The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

What troubles swing voters the most about Mitt Romney?  We found out while conducting focus groups in Ohio and Pennsylvania several weeks ago, asking such uncommitted voters to discuss the economy and the presidential race in depth.

When we released that report in mid-June, titled Shifting the Economic Narrative, political reporters paid most attention to our critique of President Obama’s message on job growth and economic recovery — framing it as yet another  episode in the exaggerated conflict between “Clinton Democrats” and “Obama Democrats.”  But that coverage overlooked our findings about Romney’s real and growing weaknesses—in particular, his record at Bain Capital and preference for sheltering wealth in offshore accounts.

We’d traveled to Columbus and Philadelphia to conduct focus groups as part of our on-going Economy Project, seeking to hear from the all-important swing voters in these all-important swing states. It is one thing to measure candidates’ strengths and weaknesses on a poll;  it is quite another to watch and hear voters respond to the two candidates as the election unfolds.  What we learned about Romney—and how forcefully and negatively voters reacted—surprised even us, seasoned (*choke* old) campaign veterans.

We offered voters a list of positive, negative, and neutral facts about Romney.  Not surprisingly, they reacted positively to his record in Massachusetts, where he reduced the deficit without raising taxes.  But after reading that he “holds as much as $8 million in accounts in the Cayman Islands,” they lost all interest in the positive items.  Even his work saving the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics—an undoubtedly and near-universally positive fact about the ill-fated Romney—barely registered among participants.  They just could not get over Romney’s offshore stash.

“If you want to run for president of the United States, you better put every god damn penny in this country,” said one participant.  “How come nobody’s talking about this? It’s disgraceful… Talk about being out of touch with the way people are in the country today!   You’re not qualified to be President of this country,” added another.

This single fact about Romney  — his offshore holdings — is so powerful that it effectively re-framed his perceived strength as a successful businessman.  While participants initially thought his business experience was a strength, it became a weakness when reframed.

Why does this re-framing of Romney work?  It works because voters not only find Romney’s off-shore account reprehensible, which they do, but because it reinforces their existing concerns about him.  Even before saying anything or hearing anything about him, participants immediately volunteer that Romney is rich, out of touch, and in the pocket for Wall Street and big finance.  A typical remark:

[Romney will enact] policies that keep himself and his class where they are. There’s a certain – I think there’s a certain level when you get so high up the business where you’re making so much money that you don’t need where you just lose some of your humanity and you just don’t care. 

To these voters, Romney’s offshore account is the darkest side of wealth — it represents the failure of our market system to produce gains enjoyed by everyone.  Most importantly, it means special privileges not available to those in the middle class, who already feel they are bearing the burden of this slowly recovering economy.

Erica Seifert, Ph.D., is a senior associate at Greenberg Quinlan Rosner whose responsibilities include overseeing research for Democracy Corps.

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}