Tag: chicago cubs
How Hillary Clinton Became A Hated Yankees Fan

How Hillary Clinton Became A Hated Yankees Fan

In my view, God invented baseball to provide a sanctuary from the fallen world of politics. I believe I’ve missed two televised Red Sox games this year. To me, the seven month major league season is the sporting equivalent of, say, Downton Abbeya complex, seemingly endless narrative filled with surprising events and unforgettable characters.

My earliest specific baseball memory is racing into the bathroom where the old man was shaving to tell him that the Giants’ Bobby Thompson had hit a miraculous ninth inning home run to defeat the Brooklyn Dodgers in a one game playoff. At first, Dad thought I’d imagined it. That was 1951, for those of you keeping score at home. However there are older home movies of me imitating the Dodgers’ Howie Schultz at age three.

It follows that baseball is both too important and too trivial to lie about. Even if your name is Hillary Clinton. But hold that thought.

Some years ago, I overheard my wife explain to a bossy woman friend why she allowed me to watch ball games on TV.

It went something like this:

“Well, if I told him he couldn’t, he’d do it anyway. He doesn’t tell me what I can watch on TV. Also, my Daddy was a baseball coach, so sometimes we watch games together. Do I ever get tired of it? Sure. But there are a lot worse habits a man can have. When Gene’s watching baseball, he’s home, he’s sober and he’s not out in some titty bar with the boys.”

Sorry fellows, but she’s taken. Having spent her childhood riding in school buses all over Arkansas and Oklahoma with wisecracking teenaged baseball players, Diane’s often the woman laughing when the others are gasping for breath.

In that she somewhat resembles, believe it or not, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. According to everybody who knew Hillary as a child, she was a passionate baseball fan. Her own father, a former Penn State football player, taught her early how not to swing like a girl.

At a 1994 White House picnic celebrating Ken Burns’ documentary film “baseball,” Hillary surprised onlookers by stepping into the batting cage and smacking a couple of pitches. The Washington Post covered the event, mentioning in passing that she’d always been a Chicago Cubs and New York Yankees fan—like many Chicagoans for whom hating the crosstown White Sox means loving their rivals.

(That’s basically how I came to the Red Sox. As a National League kid in New Jersey, Yankee-hating was in my DNA. Also, Ted Williams.)

Indeed, a 1993 Post profile of Hillary quoted childhood friends saying  that she’d been a walking encyclopedia of Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris lore—this before word went out among the Washington press clique that shaming her as the World’s Biggest Liar was the solemn duty of every ambitious pundit.

Now normal human beings take a person’s word about these things. But our esteemed political press corps, as Bob Somerby points out in a series of witheringly funny blog posts on this solemn topic, isn’t populated by normal people. Information and facts, he writes “no longer play a role in our discourse… It’s narrative all the way down! The children select a preferred group tale. Then, they all start reciting.”

And so they have on the topic of Hillary Clinton, baseball fan. The fun began in 1999, when the then-First Lady was contemplating running for the U.S. Senate from New York. She made the mistake of going on the “Today Show” and telling Katie Couric she’d always been a Yankees fan.

The host objected. Wasn’t she a Chicagoan and a Cubs fan?

“I am a Cubs fan,” Clinton said. “But I needed an American League team…so as a young girl, I became very interested and enamored of the Yankees.”

Without bothering to check his own newspaper’s reporting on this critical issue, a Washington Post “Style” reporter wrote that “a sleepy-eyed nation collectively hurled” at the surprising claim. The New York Times’ Kit Seelye dubbed it “a classic Clintonian gesture.”

And they were off to the races on the Sunday shows. Famous baseball fan George Will denounced what he called a “Clintonian lie, which is say, an optional lie and an embroidered lie.” He used the word “mendacity.” Jonathan Yardley pronounced it “a magnificent example of Clintonian vulgarity.” Ever obliging team-player Doris Kearns Goodwin used the word “sacrilege.”

And so it’s gone throughout Hillary Clinton’s public life. To my knowledge not one of these elaborately offended pundits has ever admitted error on this trivial, but telling theme. As recently as July 2016, New York Times columnist Gail Collins cited the troubling claim as evidence that Hillary Clinton is opaque and unknowable.

Examined closely, it’s amazing how many Hillary-the-liar claims follow a similar pattern. And they wonder why she’s iffy about holding press conferences.

Photo: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton listens to Vice-President Joe Biden speak as they campaign together during an event in Scranton, Pennsylvania, August 15, 2016. REUTERS/Charles Mostoller

@POTUS: Another Way To Attack The President

@POTUS: Another Way To Attack The President

Any high-profile person starting a Twitter account is news.

But when the president does it? Well, that’s something else entirely.

Who does he follow? Who is he talking to? Who’s tweeting at him? And how many of those tweets consist of threats and hate speech? (Unfortunately, a lot.)

@POTUS — not to be confused with @BarackObama, which is controlled by the group Organizing for Action — is the actual Twitter handle of the president.

So who is @POTUS following? Most of the 65 accounts he follows are government entities — the Treasury Department, Energy Department, Department of Veterans Affairs — and high-level administration officials, like Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewel, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker.

But he also follows his alma maters, Occidental College (1979-1981), Columbia University (1981-1983), and Harvard University (1988-1991); Chicago sports teams (Blackhawks, White Sox, Bears, and Bulls); and of course, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, and the White House.

Notably lacking? TheChicago Tribunepointed out that @POTUS was not following the Chicago Cubs.

Former advisor David Axelrod told the Tribune that the president has pledged his allegiance to the White Sox many times.

“Hey, say what you will, he’s consistent,” Axelrod said. “Once a Sox man, always a Sox man.”

The Sox’s senior coordinator of social media, Colleen Maxwell, told the Tribune that “it’s standard procedure” not to follow a rival when you’re a big fan of a particular team. “But if it was him [clicking to follow], it shows he knows the audience. He knows what he’s doing.”

@POTUS, which launched earlier this week, will have tweets coming exclusively from the president, the White House announced, as part of his ongoing effort to be transparent to the American public. The president immediately charmed with an exchange with former President Bill Clinton (whom he follows, along with the first President Bush):

Along with @FLOTUS and @VP, the @POTUS account will have new owners, presumably after the presidential inauguration in 2017.

However, in the five days since the account launched, @POTUS has been the recipient of racial slurs and hate speech. Since @POTUS’s bio says that tweets directed at the account can be archived — as is true of anyone whose tweets are part of official government business — it may not be advisable to tweet the president directly. The Secret Service monitors Twitter for threats, and they will go after someone they deem a credible threat.

Case in point: Jeff Gullickson of Minneapolis tweeted a doctored picture of the president with a noose around his neck, calling for his arrest. The Secret Service landed on his doorstep shortly after, TheNew York Timesreported.

Don’t presume that you can just use Americans’s favorite justification for everything, the First Amendment, as an excuse to make violent tweets against the president. As Hanni Fakhoury, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, toldThe Daily Dot, “the First Amendment does not protect true threats: any statement that conveys an intent to do harm or physical injury.” Tweeting threats to the president can land you in jail.

The BBC on Wednesday published its own comparison of world leaders’ Twitter accounts.

@BarackObama leads with more than 59 million followers, with the Pope in second place — although he has nine (!) different accounts, each in a different language, so that designation really needs an asterisk.

India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, is number three and Turkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is fourth. India’s huge population and Twitter’s popularity in Turkey accounts for their high standings.

@POTUS, as of this writing, has 2.33 million followers, although that number is sure to grow. Sysomos, a social media monitoring firm, published a blog post Wednesday analyzing the spread of @POTUS’s tweets and his audience. Only 38 percent of his followers identify themselves as coming from the U.S., with the U.K. making up 6.6 percent. (Over 27 percent is unidentified.) Sixty-five percent of his followers are male, with 35 percent female.

Photo: For some reason, it took six years for Barack Obama to do this. Image: @POTUS/Twitter