Tag: american red cross
Red Cross Failed Haiti In Time Of Need

Red Cross Failed Haiti In Time Of Need

When Haiti was wrecked by a monster earthquake in 2010, many heartsick Americans reached for their checkbooks.

It’s our national reflex after an international disaster. Seeing mass misery in a country so poor, we send money, hoping (and often assuming) it will be used to help those who need it most.

But the truth is, we don’t know what happens after the check’s in the mail. We pick a charity to trust, and sometimes we pick wrong.

Following the catastrophe in Haiti, one high-profile relief organization raked in more donations than any other — the American Red Cross, which collected nearly half a billion dollars. It was a windfall for the group, which had been struggling to wipe out a $100-million-plus deficit.

Among other things, the Red Cross promised to develop new communities in Haiti for the many thousands left homeless by the quake.

Five years later, exactly six houses have been built. No new communities have been constructed.

The agency’s efforts there have been scandalously sluggish, wasteful, and inept, according to a disturbing report filed last week by National Public Radio and ProPublica, an online investigative news service.

Unfortunately, it’s not the first case of high-stakes bungling by the Red Cross. After Hurricane Katrina, volunteers reported widespread improprieties and chaotic recordkeeping that resulted in the theft or “disappearance” of generators, air mattresses, rental cars, and relief funds.

The Red Cross defends its work in Haiti, yet refuses to release a detailed account of where and how all the donated money — about $488 million — has been spent.

Among the agency’s boggling and undocumented claims are that it provided housing for 130,000 people, and helped “more than 4.5 million” Haitians “get back on their feet” — a highly improbable feat, considering that the estimated population of the whole country was only 9.8 million at the time.

A few months ago, in a rosy summary timed to the fifth anniversary of the earthquake, Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern wrote: “Millions of Haitians are safer, healthier, more resilient, and better prepared for future disasters thanks to generous donations to the American Red Cross.”

Her assessment contrasts dramatically with the views of many Haitians and officials interviewed for the NPR/ProPublica investigation, which examined several ambitious-sounding Red Cross projects that fell apart.

In 2011, for example, the agency announced plans for a massive project to rebuild Campeche, an impoverished hillside neighborhood in Port-au-Prince that was pulverized by the quake. Seven hundred new homes were promised.

Four years later, nothing has happened. Residents of Campeche still live in tin shacks without safe drinking water, toilets or electricity. The only visible evidence of the Red Cross is a hand-painted logo on a wall.

Haiti has long been a sad, bottomless pit for aid money, and a frustrating place to work for international charity and health organizations. The politics is ever-shifting and sometimes violent, corruption is rampant, and in many cities the infrastructure is shaky or non-existent.

It would be impossible to add up all the well-intended dollars from foreign governments and relief agencies that have disappeared over the decades into the pockets of crooked Haitian bureaucrats. However, that’s not what doomed the Red Cross efforts there after the earthquake.

The organization made its own problems. It brought in foreign project managers who didn’t speak French or Creole (a rather serious obstacle), and hired few Haitians in senior positions. Project after project got mired in paperwork and confusion.

When cholera broke out nine months after the quake, a Red Cross plan to distribute basic soap to the population was delayed by “internal issues.” The epidemic, one of the worst in modern times, killed more than 8,000 people.

One thing the Red Cross excels at is promoting itself, not only during a catastrophe but in the aftermath.

Its boast of providing 130,000 homes to destitute Haitians makes it sound like they actually were given homes. Not so. That figure includes those who got short-term rental assistance, “transitional” housing in makeshift structures or simple training in “proper construction techniques.”

While the Red Cross advertises that 91 cents of every donated dollar is spent on actual relief efforts, it ended up distributing much of its earthquake money to other charities. They took their own cuts for expenses and administration.

Progress doesn’t come easy in Haiti, but it happens. Two of the organizations that produce life-saving results are Sean Penn’s J/P Haitian Relief Organization, which has relocated hundreds of homeless families, and Partners in Health, the heroic medical outreach program spearheaded by Dr. Paul Farmer.

The next time a disaster strikes somewhere, don’t feel anxious about reaching for your checkbook. It’s still the right thing to do.

Just be sure to pick a better charity than the American Red Cross.

(Carl Hiaasen is a columnist for The Miami Herald. Readers may write to him at: 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, FL, 33132.) 

Photo: United Nations Development Programme via Flickr

Four In Ten American Teenagers Support Other Countries Torturing American Troops

A new study from the American Red Cross reveals that 4 in 10 American teenagers believe foreign countries should be allowed to torture captured American troops. The study also found that 6 in 10 teenagers support America torturing foreign soldiers, and more than half believe it is justified for the US to kill foreign prisoners of war who have killed Americans.

Lawrence Tribe, a Harvard professor of constitutional law, believes that American teenagers are simply less able to empathize with American soldiers. “For young people,” he told The Daily Beast, “to put themselves in place of a soldier is a level of empathy that most people simply don’t have anymore.” Part of the reason may be the lack of a military draft and mandatory military service.

Legal scholars believe torture could just seem natural to a generation that came of age immediately after September 11th, when conservatives argued that torturing enemy combatants, even in violation of the Geneva Conventions, was necessary to protect the United States against terrorism. Isabelle Doust, the head of the humanitarian law division of the American Red Cross, told The Daily Beast that “over the past 10 years, they’ve been exposed to many new conflicts, but they haven’t been exposed to the rules.”

They also have not been exposed to the fact that torture is ineffective and counterproductive.

One irony was revealed in a striking study earlier this year from Brown University showing that enhanced interrogations may not even be an effective way to gather intelligence. Compared with traditional police questioning techniques like building rapport or offering positive reinforcement, the study found that torture more frequently alienates the subject, or produces unreliable information. The marquee example researchers point to is the Libyan detainee in 2002 who, under torture, claimed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, a major premise in launching the war in Iraq. [The Daily Beast]