Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, October 28, 2016

Being wronged by a corporation is painful enough, but just try getting your day in court. Most Americans don’t realize it, but our Seventh Amendment right to a fair jury trial against corporate wrongdoers has quietly been stripped from us. Instead, we are now shunted into a stacked-deck game called “Binding Mandatory Arbitration.” Proponents of the process hail it as superior to the courts — “faster, cheaper and more efficient!” they exclaim.

But does it deliver justice? It could, for the original concept of voluntary, face-to-face resolution of conflict by a neutral third party makes sense in many cases. But remember what Mae West said of her own virtue: “I used to be Snow White, then I drifted.” Today’s practice of arbitration has drifted far away from the purity of the concept.

All you really need to know about today’s process is that it’s the product of years of conceptual monkey-wrenching by corporate lobbyists, Congress, the Supreme Court and hired-gun lobbying firms looking to milk the system for steady profits. First and foremost, these fixers have turned a voluntary process into the exact opposite: mandatory. Let’s look at this mess.

— Unlike courts, arbitration is not a public system, but a private business.

— Far from being neutral, “the third-party” arbitration firms are — get this! — usually hand-picked by the corporation involved in the case, chosen specifically because they have proven records of favoring the corporation.

— The corporation also gets to choose the city or town where the case is heard, allowing it to make the case inconvenient, expensive and unfair to individuals bringing a complaint.

— Arbitrators are not required to know the law relevant to the cases they judge or follow legal precedents.

— Normal procedural rules for gathering and sharing evidence and safeguarding fairness to both parties do not apply in arbitration cases.

— Arbitration proceedings are closed to the media and the public.

— Arbitrators need not reveal the reasons for their decisions, so they are not legally accountable for errors, and the decisions set no legal precedents for guiding future corporate conduct.

— Even if an arbitrator’s decision is legally incorrect, it still is enforceable, carrying the full weight of the law.

— There is virtually no right to appeal an arbitrator’s ruling.

That adds up to a kangaroo court! Who would choose such a rigged system? No one. Which is why corporate America has resorted to brute force and skulduggery to drag you into their arbitration wringer.

  • docb

    I watched this begin and canceled my credits card could not find the verbiage that they wrote with a microscope and had to opt out instead of opt in! or agree!

    More rape of the public allowed by the Congress!

    • garryowenault

      Not so much allowed as “encouraged” or maybe just a pay back for all the money from the lobby types crawling all over the Capitol Building. And it goes on in all
      the State Capitols, also. The ONE PER CENT own us.

  • nobsartist

    Try fighting city hall. Then you will find out what real immunity is.

    Funny how a major part of our Bill of Rights revolves around “debtor prison” and taxation yet both are ignored by our kangaroo corporatism court system that we have today.

    We have yet to see how forcing us to buy health care from criminal corporations will affect suing them for malpractice or any other tort but I am sure that somewhere, buried in the new health “law”, there is something that makes them all immune from lawsuits, just like our own government is.

  • midway54

    Just another example of our Plutocracy at work.