Tag: james franco

Movies That Deserved Best Picture Nominations

Oscars academy awards

By Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

When it comes to the Oscar endgame — winning, losing, or just being in the running — it’s all about the numbers: the votes cast, promotion dollars spent, red carpets walked, interviews granted, pounds lost.

The most confusing count this year — and every year since 2011 — might be the number of movies nominated for best picture. In 2009, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences doubled the number of nominees from five to 10. Two years later, the rules were adjusted to allow more flexibility, and the academy has been increasingly flexible ever since. Nine films were nominated in each of the three years that followed, but this year only eight movies will contend for the academy’s most coveted award.

Why didn’t the academy use all 10 best picture spots?

Oscar experts like my colleague Glenn Whipp can go on about the ins and outs of the academy’s preferential voting and how a best picture nominee must get at least 5 percent of the early votes. Others say it just wasn’t a great year at the movies.

I disagree. Those blank spaces represent missed opportunities. Two chances for the academy, oft-criticized for conventional thinking, to be bold and surprising, to broaden the “best picture” umbrella and reconsider the category for a new age.

There are many years I would not only commend the members’ restraint, I would send along my sympathies, knowing how creatively bleak some years can be — how barren of interesting films, how boring.

But 2014? Hardly the case. It was a very good year, with wonderful surprises. From massive to mini, mainstream to indie, the movies were a delicious stew to be savored — for challenging topics, flights of fancy, sheer entertainment value.

Yes, the year brought its share of duds. Even more fell into that terrible mid-range we call mediocre. Of the eight that made the A-list — American Sniper, Birdman, Boyhood, The Grand Budapest Hotel, The Imitation Game, Selma, The Theory of Everything, and Whiplash — most deserve their place without question, and they represent a refreshing range of styles.

A couple, however, are enough on the bubble — American Sniper carried in on the back of Bradley Cooper’s performance, The Theory of Everything pushed over the biopic pro-forma line by Eddie Redmayne’s remarkable renderings — to make the two unfilled spots even more glaring.

Since the academy didn’t choose to choose, I will.

Here are the 2014 films that I feel should have been contenders at Sunday’s ceremony for Oscar’s top prize. They are the best movies that didn’t get a best picture nomination.

Image: Davidlohr beso, Flickr

most-violent-year

A Most Violent Year

This is a film with the kind of pedigree the academy usually embraces — and for good reasons. J.C. Chandor’s penetrating story is set in the crime-ridden New York City of 1981. A mob-defying Abel Morales is the good guy played with quiet calculation and exceeding care by Oscar Isaac. His wife, Anna, is a mob baby grown good, given an edgy gum-smacking verve by Jessica Chastain. The film didn’t hit theaters until the very end of the year. Screenings for awards-season glitterati came late as well. Perhaps that sealed this fast-forgotten film’s fate; for the most part, the movie has barely registered.

Ida

Ida

Border-crossing should happen more often. This foreign language nominee is so exceptional it deserved consideration alongside Hollywood’s best. Polish director Pawel Pawlikowski’s stirring story of religion, identity, and faith is one of the more idiosyncratic cuts at the Nazi legacy to emerge. A Catholic novitiate named Ida, orphaned as a baby and raised by nuns, is asked to visit with her only surviving relative before she takes her vows. Her journey, depicted with stunning cinematography, is a soul-wrenching one. The performances by Agata Trzebuchowska as the title character and Agata Kulesza as her estranged aunt are searing. As the young woman discovers she is Jewish by birth, orphaned by the Catholic family who killed hers for their farm and the Nazi mentality that gave them the license, the very idea of the god one prays to is contemplated.

Nightcrawler

Nightcrawler

The inclusion of this provocative outsider would have moved the academy beyond its comfort zone. But deserving? Yes. Rarely has Los Angeles seemed seedier than the crime scenes caught by the lens of a serial shooter. Conjured up by writer-director Dan Gilroy, it gave us one of those memorable characters who crawls under the skin so deeply he is impossible to shake. Jake Gyllenhaal’s Lou Bloom, a freelance videographer trolling for shots of blood and guts that can be sold to the local TV news, is hungry in every sense of the word. Though the 30 pounds the actor lost added to the eerie look, it is his portrayal of an insatiable appetite for success that unnerves. The effect of Lou’s unblinking ambition is riveting. Between Gyllenhaal’s stirring acting and Gilroy’s scary telling, the film is psychologically chilling in just the way a well-crafted, Hitchcockian thriller should be.

Guardians of the Galaxy

Guardians of the Galaxy

Very risky business for the academy to go so light, you may be saying. Au contraire. Though Guardians — part science fiction, part spoof — puts it about as far outside the academy’s best picture box as one could imagine, qualitatively director James Gunn’s aim was true. I realize it is not one of those quote-unquote prestige pictures, but the movie was extremely smart, well-constructed, well-acted, and absolutely entertaining, due in large measure to the engaging Chris Pratt as its charming space jockey and a wise-cracking animatronic raccoon (voiced by Bradley Cooper). Rarely do films we love enough to see again and again make it in. Guardians was a real chance go with a rule-breaker and show that the academy is open to taking the not-so-serious films more seriously.

The Interview Seth Rogen James Franco

The Interview

Even riskier business would be the bizarre case for considering The Interview. With its farcical faux plot against North Korea’s parody-perfect leader Kim Jong Un, the silly Seth Rogen and James Franco slapstick became the most significant movie of the year. Not on the quality scale, mind you. No high IQ scores either. But thanks, or no thanks, to a very touchy foreign tyrant, The Interview became a symbol of free speech in America and the current poster child for squashing cyber-bullying rather than being merely a bad movie. I’d slip it in as No. 5 on my list, but I figure I’m already pressing my luck.

(c) 2015 Los Angeles Times, Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

‘The Interview’ Opens, And Directors Are Thankful

‘The Interview’ Opens, And Directors Are Thankful

By Josh Rottenberg, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

LOS ANGELES — Capping weeks of tumult over the Seth Rogen-James Franco comedy The Interview, the film finally began to be shown in 331 independent theaters nationwide just after midnight on Christmas Eve. One of the first showings in Los Angeles, a sold-out 12:30 a.m. screening at the Cinefamily Theater, included a surprise appearance by co-directors Rogen and Evan Goldberg.

“You are the best,” Rogen told the crowd. “We thought this might not happen at all.”

Rogen and Goldberg had been largely out of the public eye for over a week since Sony Pictures first canceled the release of the movie — which centers on the assassination of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un — after a crippling cyberattack tied by U.S. officials to North Korea. At the eleventh hour, Sony made deals to distribute the film to independent theaters and a video-on-demand platforms, including YouTube and Google Play.

The directors were eager to take a public victory lap.

“The fact that it’s showing here and you guys all came out is super … exciting,” Goldberg said.

Sony had initially planned a wide Christmas Day release for the film in about 3,000 theaters, until the nation’s major exhibitors dropped it after a hacking group calling itself Guardians of Peace threatened violence against moviegoers. Buffeted by criticism from President Barack Obama, among many others, the studio put together a patchwork release unprecedented for a major studio movie.

It remains to be seen how much revenue Sony will be able to draw from the film, particularly given that it is already being widely pirated online. But given that for a few days it looked like it may not be released at all, Rogen and Goldberg were clearly relieved that audiences were getting a chance to see it on the big screen.

“If it wasn’t for theaters like this, and people like you guys,” Rogen said, “this literally would not be … happening.”

AFP Photo

Endorse This: ‘The Interview’ Is Here!

Endorse This: ‘The Interview’ Is Here!

endorsethisbanner

This movie may or may not launch a new Korean War — but dang it, Sony is triumphantly releasing its Kim Jong-Un assassination comedy The Interview online, starting today, in the face of threats by hackers allegedly working on behalf of the totalitarian tyrant.

Click above to watch this victory for freedom and democracy — and bad taste — and then also click above to share this video!

Video viaThe Interview/Sony Pictures.

Get More to Endorse Delivered to Your Inbox

[sailthru_widget fields=”email,ZipCode” sailthru_list=”Endorse This Sign Up”]

Sony Wrestles With How To Market ‘Interview’ Amid Geopolitics, Scandal

Sony Wrestles With How To Market ‘Interview’ Amid Geopolitics, Scandal

By Steven Zeitchik and Amy Kaufman, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

Stern security guards kept a close eye on guests. Stars were kept away from the press. And the usual red carpet fanfare was largely eliminated.

When Sony Pictures held the premiere for its controversial new North Korea-themed comedy, The Interview, in downtown Los Angeles on Thursday night, it avoided many of the trappings of a Hollywood premiere.

The muted affair hinted at a larger paradox surrounding the Christmas release of The Interview: How does a studio release a movie with the requisite hoopla when everything about it is more fraught than festive?

Sony Pictures’ The Interview, directed by Seth Rogen and longtime collaborator Evan Goldberg, centers on a CIA plot to kill North Korean leader Kim Jong Un via a bumbling American talk show host, played by James Franco, and his producer, played by Rogen. But what could have been a silly romp has turned into something much more serious.

North Korea, which sees The Interview as part of a propaganda war by the West, has been condemning the film since the summer — at one point an official called it “an act of war” and vowed revenge. In recent weeks Sony has been hit by a devastating cyberattack that some law enforcement officials believe North Korea orchestrated as a retaliatory act. The hacking continues to expose embarrassing emails from top executives and has shaken the insular culture of Hollywood.

In the process, the controversy shows what happens when powerful forces in Hollywood and geopolitics collide — when a company is caught between wanting to support its filmmakers’ edgy vision but, as a subsidiary of a large corporate conglomerate, also must weather the fallout.

Sony Pictures executives apparently were concerned about The Interview before North Korea began protesting the film this summer, engaging in an internal debate over issues such as release date, publicity talking points and the nature of the film itself that grew more heightened as the controversy boiled over.

According to newly disclosed emails reviewed by The Times after the cyberattack, a top studio executive worried about the film’s original release date of Oct. 10 last May, a month before North Korea began protesting the movie.

“Whether intentional or coincidence, we are releasing The Interview on 10/10/14 — one of the most important national holidays in North Korea, which is the anniversary of the establishment of the Worker’s Party,” Keith Weaver, the executive vice president of worldwide government affairs for Sony Pictures, wrote to the company’s general counsel Leah Weil on May 20. (The release date was changed to Aug. 7, and for reasons that the studio said publicly were related to a bigger platform on Christmas.)

An email between Japanese and Australian Sony executives on June 23, before the controversy began to bubble up, also noted that the movie posed an issue for Sony Corp’s top executive.

“Mr. Kaz Hirai, CEO, was very much concerned about this film especially when the Japanese government is negotiating with the North Korean government regarding the returning of the kidnapped Japanese to Japan,” Noriaki Sano wrote to Stephen Basil-Jones, referring to the long-running showdown over at least 13 Japanese citizens and noting that Hirai and Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton had spoken.

Sony declined to comment for this story on the emails and the marketing plans for The Interview.

The first signs of a North Korean backlash to The Interview occurred on June 20, when the head of a group known as the Center for Korean-American Peace, Kim Myong-chol, criticized the movie in an interview with the Daily Telegraph. It began to take shape in earnest on June 27, when North Korea’s U.N. ambassador, Ja Song Nam, said the film was tantamount to “an act of war” and threatened “a decisive and merciless countermeasure.”

At the time, Rogen, Goldberg, and Sony decided to start screening the movie more widely to play down any political messages. The studio is now pushing ahead with that plan.

Rogen is making the rounds on The Colbert Report, The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, Late Night With Seth Meyers, and Live With Kelly and Michael in the next two weeks. In company emails from June, a studio publicity executive suggested that filmmakers and talent play down any political angle in interviews.

If people are asked about whether or not they are “worried about repercussions on the world stage” as a result of the film, the executive advises them to brush off the question by saying, “You give us too much credit.” And if they’re asked if the film is racist? “No. We’re calling out the absurdity of jingoism.”

Whether all the controversy will help or hurt the movie at the box office remains to be seen. Early tracking for the film suggests a total box office of $25 million to $30 million for the four-day Christmas weekend, a decent but far from spectacular total.

But perhaps more central is the political fallout. On Friday, the U.S. special representative for North Korea policy urged Pyongyang to stop being preoccupied with the film and look at areas such as human rights and the economy. “I would encourage the North Korean leadership to focus on important aspects, rather than this movie,” new U.S. special representative for North Korea Sung Kim said in Beijing.

Federal prosecutors are also investigating whether the email hack, which has featured embarrassing exchanges from such figures as Sony Pictures Chief Amy Pascal and film and theater producer Scott Rudin, was, in fact, caused by North Korea.

Examination of the hacked emails suggest a company excited about the possibilities of a real-world villain but also concerned about the implications.

In an email exchange in mid-May, Dwight Caines, Sony’s president of theatrical marketing, responded to Rogen’s inquiry about the release plans by writing, “[T]hat Kim is a real guy is what makes this even more interesting and crazy. This is the other kind of positioning we need to embrace. The movie is doing something bold that I’m not sure any other movie has done before taking on as it’s [sic] subject matter a real persona of this notoriety.”

But second thoughts were also creeping up. On June 17 — three days before the first North Korea public comments — Sony’s Motion Picture Group President Doug Belgrad discussed executives’ concerns with Lynton.

“I understand this is a delicate issue and will do whatever I can to help address all of the issues and concerns,” Belgrad wrote to him in the email. He went on to say that he’s researching whether “there is precedent on depicting and/or killing a living leader on film” and was looking at various other examples, such as Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator and Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s Team America: World Police.

In a lengthy exchange, Pascal and Rogen discussed whether a gory scene featuring Kim Jong Un should be changed due to concerns about North Korea and how that will play in the media.

“This is now a story of Americans changing their movie to make North Koreans happy. That is a very damning story,” Rogen wrote. He asks Pascal to modify the required changes. In the end, the changes were relatively modest.

The question of Sony’s creative involvement in the North Korean aspects of the movie has been a key one. The narrative the studio and filmmakers has put forth is that Sony had contemplated a fictional villain but that Rogen and Goldberg were set on Kim Jung Un. But an internal email suggests that Sony specifically had North Korea added to the script.

As part of a set visit by journalists last year, a publicist wrote in a memo to top executives that screenwriter Dan Sterling had told the media that the “original script had a fake dictator. While on the set of Neighbors [the Rogen 2013 comedy], a Sony exec said they should make it Kim Jong Un so they did.”

The summary engendered a reply from Weaver, Sony’s governmental affairs executive.

“I think that’s problematic,” he wrote. “There was much discussion on this and a statement like this makes it sound very Sonycorp directed versus talent desire … Perhaps we [Sony] were insistent or perhaps it was a consensus, but I think it’s a challenge to put the company/our parent company out there this way.”

Julie Makinen contributed to this report from Beijing and Saba Hamedy contributed from Los Angeles.

Photo: Ed Araquel / Columbia Pictures