Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Sunday, October 23, 2016

The Senate’s immigration reform efforts took a major step forward Monday, when a bipartisan coalition of 67 senators voted to advance the “border surge” amendment in a vote that was widely seen as a test run for the full “Gang of Eight” reform bill.

The border surge, which was introduced by senators Bob Corker (R-TN) and John Hoeven (R-ND) on Thursday, would set up a number of border security provisions — such as nearly doubling the size of the U.S. border patrol to 40,000, building 700 miles of new fencing on the U.S.-Mexican border, and implementing e-verify systems to crack down on undocumented employment — that must be met before any undocumented immigrants could begin receiving green cards. With its roughly $30 billion in border security spending, the amendment provides political cover to Republican senators who need to show their constituents that they are dedicated to “securing the border” before offering immigrants a path to citizenship.

Monday’s vote for cloture on the amdenment will likely serve as a preview of the vote on the full “Gang of Eight” bill. Fifteen Republican senators — John Hoeven (ND), Bob Corker (TN), Lindsey Graham (SC), John McCain (AZ), Jeff Chiesa (NJ), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Roger Wicker (MS), Mark Kirk (IL), Marco Rubio (FL), Orrin Hatch (UT), Susan Collins (ME), Jeff Flake (AZ), Lisa Murkowski (AK), and Lamar Alexander (TN) — voted to advance the amendment; all but Wicker are expected to support the final bill. No Democrats voted against the border surge, although several senators from both parties missed the vote due to travel delays. With Corker and Hoeven’s amendment included, the “Gang of Eight” bill is expected to pass the Senate comfortably, as early as this week. The bill will then proceed to the Republican-dominated House of Represenatives.

“This bill will pass with votes from both Democrats and Republicans, and, when it does, the Speaker should bring it up for a vote in the House of Representatives as well,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday, in remarks directed at House Speaker John Boehner. “Rather than twisting the arms of Tea Party extremists, just work with moderates from both parties to pass bipartisan legislation.”

Boehner is unlikely to follow Reid’s advice, however. The Speaker has referred to the Senate bill as “weak,” and “laughable,” and insisted, “I don’t see any way of bringing an immigration bill to the floor that doesn’t have a majority support of Republicans.” If Boehner does indeed follow the “Hastert Rule,” and refuses to bring the immigration bill to the floor without majority support from his caucus, then it would effectively kill hopes for reform.

Even if Boehner does bring the bill to the floor, there’s no guarantee that it would pass through the House. As Boehner’s embarrassing failure to pass a farm bill last week proved, right now the Speaker has very little tangible control over how the Republican caucus votes.

AP Photo/Molly Riley, File

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • Independent1

    Unfortunately many of our Senators are removed from reality – building fences will not stop immigrants who really want to get into the U.S. from coming here – the notion that fences will stop people is delusional. But worse than that, the existing fencing is already causing great damage to the environment, wildlife and even people’s lives. It’s truly sad that some senators are so clueless as to believe that voting for the “Border Surge” amendment is a good thing. The existing fence has already separated some poor people from their sources of food and water resulting in some folks dying; and it’s blocking the migration and feeding patterns of many wildlife, interrupting their breeding patterns and creating a reduction in some speciies – some of them already endangered. And the fencing already built has created flooding and other environmental damage – including creating bad feelings between Mexican and American governments because of the similar damage it has created on the Mexican side of the border.

    So this nonsense Border Surge is going to do nothing but make an already bad situation worse – and do very little to improve the supposed security of our country’s southern border which has already seen border crossings reduced to the lowest levels in 40 years. In addition, adding a large number of additional border guards, many of them untrained – will surely result in even more unfortunate deaths as has been the case already when trigger happy guards jump to conclusions and end up killing innocent people, both Mexican and American; who are doing nothing but enjoying a day near the border, some as young as 8 years old.

    • FredAppell

      I may be wrong but I think it’s possibly more about the message that the surge is intended to send than it is about a real and honest solution. As you so correctly

      pointed out, nothing is going to stop people who desperately want to get here. So far nothing has worked including everything short of a full scale military operation, mark my words, that’s probably being considered especially when the right-wing throws around terms like invasion from illegals. I refer to them more as refugees considering they are actually fleeing from something as opposed to

      invading us. I’ll probably catch a lot of heat for that but I really don’t care. Some of what they are fleeing from is of our own making and now we need to deal with it.

  • docb

    Fiscally irresponsible, overkill, and penury punishment for the immigrant from the repub baggers. … And foolish dems went along with this piece of claptrap!

  • silence dogood

    Border Surge = BS