Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, October 21, 2016

Washington (AFP) — Most Americans want the United States to do less overseas, with the question of the country’s global role divisive across the political spectrum, a survey said Thursday.

Six in ten said the United States should focus more on home and less overseas, according to a wide-ranging study of U.S. political views by the Pew Research Center.

That figure was the same as in the last survey in 2011 but was up from 49 percent in 2005, in the midst of the Afghan and Iraq wars.

The survey, which included interviews with 10,013 adults, found that U.S. attitudes did not fall neatly into left/right categories.

Some 71 percent of Americans classified by the survey as “steadfast conservatives,” who tend to be religious and traditional, said that the United States should focus less abroad.

But 67 percent of more business-minded conservatives, who also lean toward the Republican Party, said the United States should pursue an active global role — stronger support than from any other group.

Most liberals also supported an active U.S. role overseas, but the strongest opposition came from Americans identified as “hard-pressed skeptics,” who lean toward President Barack Obama’s Democratic Party but are generally low-income and distrustful of government. An overwhelming 87 percent in the group said the United States should focus less overseas.

The survey comes as the United States prepares for a 2016 election that could scramble traditional divides on foreign policy.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who is considered a potential 2016 candidate, is deeply skeptical of foreign intervention, while potential Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton sometimes took positions more hawkish than Obama while she was secretary of state.

The Pew survey also showed differences across the spectrum on immigration. Both liberals and business conservatives overwhelmingly embraced immigrants, while wide majorities of steadfast conservatives and hard-pressed skeptics were critical.

Overall, 59 percent of Americans said immigrants strengthened the country, while 35 percent said that a growing number of immigrants posed a threat to “traditional American customs/values.”

AFP Photo / Daniel Shirey

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 The National Memo
  • Dominick Vila

    Considering our dependence on global trade, the vast economic interests we have worldwide, and potential threats against our national security, we simply cannot abandon our global interests and geo-political goals. That, however, does not mean we should interfere in the internal affairs of other nations, or take actions that compromise the security of the world, including ours.
    There is a difference between protecting and advancing our interests and getting involved in countries such as Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq. We have to go no further than Iraq to understand that there are long term consequences to “solutions” designed to help a few in their pursuit of personal goals. What is happening in Iraq is a clear example of obtuse foreign policy. When we removed Saddam Hussein from power, and the Sunnis from government positions, and replaced them with Shiites aligned spiritually to Iran, we changed the balance of power in the region, and we energized those whose livelihood and lives were threatened. Today, we are harvesting the fruits of the seeds we planted. Let the Iraqis, Afghans, and everyone else solve their internal problems, and let’s limit our role in the world to effective actions, that ought to start by showing the world the benefits of being a civilized nation with values we are determined to protect.