supporters on his Facebook page, Sanders thanked them for turning his long-shot campaign into a cultural movement, saying that it was “extremely important that we keep our movement together, that we hold public officials accountable and that we elect progressive candidates to office at the federal, state, and local level who will stand with us.” He listed the work his and Clinton’s campaigns had done bringing their platforms closer together, and underlined the importance of her election over Donald Trump.

“But none of these initiatives will happen if we do not elect a Democratic president in November. None!” he wrote of his progressive agenda as a candidate. Sanders pledged he would be “actively campaigning throughout this election season to elect candidates who will stand by our agenda”

Clinton, for her part, seemed ready to talk up at least some of Sanders’ progressive campaign. “We need to go big, and we need to go bold. this isn’t a time for half measures!” she said, before outlining an progressive economic platform including “saying no to the assault on the right to organize and bargain collectively” and “bad trade deals and unfair trade practices including the Trans-Pacific Partnership.” (This even though Clinton’s representatives on the Democratic platform committee, perhaps under pressure from the Obama administration, blocked Sanders representatives’ attempts to officially oppose the TPP.)

She also expanded on a central point of Sanders’ platform — lessening the impact of Citizens United by requiring the full disclosure of donors to political campaigns, a fairly mainstream idea; establishing a small donor matching system, which would have helped Sanders’ campaign quite a bit earlier this election; automatically registering 18-year-olds to vote and requiring that polling places meet standards for wait times and accessibility.

“These aren’t just my fights, these are Bernie’s fights,” Clinton said. “And I feel with all my being that these are fights we have to win together.”

Clinton concluded by reaching out to the Sanders supporters outside of the Democratic mainstream. “Let’s open the doors to anyone who shares our values,” she said. “You will always have a seat at the table when I am in the White House.”

For most Democrats, Sanders endorsement tied together a tough primary battle between two different wings of the party, one that pitted Clinton’s pragmatism against Sanders’ idealism. For Republicans, and some Sanders supporters in the #NeverClinton camp, the speech could never have been anything but Sanders giving into to systematic pressure to “fall in line.”

No matter how ringing the endorsement, and it was pretty ringing, the subtext of Sanders’ endorsement was inevitable: He lost in pledged delegates, super delegates, and the popular vote. And no matter if he did find endorsing Clinton so distasteful as to betray his supporters (that’s not to say he did), Sanders would have faced a simple choice: Endorse, or wreak havoc.

Still, Clinton isn’t know as a “deal-maker” for nothing: The reputation that marked her as an “establishment” political player in a decidedly anti-establishment year could have convinced Sanders that Clinton was willing to take on a sufficient amount of his core issues, including establishing a free college tuition (for families with incomes under a national limit) and announcing, at least in this speech, her opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

The real question now: Will we see Sanders in some position of leadership in the 115th Congress? 


Photo: Democratic U.S.  presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders stand together during a campaign rally where Sanders endorsed Clinton in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, U.S., July 12, 2016.  REUTERS/Brian Snyder


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}