The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

The grim realities of the Iraq war, from its multi-trillion-dollar expense to its awful cost in American and Iraqi lives, were supposed to be mitigated by progress toward democracy in the Mideast – or so the neoconservative politicians and pundits who promoted the invasion have long told us. Now the credibility of that argument, which was never compelling, has been decisively undermined by the latest developments in Baghdad, where President Nuri Kamal al-Maliki is lending support to the Assad regime’s bloody repression of non-violent democracy protesters in neighboring Syria.

Troubling questions about the nature of the Shia parties that came to power following the fall of Saddam Hussein – and especially their relationship with the Iranian government — have long been voiced by critics of the war. Yet today, as Maliki and members of his ruling party openly attack the Syrian protesters while promoting economic deals with both Iran and Syria, those questions seem to have been answered. The Iraqi regime has delivered a verdict on the neoconservative justification for the war – and that verdict could scarcely be more negative.

When the Bush administration (and its enablers in academia and the media) began to promote an invasion of Iraq in 2002, neither they nor their opponents imagined the wave of democratic revolution that has crossed from the Maghreb to the Gulf nine years later – a movement utterly distinct from the failed neocon notion that bringing elections to Iraq by force would eventually reform the entire region. As former CIA analyst Paul Pillar noted in an excellent post on The National Interest blog, the movement that spread from Tunisia to Egypt to Bahrain and Syria drew no inspiration from Iraq – where the carnage and destruction of the American occupation did no service to the cause of liberty in the rest of the Arab world.

For neoconservatives, who continue to influence Republican legislators (and presidential candidates) today, the scalding irony is that rather than promoting the extension of freedom in neighhoring states, Iraq’s president and governing party have spoken out in oppositon to the democratic movement in Syria. Even as the Syrian military murders that country’s protesting citizens every day, Maliki maintains the warmest relations with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and a distinctly cold attitude toward the Syrian people, whom he has warned not to “sabotage” the regime. Since the protests began several months ago, the Maliki government has hosted official Syrian visits and encouraged construction of a natural gas pipeline across Iraqi territory from Iran to Syria. He has behaved, in short, more like an ally of Iran and Syria than of the United States – and certainly more like an ally of dictatorship than an advocate of democracy.

A report in the New York Times quoted a television interview in which Maliki blamed the demonstrators in Syria for the violence there, and urging them to use the democratic process rather than riots to express their concerns about the government. (Of course he knows that the “democratic process” is even more a sham in Damascus than in Tehran. ) Meanwhile politicians in Maliki’s party have gone still further, publicly smearing the protesters as instruments of Al Qaeda, which is Assad’s own false excuse for his massive killing spree. Such cynical mockery of the Arab Spring and its courageous Syrian upwelling is shameful, but the shame doesn’t belong to Maliki alone. It is a disgrace shared by the people who helped to bring him to power, not only in Iran but in Washington as well.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

When COVID-19 was overwhelming New York City hospitals during the 2020 spring, a silly talking point in right-wing media was that residents of red states didn't need to worry about the pandemic because it only posed a threat to Democratic areas. But COVID-19, just as health experts predicted, found its way to red states in a brutal way. And the current COVID-19 surge is especially severe in red states that have lower vaccination rates. Journalist David Leonhardt, in an article published by the New York Times this week, examines a disturbing pattern: red states where residents are more likely to be anti-vaxxers and more likely to be infected with COVID-19 and die from it.

Keep reading... Show less

Gov. Doug Ducey with Senate President Karen Fann and former President Donald Trump

The Republican-led Arizona election audit found that President Joe Biden actually won by a slightly wider margin than initially reported, but Trump supporters are still demanding that the election results be overturned.

In fact, according to, the demands have increased since the audit results were made public. Arizona's Republican Gov. Doug Ducey reportedly received approximately 300 emails a day on Saturday and Sunday demanding that he decertify the state's results for the 2020 presidential election.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}