The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Washington (AFP) – The powerful Senate Intelligence Committee green-lighted a measure Thursday that maintains U.S. spy agencies’ controversial authority to conduct dragnet data collection, but critics said it fell well short of much-needed reforms.

The legislation, if it passes both chambers of Congress, would mark the first reform of the nation’s surveillance laws since former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden made stunning disclosures this year about U.S. data collection practices.

The 11-4 vote — during a closed-door committee session — puts the measure on a collision course with other legislation introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives that would end bulk data collection outright.

The Snowden leaks disclosed that the National Security Agency (NSA) was scooping up phone and Internet data on millions of Americans, the vast majority of whom have no connection to terrorism.

It generated a wave of skepticism on both sides of the political aisle about the degree of secrecy that cloaks the programs and the court that reviews electronic and telephone surveillance requests, which critics say has failed to provide a check on the NSA’s eavesdropping powers.

Intelligence Committee chair Senator Dianne Feinstein insisted the FISA Improvements Act would increase citizens’ privacy protections as well as tighten oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, including requiring outside experts to review key court findings or interpretations of the law.

It would provide for prison terms of up to 10 years for unauthorized access to the collected data, and require an annual public report on the number of queries made against the NSA database and investigations begun as a result of the queries.

“The threats we face — from terrorism, proliferation and cyber attack, among others — are real, and they will continue,” Feinstein said in a statement after her committee voted 11-4 in favor of the bill. “Intelligence is necessary to protect our national and economic security, as well as to stop attacks against our friends and allies around the world.”

Critics blasted the legislation as a fig leaf draped over a larger problem.

“Unfortunately, the bill passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee does not go far enough to address the NSA’s overreaching domestic surveillance programs,” Senator Mark Udall, who voted against the legislation, said in a statement.

“I fought on the committee to replace this bill with real reform, and I will keep working to ensure our national security programs show the respect for the U.S. Constitution” that he said his constituents demand.

Udall backs the bill introduced by Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, which would put a stop to the bulk data collection and introduce a “special advocate” who works to assure individual privacy and civil liberties.

Senator Ron Wyden, who for years has sought to rein in the surveillance, predicted a long battle ahead, telling reporters his top priority was ending surveillance “on millions and millions of law-abiding Americans.”

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, left, and former President Donald Trump.

Photo by Kevin McCarthy (Public domain)

In the professional stratum of politics, few verities are treated with more reverence than the outcome of next year's midterm, when the Republican Party is deemed certain to recapture majorities in the House and Senate. With weary wisdom, any pol or pundit will cite the long string of elections that buttress this prediction.

Political history also tells us that many factors can influence an electoral result, including a national crisis or a change in economic conditions — in other words, things can change and even midterm elections are not entirely foretold. There have been a few exceptions to this rule, too.

Keep reading... Show less
x

Close