The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Douglas Hanks, The Miami Herald

MIAMI — In the wake of national outrage over alleged police misconduct in Ferguson, Mo., Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez on Thursday vowed to make “body cameras” mandatory for all county patrol officers.

His proposed budget calls for purchasing 500 of the mini cameras, enough to outfit about half of Miami-Dade’s patrol force. Made by Taser, they’re small enough to snap onto a pair of glasses or a hat in order to record everything an officer sees.

“I want a camera on every police officer,” Gimenez told the audience at a budget town hall meeting in Little Haiti.

Gimenez’s strong words put Miami-Dade, one of the largest local governments in the country, on the forefront of a national debate over police cameras in the wake of the Ferguson shooting of an unarmed teenager by an officer. Days of unrest followed, with protesters alleging homicide and authorities saying they didn’t yet have enough evidence to pass judgement. Civil-liberties activists have raised concerns about a police force essentially filming every civilian they come in contact with.

Referring to Ferguson, Gimenez told an audience of about 50 people that “I think if there had been a camera, a lot of what happened could have been avoided.” Later, he added: “Police officers, everyone once in a while may step out of line. But there also are a lot of frivolous allegations against them.”

Aside from the national discussion, Gimenez’s push for police cameras comes at a delicate time for him on the law-enforcement fund. He’s in the midst of an increasingly bitter fight with the police union, which has slammed his budget for proposing job cuts for law enforcement. In a statement, police union president John Rivera said the union had a “pending” grievance involving the body-camera issue and said, in part “if an officer has to worry about yet another function, that second or two to activate [the camera] might cost them their life.”

Even so, Rivera suggested the union might not protest the cameras, once fully briefed on the technology. “It’s premature to say whether we will object or not,” the statement read. “We need answers…”

Next year’s budget calls for spending $1 million on police body cameras, with another $400,000 in operating costs tied to the devices and the data storage required. Though they record automatically, the cameras run on a loop to conserve memory. Officers must activate the save function when encountering a civilian in order for the footage to be preserved long-term, county police officials said.

Gimenez said he has been pushing the police department for the last two years to purchase the cameras, and that he instructed police brass at a staff meeting Thursday to get every officer equipped with one as soon as possible. He said the Ferguson incident added to the urgency.

“I think cameras on every police officer will actually reduce the number of complaints about excessive force,” he said.

Juan Perez, the deputy director of the Miami-Dade police force, said a test of the products earlier this year already produced positive results. After a deadly high-speed chase, investigators found rescue workers had left a crime technician unable to reproduce how a victim died. One of the responding officers was wearing a camera on his shirt collar, and investigators were able to see the bodies undisturbed before paramedics began treatment.

“This is a way of evidence collection that didn’t exist in the past,” Perez said.

At the town hall, Ernst Jean Lewis, editor of a local Creole newspaper, questioned why Gimenez would spend on new equipment while planning to cut back on actual police-officer posts. “Should homeowners suffer a break-in, could you provide that homeowner with a camera to provide protection?” he asked through a Creole translator.

AFP Photo/Mat Hayward

Interested in national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

For nearly 50 years, the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling has protected a woman's right to an abortion. It also protected many politicians' careers. Lawmakers who opposed abortion knew that as long as abortion remained available, pro-choice voters wouldn't care much about their positions on the matter.

That would be especially true of suburban mothers. Once reliable Republican voters, they have moved toward Democrats in recent elections. If the GOP wants them back, forcing their impregnated high schoolers to bear children will not help. If Roe is overturned, more than 20 states are likely to make abortion virtually illegal, as Texas has done.

Keep reading... Show less

Justice Brett Kavanaugh

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments over a Mississippi law banning abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. The law roundly defies the court's decisions affirming a right to abortion, but the state portrays the ban as the mildest of correctives.

All Mississippi wants the justices to do, insisted state solicitor general Scott Stewart, is defer to "the people." The law, he said, came about because "many, many people vocally really just wanted to have the matter returned to them so that they could decide it — decide it locally, deal with it the way they thought best, and at least have a fighting chance to have their view prevail."

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}