Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, October 24, 2016

Washington (AFP) — NASA pushed back against a congressional proposal to slash more than $300 million in funding from its branch focused on climate issues.

The proposal would cut funding to NASA’s Earth Sciences division, which researches the planet’s natural systems and processes — including climate change, severe weather, and glaciers.

Republican Lamar Smith, who chairs the House of Representatives’ Science, Space and Technology Committee presented the proposal earlier in the week.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden said that the bill “threatens to set back generations worth of progress in better understanding our changing climate, and our ability to prepare for and respond to earthquakes, droughts, and storm events.”

“In addition, the bill underfunds the critical space technologies that the nation will need to lead in space, including on our journey to Mars,” he said.

NASA’s Earth Sciences division currently has a budget of $1.9 billion.

Christine McEntee, executive director of the American Geophysical Union, wrote in a letter to Smith that her organization was “extremely concerned that the reauthorization significantly cuts funding for NASA’s Earth Science Division.”

The Republican-majority House committee said in a statement that the move was an attempt to “restore balance to NASA’s budget” by putting more emphasis on space exploration.

“We must continue to invest in NASA as the only government agency responsible for space exploration,” it said.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Space, Science and Competitiveness, emphasized a similar desire to refocus NASA activities on space over Earth sciences during hearings last month.

Democratic Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson, the House committee’s ranking member, criticized what she called an attack against climate science.

“In order to serve an ideological agenda, the majority is willing to slash the science that helps us have a better understanding of our home planet” she said in The Hill, a Washington newspaper covering Congress.

In January, NASA announced that 2014 had been the warmest year on the planet since 1880.

Photo: © / Esmee van Wijk

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 The National Memo
  • Doc Lakes

    Man-made global warming cannot be proved. It’s an ever-shifting mirage of illusions conjured up to exploit the sympathies of the ignorant.

    • ralphkr

      Oh, thank you so much, Doc Lakes, for exposing the specious lies of scientific facts and sharing the wisdom of your fellow flat-earthers with me and my fellow mere mortals.

    • Sand_Cat


    • Justin Napolitano

      Of course it can be proved, you twit. If I were to inject you with cyanide you would die. You could deny that it would harm you right up until you died. The same is true for climate change in that you can deny it right up until you are 5 feet underwater. If you are not a climate scientist you should just admit you don’t have one single thing to support your ridicules comment.

  • Mondovibe

    Maybe if we just called it pollution and all the affects of toxins on our life supporting environment, now showing up in the top of the food chain, the human umbilical cord, the supposed pro lifers might get it.

  • Insinnergy

    This is going to be great.
    The military has already made statements that Climate Change is real, they are preparing for it in bases and other installations as a threat, and it is a critical National Security Issue for the US due to the potential for flooding, famine, drought, destruction and displaced people…
    Meanwhile the GOP are busy removing America’s ability to measure, understand and respond to it… thereby making the US extremely ill-prepared and vulnerable to this critical threat.
    The Republican gun is aimed squarely at their own dick.
    Grab the popcorn.

  • johninPCFL

    No surprise here. Lamar Smith is a “God will always protect us” anti-science nutjob. Maybe he should talk to Sarah “The End Times Are A Comin'” Palin?