Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Any high-profile person starting a Twitter account is news.

But when the president does it? Well, that’s something else entirely.

Who does he follow? Who is he talking to? Who’s tweeting at him? And how many of those tweets consist of threats and hate speech? (Unfortunately, a lot.)

@POTUS — not to be confused with @BarackObama, which is controlled by the group Organizing for Action — is the actual Twitter handle of the president.

So who is @POTUS following? Most of the 65 accounts he follows are government entities — the Treasury Department, Energy Department, Department of Veterans Affairs — and high-level administration officials, like Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewel, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker.

But he also follows his alma maters, Occidental College (1979-1981), Columbia University (1981-1983), and Harvard University (1988-1991); Chicago sports teams (Blackhawks, White Sox, Bears, and Bulls); and of course, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, and the White House.

Notably lacking? The Chicago Tribune pointed out that @POTUS was not following the Chicago Cubs.

Former advisor David Axelrod told the Tribune that the president has pledged his allegiance to the White Sox many times.

“Hey, say what you will, he’s consistent,” Axelrod said. “Once a Sox man, always a Sox man.”

The Sox’s senior coordinator of social media, Colleen Maxwell, told the Tribune that “it’s standard procedure” not to follow a rival when you’re a big fan of a particular team. “But if it was him [clicking to follow], it shows he knows the audience. He knows what he’s doing.”

@POTUS, which launched earlier this week, will have tweets coming exclusively from the president, the White House announced, as part of his ongoing effort to be transparent to the American public. The president immediately charmed with an exchange with former President Bill Clinton (whom he follows, along with the first President Bush):

Along with @FLOTUS and @VP, the @POTUS account will have new owners, presumably after the presidential inauguration in 2017.

However, in the five days since the account launched, @POTUS has been the recipient of racial slurs and hate speech. Since @POTUS’s bio says that tweets directed at the account can be archived — as is true of anyone whose tweets are part of official government business — it may not be advisable to tweet the president directly. The Secret Service monitors Twitter for threats, and they will go after someone they deem a credible threat.

Case in point: Jeff Gullickson of Minneapolis tweeted a doctored picture of the president with a noose around his neck, calling for his arrest. The Secret Service landed on his doorstep shortly after, The New York Times reported.

Don’t presume that you can just use Americans’s favorite justification for everything, the First Amendment, as an excuse to make violent tweets against the president. As Hanni Fakhoury, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told The Daily Dot, “the First Amendment does not protect true threats: any statement that conveys an intent to do harm or physical injury.” Tweeting threats to the president can land you in jail.

The BBC on Wednesday published its own comparison of world leaders’ Twitter accounts.

@BarackObama leads with more than 59 million followers, with the Pope in second place — although he has nine (!) different accounts, each in a different language, so that designation really needs an asterisk.

India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, is number three and Turkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is fourth. India’s huge population and Twitter’s popularity in Turkey accounts for their high standings.

@POTUS, as of this writing, has 2.33 million followers, although that number is sure to grow. Sysomos, a social media monitoring firm, published a blog post Wednesday analyzing the spread of @POTUS’s tweets and his audience. Only 38 percent of his followers identify themselves as coming from the U.S., with the U.K. making up 6.6 percent. (Over 27 percent is unidentified.) Sixty-five percent of his followers are male, with 35 percent female.

Photo: For some reason, it took six years for Barack Obama to do this. Image: @POTUS/Twitter

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 The National Memo
  • Daniel Jones

    On quite a few occasions, political foes of Barack Obama have said he should suffer, well, a wide variety of doom.

    Please arrest them as well.

    • ringostarr1

      Oh, we have another little Herman Goering and Heinrich Himmler want-to-be among us. What Mr. Jones advocates is exactly how Herman Goering started out with the SS & Gestapo and how Heinrich Himmler carried the SS & the Gestapo through to the final solution.
      Don’t try to tell me that Conservatives are Fascists! The only true Fascists in North America is the Democrat Party and their supporters.

      • ralphkr

        So, ringostarr1, in your world the Democrats are true Fascists. I deduce from your above statement that in your world the sun rises out of the Pacific Ocean off the coast of California and sets in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South Carolina. I bet in your universe the sun and the rest of your universe rotates around your Earth.

        • ringostarr1

          And in your world if the Democrat Party tells you that chit tastes just like German chocolate cake, you write your Senator for a second serving.
          Oh, btw you never answered my question about how much
          Hillary is paying you to grid lock the digital super highway with your meaningless observations.

          • JPHALL

            You are really so, so sad! Medical help us available even without Obamacare in many states. Please get the help you obviously need.

          • ralphkr

            Hey, JPHALL, I fear that there is no help, medical or otherwise, for fools such as ringostarr1, mike, and their misguided ilk. I must admit that the Republicans were able to change my mind about President Clinton in the 1990s and they are well on the way to doing the same. In 1993 I considered B. Clinton just another cheap politician from a third rate southern state and certainly not worthy of my vote but the Republican party with all their sublimely stupid shenanigans and asinine theories soon convinced me that Clinton was actually a pretty great guy and deserved a second & even a third term (if only that had been possible). Now the Republican shills with all their meaningless blather about nonexistent scandals are starting to raise H. Clinton up to the level of someone for whom I should vote. I feel that anyone who instills such fear in the American Fascist Party, i.e., Republicans certainly deserves the support of all of us patriotic American citizens who support the US Constitution.

          • Duke

            Very well said !

          • JPHALL

            You are so right. Talking to them is like talking to a wall. They are like acolytes merely repeating what they were told. They obsess and cannot move on. Subject: Re: Comment on @POTUS: Another Way To Attack The President

  • ringostarr1

    Well now we see what America’s Liberals have in store for those of us who disagree with them. It’s too bad that Siberia is in the former Soviet Union because the liberals will have to content themselves with sending all of us sane Americans to the fridge tundra of unspoiled Alaska.

    • Duke

      No — all of you ” sane Americans ” can just go to Texas— Please ?

      • ringostarr1

        From the number of seats that Texas has gained in the House after the last few censuses, it looks like the smart money is already betting on Texas.

  • JohnR

    Articles like this are troll magnets.