He means scarring, of course, Scarring For Texas Women.

Rick hates women.

He hates you, too, because you’re not Rick Perry.

You Have Been warned.
Have a nice day.

Somehow we have got to take advantage of these idiot politicians in Texas and hold them up as an example of what can happen if this extreme ideology takes hold of this country.

Doesn’t Planned Parenthood offer vasectomies? It should, and for free too.

What else could we expect from a state like Texas? Their record of bad treatment of women is abysmal !!! And Rick Perry, clearly a mental midget, is only going to take the state backward.

DISTRACTIONS………. DISTRACTIONS………………… DISTRACTIONS……………….

This whole “war on women” crap is nothing more than a manufactured crisis invented by the Obozo propagandists to split and divide Americans pitting one group against another for Obozo’s reelction campaign. Only the dumbest of the dumb out of you useful idiots actually believe such nonsense.

Instead, we should be focusing on what is actually important. Things like our declining economy and our out of control national debt. Witness last week’s announcement that the economy shrank in Q4 2012. All of the leftist freaks and useful idiots at The Memo and in the media chose to blame the decline on a decline in government spending. Well, well, well. SURPRISE! That too is a lie coming from Obozo and his very own Pravda. Here are the facts. Hat tip, James Agresti, at Just Facts(dot)com.
——————————————————
original link with hyperlinked footnotes at: justfactsdaily(dot)com/economy-declined-as-government-spending-rose

Economy declined as government spending rose
By James D. Agresti

February 4, 2013

In the wake of stunning news that the U.S. economy shrunk by 0.1% in the last quarter of 2012, prominent media outlets and commentators are reporting that lower government spending is the cause of the economic decline. In reality, however, government spending rose by 0.8%, and the claim that it fell stems from a federal report that defines “government spending” so narrowly that it excludes 47% of all government spending.

On January 30th, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) issued a preliminary report stating that gross domestic product (GDP) decreased by 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2012. The report emphasized that this is an “advance estimate … based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision….” The report also stated that the decrease in GDP “reflected negative contributions from private inventory investment, federal government spending, and exports….”

Seizing upon the “federal government spending” aspect of this report, some journalists, commentators and organizations have claimed that reduced government spending is dragging down the economy. This was the focal point of a combative exchange on CNBC between on-air editor Rick Santelli and senior economics reporter Steve Liesman. Attributing the decline in GDP to left-leaning government policies, Santelli stated, “When you act like Europe, you get growth rates like Europe, and our discussions with economists sounds like we’re in Europe!” To which Liesman shot back, “We reduced government spending by 15 percent! That’s not Europe!”

In fact, government spending rose by 0.8%, and the decline that Liesman and others are citing only applies to a narrow segment of spending that excludes most social program benefits. This is shown in BEA’s report on GDP, which reveals that the “government spending” in this report consists of “government consumption expenditures and gross investment.” This is merely a subset of government spending that excludes 69% of all federal spending and 20% of all state and local spending. As BEA explains in its “Primer on Government Accounts” and its webpage on measures of government spending“:

• “Consumption expenditures include what government spends on its work force and for goods and services, such as fuel for military jets and rent for government buildings and other structures.”
• “Gross investment includes what government spends on structures, equipment, and software, such as new highways, schools, and computers.”
• “Government consumption expenditures and gross investment … is a measure of government spending on goods and services that are included in GDP.”
• “Total spending by government is much larger than the spending included in GDP.”

In sum, what BEA categorizes as “government spending” in its GDP reports doesn’t include items such as unemployment benefits, food stamps, welfare payments, subsidized housing, Medicaid benefits, Social Security benefits, Medicare benefits, foreign aid, and interest on the national debt. This amounts to 47% of all federal, state and local government spending, largely consisting of social programs that advocates for more government spending say will spur economic growth.

The BEA report in question estimates that “government spending” declined by 15% in the fourth quarter of 2012, consisting of a 22% decline in national defense, a 1% increase in other federal spending, and 1% decrease in state and local spending. Again, these figures are preliminary, they only apply to selected categories of government spending, and real total government expenditures actually increased by 1%.

Hence, if one were to draw a simplistic conclusion from this data (as reporters and analysts have done), an accurate assessment would be that increased overall government spending—with more spending on social programs and less on national defense—accompanied the decline in GDP.

It is important to note that the above-cited figures are comparisons between the third and fourth quarters of 2012, and quarterly figures on government spending tend to fluctuate. Thus, when journalists and commentators focus on short-term data as they have done in this case, they obscure the larger picture of what has taken place in the past several years and over the longer term. Consider the following.

As shown in the graph below, total government spending rose dramatically in 2008 and 2009 and has since consumed more of the nation’s economy than at any time since 1960, which is as far back as this BEA data goes. BEA also tracks a slightly less inclusive measure of government spending (called current expenditures) that dates back to 1929. By this measure, government spending consumed more of the nation’s economy during 2009-2011 than ever recorded in the history of the nation, including the peak of World War II. And in 2012, current spending was just a hair below the peak of World War II.

——————————————————-

There’s a chart there as well and the article is cross linked with it’s sources. I encourage you all to go there and learn. Don’t get caught up in these stupid and moronic issues like “so-and-so’s war on women” that could not be more of a waste of time, except for the supreme idiots.

Have a nice day!

“Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods.” – H.L. Mencken

Right next door to Rick Perry is Booby Jindal, Republican governor of Louisiana, who is cutting and slashing like Edward Scissorhands! It seemes to be a scourched earth policy of every Republican/Tea Bag governor and legislator across America. They know that 2014 is nearing and many of them will be fired by the disgusted people of their states, or they are on their way out by term-limits, so “Oh well!, let’s give ‘em hell!” They are redistributing the money from their cuts and slashings to Republican/Tea Bag contractors, corporations, and industries, so they are not very concerned about crash-burning their careers. They will simply call in their IOU’s and become lobbyists, CEO’s, or spokesmen for these republican/Tea Bag contractors, corporations, and industries at lucrative salaries, essentially getting kick-backs from their support while in office. Man, nothing smells like the truth. I pray that Americans are learning from this. They have been doing this to us for a long time. It has to end.

Ah another example of STUPID greedy repukes and DIRTY judges who need to go we hope that when 2014 rolls around there will be a bunch of repukes heads on the CHOPPING BLOCK.

Gee, and this guy could have been president.

Will Rogers agreed and stated ….” Do not vote for these bastards ( Politicians), It will only encourage them.” It is a time for the common to rise and kick them all out. They should be only given Poverty level wages…..after working…. and let them see how it i s to make it…..

There is an important fact that Republicans and others who act like Perry, they wouldn’t be on this earth to carry out their war on women if it had not been for a woman. Is Perry married, does he have a mother or any sisters? Perry and others like him want to have so many people born in this overcrowded world to make things worse not better that they will do everything they can do to force women to carry unplanned, unwanted, and rape and incest biogoical material until it becomes a baby then walk away for that baby to starve to death, to be nelegected, abused or killed, all they want is for a baby to be born they could care less if the baby makes to adulthood they just want that biogoical matter born.

I wish my family (aunt & cousins) would leave that state. There is nothing good for them there. No health care for the women. No education for the children.

Now Rick Perry is trying to get people from California to move to Texas. Who in there right mind would do that?

Perry is a class A a$$hole.

Hey Perry, you better start looking over your shoulder. Women will not take this crap from you for long and there are alot more of us than men. Does your wife brow beat you and make you feel like the worm you are? That must be the reason you can’t stand women

I have me stupid opinionated people before but never so many in one place. The Republican Party as it was known, is totaly against the people of the United States. Everyone who works for a living should vote against the Republican party. I am against abortion,however I do not have the right to tell a victim of rape or incest they must go through the hell of bearing that mans child. I also believe every working person should have the right to strike for a living wage and not work in the conditions that brought the depresion

And Texan’s SAT scores already rank 46th in the nation and they lead the nation in high school drop out rates.

And Texan’s SAT scores rank 46th in the nation and they they lead the nation in High School drop out rates. Can’t get much worse than that I guess!!

Happy for TEXAS….Until we figure out who is really POOR or just plain lazy I am happy with this decision. We are sick and tired of women have child after child for us the working class to pay for. Time to cut them off unless they can prove they are disabled or are working and need additional assistance period! Hurrah for the state of TEXAS!

And my question still continues to be, where will all these men lawmakers be when all these babies are being born and need to be on welfare and food stamps? Then they will be “takers” and be part of the 47%! It’s ridiculous! They can’t see past their noses!

The dumb A$$e$ in texass voted for this dumba$$ let them live with it.

I’m happy about this…I praise Perry for standing up for Texas. If you don’t like it move.

lets us put democrats in the house. we don’t need another bush or chaney. look at a mess they left the country in obama spent his first 4 years trying to correct it and occonnell definately needs to go.

>> PARKLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL…..UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!
>> And this is just ONE hospital !!!!
>>
>>
>> Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, Texas is a fairly famous
>> institution
>> and for a variety of reasons:
>>
>> 1. John F. Kennedy died there in 1963.
>> 2. Lee Harvey Oswald died there shortly after.
>> 3. Jack Ruby, who killed Lee Harvey Oswald, died there a few years
>> later
>> by coincidence On the flip side, Parkland is also home to the second
>> busiest maternity ward in the country with almost 16,000 new babies
>> arriving each year. (That’s almost 44 per day—every day.)
>>
>> A recent patient survey indicated that 70 percent of the women who
>> gave
>> birth at Parkland in the first three months of 2006 were illegal
>> immigrants.’ Crikey, that’s 11,200 “anchor babies” born every year
>> just in
>> Dallas. According to the article, the hospital spent $70.7 million
>> delivering 15,938 babies in 2004 but managed to end up with almost $8
>> million dollars in surplus funding. Medicaid kicked in $34.5 million,
>> Dallas County taxpayers kicked in $31.3 million and the feds tossed in
>> another $9.5 million.
>>
>> The average patient in Parkland’s maternity wards is 25 years old,
>> married
>> and giving birth to her second child. She is also an illegal
>> immigrant.
>> By law, pregnant women cannot be denied medical care based on their
>> immigration status or ability to pay. OK, fine. That doesn’t mean
>> they
>> should receive better care than everyday, middle-class American
>> citizens.
>> But at Parkland Hospital, they do.
>>
>> Parkland Memorial Hospital has nine prenatal clinics. NINE.
>> The Dallas Morning News article followed a Hispanic woman who was a
>> patient
>> at one of the clinics and pregnant with her third child—her
>> previous two
>> were also born at Parkland. Her first two deliveries were free and
>> the
>> Mexican native was grateful because it would have cost $200 to have
>> them in
>> Mexico. This time, the hospital wants her to pay $10 per visit and
>> $100
>> for the delivery but sh

And Perry calls himself prolife??? His policies are going to backfire in about 5 years when the kids who survive their mothers being denied prenatal care show up in kindergarten with physical, mental, and learning disabilities that were preventable with things like prenatal vitamins, blood pressure medication, and control for gestational diabetes. The kids will go into special education and get an SSI check instead of regular education, college a good job and life as a taxpayer. Oh, but Perry is so prolife!