Tag: children
With New Vaccine 'Guidelines,' Kennedy Makes America Sick Again

With New Vaccine 'Guidelines,' Kennedy Makes America Sick Again

Pregnant women and children may be losing access to more vaccines, in addition to COVID-19, due to new recommendations. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s newly beefed-up Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices met Thursday to discuss whether or not they will continue to recommend vaccinations in young children for hepatitis B as well as the measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella, known as the MMRV vaccine.

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention veteran Dr. Fiona Havers, who resigned in response to Kennedy’s dismantling of the CDC, saw the meeting as another anti-vaccine spectacle.

“This meeting, with a committee that is stacked with RFK Jr.'s handpicked appointees, many with a well-documented history of anti-vaccine views, was another opportunity for the HHS secretary to falsely stoke fears about vaccine safety,” Havers told Daily Kos.

Havers oversaw critical data-gathering on hospitalizations related to COVID-19 and crafted guidance on handling the Zika virus and other outbreaks during her time at the CDC. But now, she told Daily Kos as she watched the hearing, votes like this are just putting more people at risk.

“Anything that decreases vaccine confidence or access to vaccines will lead to unnecessary infections, more hospitalizations, and more preventable deaths,” she said.

When discussions kicked off Thursday afternoon, it didn’t take long for some to point out the pitfalls of removing or tampering with current vaccine guidelines.

At one point, ACIP member Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, pointed out that the proposed changes to the MMRV vaccine would put families at risk of not being able to afford immunizations for their children even if they did, in fact, want it. Under the proposed changes, the vaccine wouldn’t be covered by the financial assistance program Vaccines for Children. Additionally, insurance companies may drop coverage of the shot as well.

"So that implies that the parents' choice, unless they want to pay for it themselves, the parents' choice is taken away," Hibbeln said, adding that the option would be "basically taken away from them.”

While one ACIP member made a case against altering the MMRV vaccine recommendation, Kennedy made sure to fill the council with people who shared his ideology.

The HHS secretary sacked 17 members of the ACIP in June, and replaced them with his handpicked staff. Many of the people Kennedy selected have already been linked to anti-vaccine rhetoric.

And given the disastrous spread of measles across Texas earlier this year, vaccine availability may be a high concern for some.

However, it wasn’t just the MMRV on the table. The ACIP members also were voting on removing recommendations for hepatitis B immunizations in newborns. Typically, this shot has been administered to children soon after birth to protect them from contracting the virus in case their mother is a carrier.

Kennedy’s team of vaccine skeptics pushed the idea of waiting one to four months before giving the child the shot, should the mother test negative for hepatitis B.

“If there is some benefit or removal of harm from waiting a month, I haven’t seen any data,” one member of the panel shot back said. “But there are a number of potential harms.”

Havers also pointed out the dangers of delaying the shot.

“If the recommendation for a universal hepatitis B birth dose is changed, more infants will be infected with a lifelong, incurable infection that can cause cancer, cirrhosis or death,” she told Daily Kos.

“Administering the birth dose to all infants prevents vulnerable infants from being missed at birth and also protects them throughout childhood from hepatitis B infection. The current vaccine has been used for decades and is extremely safe and effective. If it is changed, we will see children die unnecessarily.”

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine grip on HHS has grown since he’s taken over the position. From firing CDC directors who don’t agree with his agenda to altering vaccine recommendations, many changes are taking place within the groups that manage America’s health and wellness.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Hey Republicans! Would Jesus Take Away School Lunch?

Hey Republicans! Would Jesus Take Away School Lunch?

An iconic Texas band, the Austin Lounge Lizards, has a song that nails the absurd self-righteousness of Christian supremacists: "Jesus Loves Me (But He Can't Stand You)."

I think of this refrain when I behold today's right-wing proselytizers wailing that the blessed rich should not be taxed to assure that everyone has the most basic human needs. Seems very un-Jesusy to me.

One bizarre focus of their religious wrath is a wholly sensible and biblically sound national policy: subsidizing school districts to assure that every child has healthy meals to fuel their daily learning. Yes, in the Christian nationalists' book of public abominations, government feeding of children is a holy no-no. Project 2025, the Republican blueprint to impose theocratic rule over America, proclaims school meals a socialist/Marxist evil to be eradicated.

The extremists cry that if there is any free lunch "giveaway," it must be narrowly restricted to truly destitute students. But wait — publicly singling out those children would stigmatize them. Plus, how odd to hear Republicans demanding an intrusive, absurdly expensive bureaucratic process empowering government to decide who's eligible to eat!

In fact, the student lunch subsidy runs as low as 42 cents a meal, so it's far cheaper, fairer and (dare I say it?) more Christian simply to offer it to all. Indeed, the program is akin to the biblical story of Jesus providing fishes and loaves to the multitude. He imposed no income test —everyone got a fish.

Interestingly, the same lawmakers opposing 42-cent meals for kiddos today routinely and enthusiastically feed billions of our tax dollars to corporate, ethically challenged profiteers who love money above all. As I recall, Jesus couldn't stand people like that.

What Woody Guthrie Said About Inequality

Woody Guthrie's prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: "Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics."

For Guthrie, "politics" meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America's wealth and power. It's useless, he said, to expect change to come from a "choice" between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates and create a politics worth voting for.

Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged over a century ago, culminating in the Omaha Platform of 1892. This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism — and government that ranged from aloof to insane.

But lo — from that darkness, a new People's Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in U.S. history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy.

That platform reshaped America's political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing "to all the people, from whom it was originally taken." And that's what Guthrie meant by "politics."

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Trump Roasted For Gibberish Answer On ChildcareTo Economic Club

Trump Roasted For Gibberish Answer On ChildcareTo Economic Club

Donald Trump kicked off his 75-minute address to the New York Economic Club on Thursday by name-checking some of his friends in the financial community, making several questionable claims that went unchecked, and talking about “African Americans’ and Hispanic American jobs.” He closed out the event with a panelist asking him how, if elected, he would help Americans afford child care, a question he ultimately did not answer.

At one point in his early remarks Trump falsely claimed, “the typical American family lost over $28,000 due to rampant, record-setting inflation.” It is a claim he has made before, one debunked by last month by award-winning political commentator Heather Digby Parton: “Nobody knows where he got that amount and the campaign isn’t saying.”

During his speech Trump also vowed to end Russia’s war against Ukraine, if he is elected, before he is inaugurated.

The final question of the day was about the high cost of childcare and how difficult it is for parents to pay for it.

“If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?” Trump was asked by Reshma Saujani, founder of the nonprofit Girls Who Code and its campaign to help mothers, Moms First.

Trump offered parents no legislation, no ideas, no actual plan to help them pay for child care.

His response (video below) has been widely mocked.

Below is a full transcription of his response:

Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, you know, I was somebody we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about that because child care is child care, couldn’t you know, there’s something you have to have it in this country. You have to have it, but when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly, and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care we’re going to have I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just that, I just told you about, we’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again, we have to do it because right now, we’re failing nation. So we’ll take care of it.

Digby, the political commentator who debunked Trump’s $28,000 claim, commented, “They applaud this gobbledygook? He sounds like a 4th grader who didn’t read the book.”

“This is a dementia clinic,” remarked SiriusXM host Dean Obeidallah. “Corporate media’s failure to have panels on with mental health experts analyzing this gibberish is unforgivable!”

Tim Wise, senior fellow at the African American Policy Forum, remarked: “This isn’t a word salad. It’s a word sewer.”

American Independent senior political reporter Emily C. Singer said, “This is absolute word vomit. He is a f*cking moron. The fact that he is even remotely close to winning this race is an embarrassment to this country.”

“Holy f*cking sh*t,” wrote Justin Kanew, founder of the progressive site The Tennessee Holler, and a former congressional candidate. “Vance’s answer on this was terrible (‘have grandma do it, lower requirements for taking care of kids’) but somehow Trump’s is way way worse.”

Kanew added, “unserious and unprepared. They don’t care about real people’s problems.”

Berkeley professor and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich said, “Spoiler: He doesn’t actually have a plan to make childcare more affordable. But he does have a plan to establish across-the-board tariffs on imports that will lead to huge price hikes and hurt everyone but the very wealthy.”

Catherine Rampell, the Washington Post op-ed columnist, CNN commentator, and PBS NewsHour special correspondent wrote, “My job is to analyze policy. I can’t even find a complete sentence in this.”

Watch Trump’s remarks below or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World