Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016

GENEVA (AFP) – President Bashar al-Assad confirmed for the first time Thursday that Syria plans to give up its chemical weapons and demanded that the U.S. drop threats of military action against his regime in return.

“When we see that the United States truly desires stability in our region and stops threatening and seeking to invade, as well as stops arms supplies to terrorists then we can believe that we can follow through with the necessary processes,” Assad said in an interview on Russian television.

Washington should dispense with the “politics of threats,” he warned.

Assad also signalled that he was ready to start the disarmament process by filing documents to the United Nations as the first step towards joining an international convention outlawing the possession and use of chemical weapons.

“Syria will be sending an appeal to the U.N. and the Organisation for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in a few days, which will have technical documents necessary to sign the agreement,” he said.

Despite Assad’s demand, U.S. President Barack Obama said he was hopeful U.S.-Russia talks due to start in Geneva could produce a workable weapons transfer plan that will avert the need for military action.

Assad had earlier rejected suggestions the threat of airstrikes had forced his hand.

“Syria is handing over chemical weapons under international control because of Russia,” he said. “U.S. threats have not affected the decision.”

Backed by a large team of experts, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva.

“I am hopeful that the discussions that Secretary Kerry has with Foreign Minister Lavrov as well as some of the other players in this can yield a concrete result and I know that he is going to be working very hard over the next several days over the possibilities there,” Obama said.

Washington wants to see if Assad is serious about putting his chemical weapons stockpile under international control, amid allegations the regime used sarin gas in an attack near Damascus last month.

Ahead of the talks, a senior U.S. official saidWashington was urging Syria to “declare all of their stockpile quickly.”

The official said Washington would be asking for specific action from Damascus to test the regime’s sincerity and discussing the “different modalities” of destroying Assad’s chemical weapons and production facilities.

“It’s doable, but difficult,” the official said.

Lavrov voiced optimism ahead of the talks, saying during a visit to Kazakhstan: “I am sure that there is a chance for peace in Syria… We cannot let it slip away.”

The United States and its main backer of military strikes on Syria — France — have warned they will not allow the chemical weapons plan to become a delaying tactic in Syria’s brutal war, saying the threat of military force remains on the table.

“All of this should, if everyone is aware of their responsibilities, allow for the end of chemical weapons in Syria and for us to find a political solution, but France is keeping up pressure,” President Francois Hollande told journalists.

Revealing details of the Russian proposal for the first time Thursday, daily Kommersant said Moscow had given Washington a four-step plan for the weapons handover.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • montanabill

    Does anyone really believe that this whole charade isn’t simply a way to look diplomatic by everyone? There will be endless negotiations, Assad will continue killing, and, in the end, he will still have chemical weapons. If he is successful at defeating the rebels, no one will ever get permission to search for them. Given that the President put the U.S. in a no-win situation, this is probably the best out. Though not so good for the peoples of the middle east.

    • Sand_Cat

      Kinda like his predecessor put us in a no-win situation, right? Only that time, lots and lots of perople died that wouldn’t have, otherwise.
      Was there anything the president could have done that would have been good for the peoples of the middle east? If so, why didn’t you suggest it?

      • montanabill

        Actually, you are still perverting history. But what the heck, keep playing the ‘Bush’ card. Three years from now, Hillary will have forgotten her role and be playing it too. Sorry, I don’t have a quick answer to the middle east, but I do know when to listen instead of whipping out a teleprompter.

      • silence dogood

        Vlad is doing donuts on Obama,s front lawn. Cold beats cool. Gee…..the audacity of Vlad.