We’re still having trouble, of late, keeping up with all the chicanery, dirty tricks and skulduggery now rolling across the country. So here, once again, is our very quick take on just some of the most noteworthy items over the past few days that you’ll want to keep in mind as we creep towards Election Day on Tuesday…
—CBS Radio Affiliate in PA Inaccurately Says Photo ID Needed To Vote: “CBS Pittsburgh radio station KDKA…is running an ad claiming that voters will need photo identification to go to the polls on November 6th, despite the fact that while voters may be asked to show ID, it is not required to vote. The ad aired on October 26, “despite the fact that it’s been almost a month since the PA courts determined that no photo ID will be necessary to vote this year in the Keystone State. The ad says: “The Voter ID law was just recently signed by the governor… You’re not going to be allowed to vote unless you present an acceptable photo identification. Get to a PennDOT licensing center and get a photo ID at the driver’s license center.” The ad is completely inaccurate.
—Broward County, FL Early Votes Disappearing?: Just one of the many reasons we advise against early voting, unless it’s absolutely necessary: “An analysis of the unofficial totals by early voting location on the Broward Supervisor of Elections website from Saturday, compared to the tallies posted on Sunday, shows that in one location, the E. Pat Larkins Community Center, located on Martin Luther King Blvd. in Pompano Beach, the revised totals showed 1,003 fewer votes. The initial tally reported from the polling place in the heavily black neighborhood showed 2,945 votes, but the revised tally was 1,401. Across the 17 Broward polling locations, 15 saw their vote totals revised, mostly by minute amounts of between 1 and 7 votes. But the three more significant changes, including the addition of 398 votes in Tamarac (a racially mixed community) and adding 99 votes to the totals from Pompano Beach City Hall, whose demographic is majority white.” … Political consultant David Brown, who is working for three Broward candidates, “said that when he inquired about the numbers, he was told by the elections office that the changes had resulted from a ‘computer glitch.'”
—Loophole in FL Law May Disenfranchise Absentee Voters: Not sure this is necessarily in the “War on Democracy” category, but Michael C. Herron and Daniel A. Smith have found a very interesting, if troubling, quirk in FL law that could result in legal voters being disenfranchised if they cast their absentee ballot and then move to a different county and re-register there before Election Day. Best to read their take to fully appreciate it, though it makes us wonder how many other states around the country have a similar loophole in their absentee ballot and registration laws and how many voters could actually be affected by such a loophole.
–Romney Campaign Training WI Poll Watchers to Lie: “One blatant falsehood occurs on page 5 of the training packet, which informed poll watchers that any ‘person [who] has been convicted of treason, a felony, or bribery’ isn’t eligible to vote. This is not true.” … “The training also encouraged volunteers to deceive election workers and the public about who they were associated with. On page 3 of the packet, Romney poll workers were instructed to hide their affiliation with the campaign and told to sign in at the polls as a ‘concerned citizen’ instead.” After the story was published, “the Romney campaign’s schedule of poll watcher trainings was changed to private.”
Update: Romney Poll Watchers also being mistrained in Iowa, being told that photo ID is required to vote there. It isn’t.
—Keep an Eye on Colorado: So recommends Bev Harris of Black Box Voting, and for very good reason. Not only is CO a key battleground this year, said to be a virtual tie in most of the polls, but “Colorado election integrity and transparency is now officially out the window, with a series of corruption protection rules and new laws.” Among those laws? Ballots that can be tied back to the voter; a new law that makes ballots and other election materials no longer public records, at least not before 45 days after an election; extreme Tea Party right-wing Sec. of State Scott Gessler’s new rules that “remove requirements for continuous video surveillance” under the guise of “cost-saving”; the reduction in the number of so-called tamper-evident seals on voting machines; and more…