Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, March 27, 2017

Washington (AFP) — Secretary of State John Kerry will this week defend an emerging deal intended to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, urging skeptical U.S. lawmakers not to put up obstacles that could scupper the tough negotiations.

“I’ll lay out the facts,” Kerry told CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday when asked about a different narrative emerging from Iranian leaders about the outlines of a deal agreed in Lausanne, Switzerland earlier this month.

“Everything I have laid out is a fact. And I’ll stand by them.”

The Lausanne framework marked a major breakthrough in a 12-year standoff between Iran and the West, which disputes Tehran’s denial that it is seeking to acquire nuclear bomb.

Global powers must resolve a series of difficult technical issues by a June 30 deadline for a final deal, including the steps for lifting global sanctions imposed on Iran, and lingering questions over the possible military dimensions of its nuclear program.

“I think people need to hold their fire and let us negotiate without interference and be able to complete the job over the course of the two-and-a-half months,” Kerry said.

The State Department angered Iran when it released a fact sheet on April 2 about the Lausanne outlines, which appeared to differ from the Iranians’ understanding of what had been agreed.

Iran’s Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who will have the final say on any deal, plunged the accord into doubt last week suggesting that “nothing is binding” while President Hassan Rouhani demanded that sanctions be immediately lifted when any deal is signed.

Global powers — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — have said sanctions will only be gradually eased and want a mechanism to ensure they can be swiftly reimposed if Iran breaks its word.

“We had this same duelling narratives, discrepancies, spin, whatever you want to call it with respect to the interim agreement” reached in November 2013, Kerry said.

But he insisted that Iran had complied with the interim deal freezing parts of its nuclear program in exchange for limited sanctions relief.

Kerry, however, has come under fire from U.S. lawmakers, including his former Republican Senate friend and adversary John McCain who last week said America’s top diplomat was “delusional.”

“I think you’re going to find out that they never agreed to the things that John Kerry claimed they had,” McCain told a radio show on Thursday, adding that Kerry was now trying to “sell a bill of goods hoping that maybe the Iranians wouldn’t say much about it.”

Kerry refused to be drawn into a tit-for-tat argument with McCain.

“What we’re looking for is not to have Congress interfere with our ability, inappropriately, by stepping on the prerogatives of the executive department of the president, and putting in place conditions and terms that are going to get in the way of the limitation of a plan,” Kerry told NBC’s Meet the Press.

But President Barack Obama on Saturday leapt to Kerry’s defense.

Suggesting America’s top diplomat was “somehow less trustworthy in the interpretation of what’s in a political agreement than the supreme leader of Iran — that’s an indication of the degree to which partisanship has crossed all boundaries,” Obama told reporters in Panama.

Obama said he could understand that people might not trust Iran, which has not had diplomatic ties with the United States since the 1979 storming of the U.S. embassy in Tehran.

But “actively communicating that the United States government and our secretary of state is somehow spinning presentations in a negotiation with a foreign power, particularly one that you say is your enemy, that’s a problem. It needs to stop.”

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius meanwhile agreed Sunday that “there remains work to do” to reach a final deal after talks in Saudi Arabia.

Secretary of State John Kerry meets with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in Geneva on January 14 for a bilateral meeting to provide guidance to their negotiating teams before their next round of discussions, which begin on January 15.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 The National Memo

13 Responses to Don’t Interfere With Iran Talks, Kerry Urges Congress

  1. Those determined to perpetuate the climate of hostility and overt warfare that has been the norm in the Persian Gulf region during the last 40 years of so should offer an alternative to achieve peace, without compromising our security or interests in the region. Expressing concern over a deal, that is still being worked, without viable alternatives and suggestions limited to more sanctions (preserving the status quo) only benefit the arms industry, those who profit from warfare, Saudi Arabia, and Israel.

    • From what Obama said was in the agreement and what the Ayatollah has told his people are so far apart. Obama “unprecedented access” just doesn’t fit with the Ayatollah comment, no access to military facilities or to most facilities unannounced, all sanctions removed on signing. This agreement continues to unravel each day.
      Viable alternatives-real time access to all facilities. What you choose to ignore is that many final agreements there are sections that are unknown until months, years later.
      You are naive enough to believe Iran will abide by the rules. They haven’t in the past, so why should they now??

      • And both are different from what O’Reilly said was in the agreement. Why weigh in before the draft is complete?

        Oh yeah. We’re only spending $610B on the military this year, so another war is necessary to boost that up to $1T where the GOP likes it.

        • This is the agreement before the agreement is put into writing. Why this big announcement if this isn’t the precursor to a written agreement. This a agreement with many sticking points having opposite positions, but in Obama mind a really good agreement. Remember “unprecedented access”!!! What a laugh.

  2. The House and Senate are never worried about letting the White House drag us into constant wars without congressional approval, but let a President try to find peace or compromise with countries which don’t toe the American line, and the Congress has to foul up everything. Disgusting!

Leave a reply