The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Cambridge (United States) (AFP) – Republican lawmakers endorsed in principle the legalization of millions of undocumented immigrants on Thursday, but stopped short of backing a pathway to citizenship.

The majority party in the House of Representatives did, however, specify that it backs opportunities for young immigrants brought to the country illegally by their parents to become U.S. citizens.

Most experts agree the Republicans’ low level of support among voters of recent immigrant stock cost their candidates badly in recent elections, and the party is under pressure to reach out.

But many within the party ranks fear that passing legislation to help regularize the situation of millions of undocumented migrants could hurt them with voters from their white conservative base.

At a retreat for Republican representatives under the leadership of House Speaker John Boehner to set priorities ahead of November’s mid-term elections, members drew up an outline approach.

“There will be no special path to citizenship for individuals who broke our nation’s immigration laws – that would be unfair to those immigrants who have played by the rules and harmful to promoting the rule of law,” said the draft, obtained by reporters.

The draft said such immigrants “could live legally and without fear in the U.S. but only if they were willing to admit their culpability, pass rigorous background checks, pay significant fines and back taxes.”

The one-page “Standards of Immigration Reform” is a only Republican messaging document in a mid-term election year.

But it may also represent the beginning of a thaw in a contentious issue of a deeply divided Congress.

The principles call for improved border security and revamping the country’s outdated visa and employment verification programs.

But it still leaves House Republicans at odds with President Barack Obama and the U.S. Senate.

The upper chamber last year passed a bipartisan immigration bill that included a 13-year pathway to citizenship for the more than 11 million people in the United States living in the shadows.

Boehner assured members behind closed doors that the House would not take up “or engage in negotiations with the Senate” on that measure, but stressed that step-by-step reform was important.

“The safety and security of our nation depends on our ability to secure our border, enforce our laws, improve channels for legal entry to the country, and identify who is here illegally,” Boehner said

A pro-Republican pressure group, the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles praised the plan as better than Obama’s, and noted that it did not close the door to citizenship.

“If those who legalize want to become citizens, they need to follow the process established by current law,” said Alfonso Aguilar, who worked on citizenship issues for former president George W. Bush.

The main US rights group, the American Civil Liberties Union, welcomed the Republicans’ step forward, but complained that it does nothing to tackle injustices in current immigration system.

“To lock up people in deplorable prisons and detention facilities, deny them a right to a lawyer or even a hearing before they are imprisoned or deported is inhumane,” it said.

The political group spearheading pressure from reform, the DREAM Action Coalition — which is behind Obama’s plan — gave a guarded welcome to the rival idea, but said it would wait to see any bill.

Some lawmakers are resisting calls from Boehner and senior party leaders to move on immigration, and the party must decide whether to risk an internal fight before November’s congressional elections.

Boehner said that new strategies on immigration as well as fiscal issues were signals that Republicans were recalibrating as the party of the “alternative,” rather than just the opposition.

Paul Ryan, the Republican vice presidential candidate in 2012 who is seen as a bridge between House leadership and conservatives, underlined the reluctance to provide what many in his party have come to refer as “amnesty” for millions of immigrants.

“I do not think we should have a special path to citizenship for the undocumented immigrants,” Ryan said. “That’s why the House has long said we’re going to do it our way.”

AFP Photo/Jim Watson


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}