The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

dpa

BANGKOK — Thailand’s junta chief, Prayuth Chan-ocha, on Friday defended an interim constitution put in place earlier this week.

Critics have been quick to raise concerns about specific articles that increase the regime’s unchecked authority, including giving it veto powers and the ability to enact laws and decrees outside the constitutional framework.

“As long as power is used for good, there is no need to worry,” Prayuth told the nation in his weekly televised address.

He went on to question a widespread desire for democracy, when he said it had demonstrably failed.

Prayuth pointed out that the country is currently at peace, in contrast to civil unrest and protests that marred the nation when a democracy existed.

“Nevertheless, the junta will continue to work towards democracy,” he added.

The general also stressed that no human rights would be violated in dealing with refugees from Myanmar.

The junta had earlier stated that they would begin repatriating Burmese refugees who had been living in Thailand for the past three decades.

Photo via WikiCommons

Interested in world news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Wandrea "Shaye" Moss

YouTube Screenshot

Just who deserves protection in America?

If you observe the folks this country chooses to protect and chooses to ignore, you may get an answer that doesn’t exactly line up with America’s ideals.

Keep reading... Show less
YouTube Screenshot

The First Amendment reflects a principled but shrewd attitude toward religion, which can be summarized: Government should keep its big fat nose out of matters of faith. The current Supreme Court, however, is not in full agreement with that proposition. It is in half agreement — and half is not enough.

This section of the Bill of Rights contains two commands. First, the government can't do anything "respecting an establishment of religion" — that is, sponsoring, subsidizing or providing special favors for religious institutions or individuals.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}