The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Seoul (AFP) – South Korea and the United States have mapped out a new strategy to counter the growing threat of a North Korean nuclear or chemical weapons attack, their defense ministers said Wednesday.

They also agreed to review the sensitive issue of when Seoul should assume operational wartime command over their combined forces in South Korea.

Visiting U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the new pact signed with his South Korean counterpart Kim Kwan-Jin established a “strategic framework” for dealing with “key North Korean nuclear threat scenarios” in the wake of its third atomic test in February.

Although neither side provided details, Kim said the plan — which is certain to be condemned by North Korea — would “greatly enhance” the alliance’s deterrence capacity.

Observers said it was largely a confidence-building measure to underline Washington’s support for Seoul against any provocation from Pyongyang.

South Korea is protected by the US nuclear umbrella and there are currently nearly 30,000 U.S. troops stationed in the country.

But Seoul insists that the alliance must respond to what Kim described as the “vastly different” security situation on the Korean peninsula following the North’s nuclear test.

To that end, it has requested an extension of U.S. wartime command over South Korean troops — currently scheduled to end in 2015.

In case of war with North Korea, the alliance at present calls for the U.S. military commander to lead American troops deployed to the country, as well as South Korea’s 640,000-strong force.

Seoul argues that the transition to South Korean command should be postponed until the nuclear threat from Pyongyang has been neutralised.

Washington has indicated it wants to keep to the original schedule, but Hagel said he had listened “very seriously” to Seoul’s concerns and promised further consultations on the issue.

“We are very optimistic we will have an agreement,” he added.

At a joint press briefing with Kim, Hagel also stressed that the new deterrent strategy covered all the North’s weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons.

According to South Korean defence officials, North Korea has up to 5,000 tonnes of chemical arms — an alleged stockpile that has been highlighted by the use of such weapons in Syria.

“There should be no doubt that North Korean use of chemical weapons would be completely unacceptable,” Hagel said.

The North’s nuclear test in February — its third and most powerful to date — triggered months of heightened military tensions on the Korean peninsula.

Pyongyang threatened pre-emptive nuclear strikes against South Korea and the United States, while the Pentagon responded by deploying nuclear-capable B2 stealth bombers during joint military exercises with Seoul.

And in March, Seoul and Washington signed another pact providing for a joint military response even to low-level provocation by North Korea.

Tensions have since eased, but acute concerns remain over the North’s nuclear weapons programme after satellite image analysis suggested it had expanded its production of weapons-grade fissile material.

“North Korea has increased its threat clearly against South Korea, and against the United States. It has increased its capability,” Hagel said.

But he also noted that South Korea’s military has grown “stronger, more professional and more capable” over the past decade.

On Tuesday Hagel had attended the South’s largest military parade for a decade, which showcased a new cruise missile capable of pinpoint strikes anywhere in North Korea.

The parade was condemned as “an unprecedented display of lunatic hostility” by North Korea, which also lashed out at the entire U.S.-South Korea military partnership.

The alliance has “brought nothing but continued division, the deterioration of North-South relations and the increasing danger of a nuclear war”, the ruling party newspaper Rodong Sinmun said.

Hagel flew on to Tokyo in the early evening, where he will be joined later by Secretary of State John Kerry.

The two men will meet their Japanese opposite numbers for discussions on the Washington-Tokyo alliance and regional security, a defense official said.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}