The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

 

President Donald Trump has frequently scorned the United Nations, leaving his pragmatic UN Ambassador Nikki Haley to smooth over the rough spots as he rejected policies identified with his cerebral predecessor, Barack Obama.

The United Nations is made up of a lot of foreigners (and that’s the point); yet, Trump has stressed “America First” to the UN General Assembly, the world’s primary multilateral forum, most recently in September. This prompted Sweden’s foreign minister, Margot Wallstrom, to comment: “This was a bombastic nationalistic speech. It must have been decades since one heard a speech like that in the UN General Assembly.”

Despite constant talk of bankrupting the United Nations, especially for peacekeeping, Nikki Haley made sure there was no “slash and burn” action—yet. She took credit for some budget reductions that were negotiated with the UN Secretary-General and Europeans. And she is known for withering condemnations of Presidents Vladimir Putin of Russia and Bashar al-Assad of Syria.

But the bombardment by a Saudi-led coalition of civilians in Yemen is not high on the list of criticisms by the United States—or other Western nations since Iran is supporting the rebels.

Still, the Trump administration has injured the United Nations through relatively minor cuts that can add up. It withdrew from the Human Rights Council, cut financing to Palestinian refugees, and quit the UN population fund (UNFPA) as well as the cultural agency UNESCO. It also threatened all UN agencies and programs if they ever uttered the word “abortion” regardless of circumstances.

The White House started its negative initiatives by pulling out of the 2015 Paris agreement on climate change, which commits nations to take action against the earth’s rising temperatures. The United Nations has supplied some of the startling research on air, water and land pollution. Only the United States seems to reject the science.

The Trump administration also seems to see no value in participating in international conferences. The United States withdrew from a global compact on “handling flows of migrants and refugees, describing it as a subversion of American sovereignty” as the administration initiated horrific procedures on the southern border.

Then there is the Iran nuclear deal, which Trump denounced regularly even if he understood little of it. Nikki Haley joined him on all denunciations of Iran, which may be forced to take some action or live under increased U.S. sanctions.

A senior State Department official told a news conference in June that it was pushing allies to cut all imports of Iranian oil by November 5. The U.S. recently left the door open to possible exemptions. The deal was negotiated over two years and was supported by all 15 Security Council members.

Actions to defend Israel from what Washington sees as a chronic bias resulted in leaving the Human Rights Council, which investigates crimes all over the world and will make U.S. goals more difficult to achieve. Ironically, the rejection of the Council came just as the world was horrified at the separation of children from parents at the southern border.

Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as the Israeli capital, a decision that was to have been left to a final peace treaty, resulted in anti-U.S. resolutions in both the Security Council and the General Assembly. So did U.S. opposition to any resolution on the strife in Gaza.

The UN relief agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA, says the Trump administration has committed only $60 million this year rather than the $360 million the United States donated last year. Christopher Gunness, spokesman for UNRWA, said 25 donors had “fast-tracked” their contributions, raising $238 million earlier than expected. But it still leaves the agency $217 million short of funds it needs. “We never had such a large shortfall,” Gunness told this reporter.

This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Evelyn Leopold is a veteran United Nations correspondent, the chair of the Dag Hammarskjöld Fund for Journalists and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. She is a writing fellow at the Independent Media Institute.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Despite Pro-Choice Ruling, Supreme Court Still Threatens Abortion Rights
Despite Pro-Choice Ruling, Supreme Court Still Threatens Abortion Rights

New Hampshire has long had a history of supporting abortion rights, but that's changed. Now, clinics that provide abortion in the state are being denied funding, and Republican Gov. Chris Sununu — who claimed to be "pro-choice" when he ran for re-election in 2018 — signed into law the first abortion ban in the state's history last month.

The move to undermine funding for clinics that provide abortions began last year, when New Hampshire's Executive Council, which must approve all state contracts, added an audit provision for clinics that receive money from the state's family planning program. The council alleged, despite much evidence proving otherwise, that state funds were being used for abortions at places like Planned Parenthood, which is illegal in New Hampshire.

Keep reading... Show less
#EndorseThis: Lindell Loses It When CNN Says His 'Proof' Is 'Completely Ridiculous'
#EndorseThis: Lindell Loses It When CNN Says His 'Proof' Is 'Completely Ridiculous'

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is now claiming that some financial institutions no longer want to do business with him because he poses a "reputation risk" as he continues to push former President Donald Trump's false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

On Friday, January 14, Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon's podcast "War Room" where he claimed "Heartland Financial and Minnesota Bank and Trust are attempting to 'de-bank' him over concerns that they could face fallout related to having him as a client," Newsweek reports. During the broadcast, the two right-wing enthusiasts played an audio recording of what they claim was a discussion between Lindell and a banking official.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}