The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Four In Ten American Teenagers Support Other Countries Torturing American Troops

A new study from the American Red Cross reveals that 4 in 10 American teenagers believe foreign countries should be allowed to torture captured American troops. The study also found that 6 in 10 teenagers support America torturing foreign soldiers, and more than half believe it is justified for the US to kill foreign prisoners of war who have killed Americans.

Lawrence Tribe, a Harvard professor of constitutional law, believes that American teenagers are simply less able to empathize with American soldiers. “For young people,” he told The Daily Beast, “to put themselves in place of a soldier is a level of empathy that most people simply don’t have anymore.” Part of the reason may be the lack of a military draft and mandatory military service.

Legal scholars believe torture could just seem natural to a generation that came of age immediately after September 11th, when conservatives argued that torturing enemy combatants, even in violation of the Geneva Conventions, was necessary to protect the United States against terrorism. Isabelle Doust, the head of the humanitarian law division of the American Red Cross, told The Daily Beast that “over the past 10 years, they’ve been exposed to many new conflicts, but they haven’t been exposed to the rules.”

They also have not been exposed to the fact that torture is ineffective and counterproductive.

One irony was revealed in a striking study earlier this year from Brown University showing that enhanced interrogations may not even be an effective way to gather intelligence. Compared with traditional police questioning techniques like building rapport or offering positive reinforcement, the study found that torture more frequently alienates the subject, or produces unreliable information. The marquee example researchers point to is the Libyan detainee in 2002 who, under torture, claimed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, a major premise in launching the war in Iraq. [The Daily Beast]

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}