Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, March 22, 2019

Here comes a great courtroom drama, pitting the president against the Senate, which will act as judge and jury. The stakes are supremely high, even higher than the presidential race. Filling the empty seat on the Supreme Court amounts to changing the balance of power on the aggressively conservative Court.

It began in the White House Rose Garden, where President Obama presented his pick, Judge Merrick Garland. But the Senate has to “advise and consent” on Supreme Court Justices. The House has no place in the drama, unfolding as a major heartburner. Senate Republicans have defiantly declared they will not hold hearings on any Obama Court nominee, period, and they control the ball.

Doing his part for harmony in this rare tangle of the three branches of government, Obama went out of his way to name the most reasoned man in the land: Merrick Garland. The middle of the road is named after him. How nice to nominate a moderate Midwestern Jew who has earned plaudits from both sides of the political spectrum. True to form, Obama named someone who went to Harvard and Harvard Law School; he’s a Harvard snob.

The chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit was greeted as a smart choice. Everybody has a good word to say. You can hear the chorus: “Great guy, brings a lot to the table.” Garland served with Chief Justice John Roberts. He flew to Oklahoma City to investigate the 1995 bombing tragedy that shook the federal building. He prosecuted one doer, Timothy McVeigh.

In these trying times, Garland’s style is known as evenhanded, in contrast to the late Antonin Scalia, the Court’s most outspoken conservative for 30 years.

But the Senate’s a slow, languorous animal with a stubborn streak. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is Obama’s antagonist. From the day Obama became president, McConnell has tried to make him fail. During a fleeting Senate career, Obama never got close to the elders in the opposite party. He never cared how conflicts and deals got worked out. He was running for president.

As president, Obama never commanded the respect of Republican leaders. He has yet to win a clash of serious Shakespearean proportions in seven years in office — setting aside the Obamacare victory six springs ago in a Democratic Congress.

The Court pick is his last chance for a clear victory in a Republican Congress. And he comes at it straight, inviting senators to do the same, even as the daggers in men’s eyes stare back at him.

A fair hearing is all Obama asks in the Rose Garden, he says; he never promises a rose garden. The Democratic strategy is fixed on pressuring Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the Judiciary Committee chairman with the power to hold a confirmation hearing. He’s a twangy 82, running for re-election in the state that gave Obama his political engine that could.

Some say Senate Republicans are rude to Obama because they’re racist. But many are rude because it’s the way of their world. Gone is the genteel, sedate Senate. A handful will meet with Garland as a courtesy, as the outstanding judge walks the halls. That’s all.

Let me ‘fess up: I wished for a pocket recess appointment. Obama could put someone in place for a year or so, not subject to Senate confirmation. This short-term action would buttress the nation’s front on reproductive rights, under siege. But Obama chose the harder path to leave his writing on the wall.

McConnell, a crafty strategist, has sounded a note of jester’s irony, citing a so-called “Biden rule” with a straight face on the floor. “The people should have a say in the Court’s direction,” McConnell said. The vice president must be crimson at words he spoke in 1992, as Senate Judiciary Chairman, suggesting Court appointments in a presidential election year become too political.

Biden never addresses the painful memory of Clarence Thomas’s confirmation to the Court. He gave Thomas a pass to a vote only one year — 12 months — before President George H.W. Bush ran for re-election.

If they had voted on arch-conservative Thomas (52-48) late in a president’s term, then we have to have Garland. Call it justice delayed.

To find out more about Jamie Stiehm and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit

Photo: President Barack Obama (L) arrives with Judge Merrick Garland (R) and Vice President Joe Biden prior to announcing Garland as his nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, at the White House in Washington, March 16, 2016.   REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 73

7 responses to “Obama Keeps Rosy Eye On History With Thorny Garland Nomination”

  1. Howard Covitz says:

    So, lemme get this straight. The Republican Senate could not only refuse to vote on Garland, this year, but could if Clinton or Sanders wins, refuse to vote on any appointee even if 2 or 3 or more Supremes kick off and thereby allow SCOTUS to drop to 5 or even 0 Sitting Justices. Can that be? … whoa …

    • Brenda Linder says:

      “my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….

      two days ago new Mc.Laren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Hereo!634➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsJobs/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:::::o!634…….

    • itsfun says:

      Yep, the Congress can change the number of judges on the Supreme court if they choose. There is not set number of judges by the Constitution. The Congress has the power to make rules for the Supreme Court and decide how many judges they want on it. Currently the number of Justices is set at 8, not including the Chief Justice.

  2. yabbed says:

    Republicans are so busy celebrating their devotion to the racism that has accompanied the administration of President Obama that they don’t notice the strategy to regain the Senate for the Democrats. The vast majority of Americans disapprove of Congress and the majority of Americans want to see the Senate hold fair hearings and a vote on Justice Garland. Smart is not a characteristic of the right wing freaks, is it? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.