Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Sunday, October 23, 2016

Nearly 60 years after the first solar cell was invented, the White House residence will finally get some of its power from the sun.

When President Jimmy Carter had 32 solar panels placed on the roof of the White House in 1979, he predicted that by the year 2000 they would “either be a curiosity, a museum piece, an example of a road not taken, or it can be just a small part of one of the greatest and most exciting adventures ever undertaken by the American people.”

Though Carter’s panels did little more than make a statement and heat water, President Ronald Reagan had them removed less than two years later and the first foray into using renewable energy to power the White House ended. Over the next few decades, some of the panels ended up heating a college cafeteria in Maine, and a few became museum pieces, proving Carter’s worst fears true.

In 2002, George W. Bush’s administration quietly installed a grid of 167 solar panels that became the first to power actual operations on the White House grounds, including a maintenance building and the swimming pool.

This week, the Obama administration will add 20-50 panels to power the White House residence for the first time ever as “a part of an energy retrofit that will improve the overall energy efficiency of the building.”

Energy Secretary Steven Chu and White House Council on Environmental Quality chair Nancy Sutley had announced in 2010 that the White House would go solar. But that promise took more than three years to fulfill. Why?

Perhaps it takes that long to get construction on the White House approved. Maybe the White House was desperate to avoid any connections to Solyndra, the failed solar company that the GOP tried to make the face of the stimulus to distract from the fact that the clean energy investments in the law were actually wildly successful.

Or maybe, at the same time Mitt Romney was trying to convince the world that he was the next Ronald Reagan, the president didn’t want to associate himself with Jimmy Carter (or George W. Bush).

“Better late than never — in truth, no one should ever have taken down the panels Jimmy Carter put on the roof way back in 1979,” said Bill McKibben, head of, one of the groups that pressed the administration to go solar. “But it’s very good to know that once again the country’s most powerful address will be drawing some of that power from the sun.”

Activists are hoping that this is another sign that the president may be on his way to rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline.

Photo: Tom Lohdan via


Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • Allan Richardson

    I did not know that President George W. Bush had installed solar panels, but I am not surprised that he did it “quietly” rather than draw attention to it. Ronald Reagan’s dismantling of Carter’s solar panels, obviously meant to make a statement (“we don’t need no stinkin’ sunshine!”), actually COST the taxpayers money!

    I understand the concern of ManesandTails, but given the political reality, the President has to pick his fights. If he drew attention to the wild horses, for example, the GOP House, just to spite him, would pass a repeal of that 1971 law. And they might be able to get enough Democrats in the Senate to pass it, and possibly override his veto. Then the next President would have to get the horse slaughter ban passed all over again. Fortunately, wild horses are not a “species” native to America (they were introduced by the Spanish), and domesticated horses would replenish their gene pool by escaping or being donated.

    The challenge right now is to get at the ROOT of the anti-environmental actions of government, namely the GOP extreme base. The President knows that, by trying to stop ALL economic development that might endanger more species, he would be giving them more ammunition to attract low information voters (see, he values some snail more than American jobs!) and distract them from the true cause of their lack of economic progress: LOW WAGES and benefits and low-security jobs, caused by the 1 percent’s private policies, enabled by conservative lawmakers.