The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard professor and consumer advocate who played the lead role in establishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that is at the centerpiece of last year’s Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, is officially exploring a run for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts.

Her website is live and she has reportedly been meeting with Democratic activists around the state in recent weeks.

Warren is a darling of progressives who appreciate her no-nonsense approach to the banks and lenders at the heart of the financial crisis.

She would be attempting to unseat Scott Brown, the freshman Republican who was swept into office with Tea Party support but has voted like a moderate; he supported the Dodd-Frank bill, for one, and has good approval numbers.

“The hurdles are people remembering the last Democratic nominee was [Attorney General] Martha Coakley, and obviously there are some similarities between the two, and so getting over the stigma of a rematch with a similar profile Democrat” is an issue for Ms. Warren, David Paleologos, director of the Political Research Center at Suffolk University in Boston, told The National Memo.

He called her winning the campaign a “daunting task” in light of Scott Brown’s strong numbers against a lot of other Democratic icons in the state — who have far better name-recognition than Warren does.

“She doesn’t have a geographic base,” he added, unlike a lot of the other state and local officials considering runs. He said the nature of redistricting following last’s year census would be important to her hopes in the Democratic primary, as well as the turnout in the state’s most progressive areas — Cambridge, Newton and Brookline among them.

“If…there are intense fights in the progressive precincts, she’s the windfall beneficiary. That helps her. Her strategy has to be: get what you can out of the non-progressive areas, and… run up big margins [in progressive territory].”

When it comes to the general election, with Barack Obama at the top of the ballot — he surpassed 60 percent of the vote in the state in 2008 — labor and the progressive community should well come out in force, and we ought not be shocked if he makes a stop or two in this safe-blue state next fall just to drive up turnout.

Warren won’t be able to accuse Brown of being a pawn of the banks (though he did press for exemptions for smaller and community banks from investment rules in the reform legislation), but she can say he’s a weak centrist without a clear ideological narrative or motif — for her, that’s protecting consumers from bad-faith actors in the financial community.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

President Joe Biden

The price of gasoline is not Joe Biden's fault, nor did it break records. Adjusted for inflation, it was higher in 2008 when Republican George W. Bush was president. And that wasn't Bush's fault, either.

We don't have to like today's inflation, but that problem, too, is not Biden's doing. Republicans are nonetheless hot to pin the rap on him. Rising prices, mostly tied to oil, have numerous causes. There would be greater supply of oil and gas, they say, if Biden were more open to approving pipelines and more drilling on public land.

Keep reading... Show less
Youtube Screenshot

Heat deaths in the U.S. peak in July and August, and as that period kicks off, a new report from Public Citizen highlights heat as a major workplace safety issue. With basically every year breaking heat records thanks to climate change, this is only going to get worse without significant action to protect workers from injury and death.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration admits that government data on heat-related injury, illness, and death on the job are “likely vast underestimates.” Those vast underestimates are “about 3,400 workplace heat-related injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work per year from 2011 to 2020” and an average of 40 fatalities a year. Looking deeper, Public Citizen found, “An analysis of more than 11 million workers’ compensation injury reports in California from 2001 through 2018 found that working on days with hotter temperatures likely caused about 20,000 injuries and illnesses per year in that state, alone—an extraordinary 300 times the annual number injuries and illnesses that California OSHA (Cal/OSHA) attributes to heat.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}