Tag: challenge
Rep. Jasmine Crockett

Nancy Mace Melts Down, Challenges Jasmine Crockett To Fistfight

On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee's organizational meeting to kick off the 119th Congress briefly devolved into chaos as one Republican member threatened to fight a Democratic member during the latter's allotted time.

While Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) was speaking about Rep. Nancy Mace's (R-SC) crusade against transgender people — which led to Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE.) being forced to use the men's bathroom in the House of Representatives — Mace blew up at Crockett and appeared to challenge her to a fist fight.

"Somebody's campaign coffers really are struggling right now, so she gonna keep saying 'trans trans trans' so that people will feel threatened," Crockett said, tossing her hair as she spoke. "And chile, listen, I want y'all to tell me why—"

At that point, Mace began shouting over Crockett as she spoke.

"Do not call me a child. I am no child. Don't even start! I am a grown woman! i am 47 years old! I have broken more glass ceilings than you ever have," Mace yelled as Crockett repeated that she was "reclaiming my time."

"If you want to take it outside, we can do that," Mace said as she slammed her mic down on a table.

At that point, Rep. James Comer (R-KY), who chairs the Oversight Committee, repeatedly banged his gavel, called "order" and demanded the two stop arguing. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-FL), who sits on the committee, posted to Bluesky that Comer ruled "threatening violence against another member is okay, as long as it's in the form of question."

Crockett: Somebody’s campaign coffers are struggling right now so she’s going to keep saying trans trans trans.. Child listen Mace: I am no child! Do not call me a child. I am a grown woman. If you want to take it outside

[image or embed]

— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) January 14, 2025 at 9:09 PM

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Joe Biden

What Biden Must Do To Win The Debates

Until he challenged Donald Trump to debate, President Joe Biden seemed in denial about the state of the race. He'd been saying for some time that the polls were wrong. This was disturbing for a couple of reasons, the first being that, if anything, the polls have underpredicted, not overpredicted, Trump's support. That was true in 2016 and 2020. This year, the polling aggregate over the past several months has shown an incredibly tight race with Trump narrowly in the lead. Biden's implied message of "Relax, nothing to see here" was alarming.

Debates with a "f—-ing moron" (to quote a former secretary of state under Trump) are not ideal, but there aren't a lot of good choices at the moment. Our fate as a country depends on getting the attention of voters who would rather not think about politics. Debates, as stupid and dismaying as they have become, may be the best vehicle to secure their eyeballs.

Trump and his allies have way oversold the Biden-is-senile message. A fair share of voters have come to think that he is not just old but drooling and unable to function. The truth is that, though his voice is getting croaky, he messes up words and names sometimes, and he walks quite stiffly, he is very much compos mentis. He has demonstrated this again and again — as when he traveled to Kyiv or to Jerusalem. Biden was so sharp at the SOTU that Trump accused him of being drugged. A live debate will be a crucible.

This is not to suggest that all Biden needs to do is stay vertical for 90 minutes. If Biden has a serious brain freeze or incoherent digression, he and we are in terrible trouble. If the same happens to Trump, the consequences for him would likely be less dire because his cult is fanatical, though it would remind undecided voters that Trump is only three years younger than Biden — and it is Trump who had a parent with Alzheimer's disease.

This rare moment of voters' attention cannot be squandered. An April Pew survey found that 42 percent of voters overall rated Trump as a good or great president, while 11 percent said he was average. By contrast, only 28 percent said Biden was good or great, with 21 percent rating him as average. The debate is a chance to remind viewers of how disastrous Trump's first term was and to warn them about his threats to "terminate" the Constitution in a second. It's a chance to show the sort of dangerous and criminal associates Trump has surrounded himself with, from Michael Flynn to Marjorie Taylor Greene to Nick Fuentes to Stephen Miller to Jeffrey Clark to Richard Grenell.

In the first debate in 2020, Trump attempted a psyop on Biden. He planned to be so provocative and bullying that Biden would be reduced to stuttering. (He may also have been trying to infect Biden with COVID.) It backfired. Now Biden has his own psyop opportunity — to remind voters that Trump has promised to pardon all the January 6 defendants, and to remind Trump and the country of all the former Trump hires who've said he is unfit. This will make Trump angry and vengeful. He'll probably say things that reveal his pathological vanity. He'll say they are "overrated" or losers or part of the deep state — to which the obvious retort is, "Really? You seem to hire a lot of incompetent people!" Or, "Out of 44 Cabinet members you hired in four years, only four are supporting you." Biden needs to inform voters about something important — Trump's own people call him dangerous to the nation.

Above all, Biden needs to have some better responses ready for the inevitable questions about the state of the economy. Instead of acknowledging what people are experiencing at the supermarket and in their monthly rent or mortgage payments, Biden argues with the facts. He denied on CNN that the economy is a problem, suggesting that while Americans may say the economy is poor, "they're personally in good shape." This isn't true. According to CNN, 53% of Americans say they are dissatisfied with their personal financial situation. And then he resorted to the "greedy capitalists" canard, declaring in February that there are "still too many corporations in America ripping people off. Price gouging, junk fees, greedflation, shrinkflation."

Corporations are no more greedy than they were before the pandemic. Besides, if the problem were greed, how is another Biden term going to eliminate one of the seven deadly sins? Biden needs to acknowledge how tough inflation has been and then tell a story about supply chains, stimulus (yes, even admitting that both the Trump and Biden administrations pumped money into the economy — because it seemed necessary to avert an even worse outcome), and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He needs to show how much progress we have made since 2022, when inflation really did reach nine percent. He should boast that we've reduced it to 3.4 percent without triggering a recession.

The majority of the American people have never liked Trump. Biden has given himself two opportunities to convince them that granting Trump another term, however tepid their feelings about the incumbent, would be a disaster.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Kevin McCarthy

Kevin McCarthy Is Taking Revenge -- On House Republicans

From primary challenges to getting blackballed from House Republicans caucuses, the eight Republicans who ousted former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy are feeling the blowback. His allies—and he has many of them—are making sure of that.

The Republican Main Street Caucus and Republican Governance Group have quietly booted Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, whose attention-getting stunts seem to be wearing thin with her colleagues. “She really wants to be a caucus of one. So we obliged her,” one House Republican told CNN.

Mace is facing a serious primary challenger, as is Rep. Bob Good of Virginia, the new chair of the Freedom Caucus and one of the anti-McCarthy eight. “A well-connected GOP outside spending group is planning to play in the [primary] races,” CNN reports, and McCarthy is likely to be directly involved on behalf of the challengers as well.

Where the real hammer is falling on this eight is in their fundraising. Others, including Reps. Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Andy Biggs of Arizona, and Eli Crane, acknowledge that the big donors aren’t taking their calls anymore. Burchett told CNN’s Manu Raju that he “absolutely” had seen his donations dry up. “Some very wealthy folks, and they’ve been very kind to me in the past,” Burchett said of donors who had dropped him. “And I hope that we can mend the fences,” he added. Good luck to him on that one.

Crane of Arizona told Raju he was feeling a fundraising hit. “Yeah, that’s definitely a reality,” he said. “And I think anybody that participated in that knew that going forward.”

He’s right. They knew what they were doing, and they asked for this. Booting McCarthy meant ousting their most effective fundraiser. Ousting him meant pissing off all those big donors he’s been cultivating all these years. They’re friends of Kev, and they are happy to help him get his revenge.

Speaking of revenge, that’s what the ouster was all about. The spearhead of the chaos, Rep. Matt Gaetz, admitted it to a colleague in private correspondence obtained by The Daily Beast. According to the outlet, “Gaetz indicated to a friend that his effort to undercut, isolate, and ultimately remove McCarthy was, indeed, payback for the ethics probe.” That would be the House Ethics Committee investigation into Gaetz for alleged sex crimes, drug use, and campaign finance violations, to name a few.

Do any of Gaetz’s pals blame him for putting them in this position? Of course not. “I’m too busy working for the Lowcountry and helping elect President Trump to worry about Kevin McCarthy’s puppet,” Mace told CNN. “The DC swamp doesn’t want me back—too bad. I don’t work for them, I work for the people of the First Congressional District and no one else.”

The rest of the GOP conference loves to see McCarthy’s revenge. “If I’m those folks, one of the things that would scare the crap out of me more than anything else is an unhinged McCarthy,” a Republican lawmaker told CNN. “The guy’s the most prolific fundraiser, you’ve got a massive group of donors across the country that are pissed off about what’s happening, and you’ve got these boneheads that have caused it.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Elizabeth Warren’s Candidacy Generates Excitement, But Will It Be Enough?

The entry of Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard-professor-turned-consumer-advocate, into the U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts has created a stir among Democratic activists and donors, but she faces a difficult challenge in unseating Republican Sen. Scott Brown. While she has never previously run for office, her high profile as a regulator and tough critic of the financial industry has progressives buzzing that she could retake the seat held for four decades by the late liberal lion Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Warren is a darling of the anti-corporate progressives who are disenchanted with the Democratic Party’s close ties to Wall Street. A law professor at Harvard, she served as the special advisor for the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and was the first chairman of the Congressional Oversight Panel, which oversaw the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Most politicians claim they are dedicated to the middle class, but her record adds rare substance to this promise. As she greeted commuters at a Boston subway station to launch her campaign Wednesday, she said,

“There’s been a lot of very powerful interests who have tried to shut me down, squeeze me, push me sideways, and so far it just hasn’t worked. I’m willing to throw my body in front of a bus to try to stop bad ideas that are going to be harmful to the middle class.”

But now, in an already-crowded Democratic pool, Warren might have to appeal to those same powerful interests in order to compete with other Senate hopefuls. If she does make it through the primary, she has to square off with the popular Sen. Brown, who already has more than $10 million in his campaign account. Much of Brown’s campaign donations come from the financial sector — his top contributors include Goldman Sachs and the Boston-based financial company FMR Corp. If Warren accepted similar donations — although it is highly unlikely such interests would consider supporting her, given her record — she would be opening herself up to claims of hypocrisy. Instead, she will most likely rely on smaller contributions from progressive organizations, unions, and voters who are excited about her campaign.

“I think it’s pretty clear she’s going to run the classic, grassroots campaign here in Massachusetts,” said Mary Anne Marsh, a longtime Democratic operative in the state. “That means she’s going to rely on folks here to give low-dollar donations here a number of times.”

Given the amount of enthusiasm surrounding her candidacy, jilted progressives might be willing to give her the necessary money and support. People on the left are excited at the prospect of having a dedicated consumer advocate in Washington, hoping that she would stand up to the corporate interests that dominate much of policy-making. As John Nichols of The Nationwrites,

It’s not just that a Warren candidacy could provide Democrats with a needed pick-up of a currently Republican-held seat — although that’s a big deal for the party, which faces a dismal electoral map in 2012. If the chief advocate for real banking reform and the development of a federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau runs and defeats U.S. Scott Brown, R-Massachusetts, she will instantly become an essential spokesperson for progressive values in national economic, regulatory, and fiscal policy debates.

The calculus extends even further with Warren, however. Her ability to grab the spotlight and use it to push the discourse to the left on economic issues that the media so frequently neglects makes the prospect of her candidacy and Senate service potentially transformative for movements and a party that will — no matter what the 2012 presidential election result — begin pondering sometime next year the challenge of identifying leaders of the post-Obama era.

There’s something to be said for this level of optimism and excitement surrounding a Democratic candidate, particularly at a time when liberals are facing a tough electoral climate. Warren could reinvigorate a disillusioned progressive movement; but is it possible to win an election in 2012 without appealing to the financial sector for hefty donations?

If Warren secures the Democratic nomination, the Senate race could turn into a battle between Wall Street and progressives. But at the end of the day, relying on a wholly grassroots fundraising scheme might not be enough against the wallets of the big banks.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World