The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Top U.S. Banking Regulator Sides With J.P. Morgan CEO

On the same day that J.P. Morgan paid more than $150 million to settle federal charges that it had lied to investors in 2007 about a mind-bogglingly complex mortgage product, a top U.S. bank regulator said he was “skeptical” of recent attempts to regulate the financial system.

“We have to be able to figure out how far is too far, and when to stop,” said Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh during a speech in London [pdf]. “I worry that the high capital requirements, liquidity requirements, and activity restrictions we are pursuing are attempting to banish all risk from the banking system.”

J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon recently said that capital requirements— limits on the amount of leverage a bank can take on– was a “reason” the economy was failing. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which Walsh runs, oversees 1,400 banks and generally takes a lighter approach to regulation.

Walsh also criticized the section in the 2010 financial reform bill known as “Volcker Rule,” which banned banks from using house money to make certain kinds of risky and complex trades.

“If we draw the circle too narrowly around what we call ‘banking,’ we will unnecessarily restrict legitimate banking activity and raise its cost,” he said.

Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan), who recently published a scathing 550-page report on Goldman Sachs’ machinations in the lead-up to the financial crisis, told the Financial Times that the Obama Administration needed to get rid of Walsh.

“It is past time for the president to nominate new leadership at the OCC to protect American families and businesses from the excesses of Wall Street.”

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}