Tag: restrictions
MAGA Boosters Bummed As Trump Floats Looser Marijuana Regulation

MAGA Boosters Bummed As Trump Floats Looser Marijuana Regulation

Prominent MAGA figures are in a frenzy over reports that President Donald Trump will review federal restrictions on marijuana, and warn that any loosening could lead to societal chaos.

Trump confirmed he’s considering reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I drug—currently grouped with ecstasy, heroin, and LSD—to a Schedule III substance, similar to anabolic steroids, tech billionaire Elon Musk’s favored ketamine, and testosterone. The president appeared conflicted, weighing the potential medical benefits against possible side effects.

“Medical, for pain and various things, I’ve heard some pretty good things, but for other things, I’ve heard some pretty bad things,” he told reporters Monday.

Reclassification wouldn’t legalize marijuana nationwide, but it would relax federal restrictions, broaden medical research, and allow for tax breaks for some marijuana companies. Currently, the federal government classifies weed as a “drug with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”

Trump has flirted with changing marijuana policy before. In 2024, he said he would support a Florida amendment to legalize weed statewide—a measure that ultimately failed.

But his recent comments on weed have many of Trump’s allies furious, framing marijuana as a gateway to an immoral and lazy society while glorifying … alcohol and tobacco?

“Our society thrived when everyone was smoking cigarettes and drinking whiskey. We became the most powerful nation in the world with liquor and nicotine,” The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh hilariously posted on X. “No country of potheads has ever thrived, or ever achieved anything at all. Every city that legalized it became an even bigger shithole basically overnight.”

Other MAGA luminaries are clutching their pearls and whining about traditional values.

“America deserves better, our kids deserve better, I don’t want to have to be smelling weed anytime I take my kids anywhere in a city or a national park,” MAGA podcaster Jack Posobiec complained on his podcast.

Conservative commentator Michael Knowles echoed the critique to Axios, calling marijuana the “liberal intoxicant of choice” and contrasting it with “traditional pleasures” like tobacco and alcohol.

“The left is more comfortable just kind of vegging out, but they should not be, because sloth is bad for the individual and for society,” he added, conveniently ignoring the fact that somebody can and do abuse both substances.

These critiques go beyond tired Reefer Madness scare tactics. Instead, they offer a glimpse into MAGA’s cultural blueprint. In their often skewed worldviews, idleness or anything resembling a stoner lifestyle is framed as un-American and a betrayal of the cigar-and-whiskey archetype of rugged masculinity they celebrate.

The debate is also deeply rooted in political signaling. Marijuana has become shorthand for liberal excess, while tobacco and alcohol hold conservative credibility—a symbolic battleground in the broader culture war. Every puff or sip is seen as a marker of ideological loyalty, dividing behaviors along partisan lines.

Yet MAGA isn’t monolithic. Libertarian-leaning groups and those skeptical of Big Pharma say they find the rescheduling of cannabis appealing, especially as a nontraditional treatment for specific medical conditions, like PTSD.

“Rescheduling marijuana doesn’t legalize it, but it does allow for more medical research,” said MAGA influencer Rogan O’Handley, who added that such a change would hurt “Big Pharma” and “Big Prison.”

Trump’s “openness to rescheduling is research-driven and shows he’s listening to the countless veterans whose lives have been changed for the better by its medicinal benefits,” MAGA influencer CJ Pearson wrote.

Currently, 24 states have legalized recreational marijuana, and 40 allow its medical use. Trump reclassifying marijuana could give the booming cannabis industry a significant boost and expand access for consumers and researchers alike.

Meanwhile, MAGA’s internal feud rages on. For now, it’s entertaining to see Trump’s top groupies tear each other apart over weed—even if they’ve mostly forgotten other controversies surrounding Dear Leader.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Governor Orders Mandatory Water Restrictions In California

Governor Orders Mandatory Water Restrictions In California

By Matt Stevens And Chris Megerian, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

LAKE TAHOE, California — California Governor Jerry Brown, standing on a patch of brown grass in the Sierra Nevada that is usually covered with several feet of snow, on Wednesday announced the first mandatory water restrictions in California history.

“It’s a different world,” he said. “We have to act differently.”

Brown was on hand Wednesday as state officials took stock of historically abysmal levels of snowpack in the Sierra Nevada amid the state’s grinding drought.

Brown ordered the State Water Resources Control Board to implement mandatory restrictions to reduce water usage by 25 percent. The water savings are expected to amount to 1.5 million acre-feet of water over the next nine months.

Brown’s plan would also:

  • Require golf courses, cemeteries, and other large landscaped spaces to reduce water consumption.
  • Replace 50 million square feet of lawn statewide with drought-tolerant landscaping as part of a partnership with local governments.
  • Create statewide rebate program to replace old appliance with more water- and energy-efficient ones.
  • Require new homes to have water-efficient drip irrigation if developers want to use potable water for irrigation.
  • Ban the water of ornamental grass on public street medians.
  • Call on water agencies to implement new pricing models that discourage excessive water use.

“It is such an unprecedented lack of snow,” said Frank Gehrke, chief of the California Cooperative Snow Survey Program. He’s been attending the snowpack measurements since 1987 and said he had never before seen the ground barren of snow on April first. “It’s way below the records.”

It’s another foreboding sign for a state languishing in a drought, as the wet season winds to a close.

Electronic readings on Wednesday at about 100 stations across the Sierra showed that the water content of the snow was only about five percent of the state average for April first, the day on which snowpack is normally considered at its peak. Official manual readings will be announced Wednesday afternoon.

Early data show the snowpack is lower than any year since 1950, when record-keeping began. Never before has the amount of water in the snow on April first dipped lower than 25 percent of the historical average for that day.

Snowpack accounts for about 30 percent of the state’s water supply, and other sources, including reservoirs and rainfall totals, have recently improved. Still, officials from the Department of Water Resources say the state of the snowpack, which melts and replenishes California’s reservoirs, means there will be virtually no runoff this spring or summer when the rain stops and temperatures rise.

“This is sort of uncharted territory,” said department spokesman Doug Carlson, calling the situation “dismal.”

Wednesday’s reading will be state water officials’ fourth manual snow survey this year at Phillips Station, about 90 miles east of Sacramento. Carlson said he visited the area a few days ago.

“I can tell you what the reading will be tomorrow: Zero, as in Sierra Nada,” he said.

The station traditionally averages more than 60 inches of snow on April first, he said.

The snow levels in the Sierra have declined each month since manual surveying began on December 30. That initial electronic reading showed that the snow’s water content was 50 percent of normal for the date. A month later, the water content was down to 25 percent of average, and in March, it was only 19 percent.

“It does leave questions about where the water will come from,” Carlson said. “Will there be enough of it? It will probably have to come from groundwater again…and that brings in a whole other set of problems and complications since the groundwater seems to be over-tapped.”

Relatively meager rainfall, combined with unusually warm weather has kept snowfall limited, officials said.

At the eight stations in the northern Sierra where the Department of Water Resources measures precipitation, about 32 inches of rain — 76 percent of average — have fallen since the water year began in October.

Sacramento has seen temperatures as much as six degrees above normal each month for the past 15 months, a National Weather Service spokesman said.

The rest of the state’s water picture, though, doesn’t look as dreary.

Major storms that hit California in December and February were warm and fell as rain rather than snow. Though precipitation is below the state’s historical average, the northern Sierra stations have already gotten more rain since October than during all of the 2013-14 water year, which lasts from October first to September 30.

That rain has helped refill the state’s reservoirs. As of Monday, Lake Oroville — the keystone reservoir of the California State Water Project, which delivers water from Northern California to the south — was at 51 percent of its capacity, compared with 49 percent a year ago. Lake Shasta, the state’s largest reservoir, had about 150 billion gallons more water in it Monday than it did a year ago.

In early March, state officials also announced that customers of the State Water Project will get 20 percent of their contract requests, compared with only five percent in 2014.

But Central Valley farmers without senior water rights are likely to get no supplies from the valley’s big federal irrigation project for the second year in a row. And in April, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which imports supplies from Northern California and the Colorado River, is expected to consider rationing regional water deliveries, as it did during the 2007-09 drought. That decision will have a ripple effect throughout the Southland as local agencies react, likely by increasing water rates and adopting stricter conservation measure.

In a first step toward bolstering such measures, the State Water Resources Control Board beefed up its emergency drought regulations this month, directing urban agencies to limit the number of days residents can water their yards.

The board also warned that it will impose tougher restrictions in coming months if local agencies don’t ramp up conservation efforts.

At the time, Board Chairwoman Felicia Marcus called the state of California’s miniscule snowpack “just terrifying.”

“We are not seeing the level of stepping up and ringing the alarm bells that the situation warrants,” Marcus said.

Brown and lawmakers have responded to the drought with new legislation, including a $1 billion plan the governor signed last week.

It includes $127.8 million for food and water supplies and immediate measures to protect the environment from the effects of the drought. Most of the funding is for long-term projects such as recycling sewage water, improving treatment facilities and supporting desalination plants.

Photo: Brian van der Brug via Los Angeles Times/TNS

Show Me The Fraud

Show me the fraud.

Show me the hordes of college students using fake IDs to cast votes for president.

Show me the poor people boarding buses and trains or walking for miles so they can cast a vote in the wrong precinct using somebody else’s name.

Show me throngs of citizens spending entire days traveling from precinct to precinct to cast their votes over and over in the same election.

Until Republicans can produce these felons, any attempt to restrict voters’ rights by conjuring such mythical malefactors is partisanship of the ugliest and most dangerous kind.

Last week, U.S. Rep. John Lewis — a civil rights hero who earned his stake in this debate with his own blood — wrote an op-ed for The New York Times about the wave of Republican-backed voting restrictions in state legislatures. The title of his piece, “A Poll Tax by Another Name,” is enough to send chills up the spine of anyone who remembers a time when African-Americans risked their lives to vote.

Lewis took aim at the slew of photo ID mandates passed to prevent voter fraud that no one can prove exists.

“Indiana was unable to cite a single instance of actual voter impersonation at any point in its history,” he wrote. “Likewise, in Kansas, there were far more reports of U.F.O. sightings than allegations of voter fraud in the past decade. These theories of systematic fraud are really unfounded fears being exploited to threaten the franchise.”

In the battleground state of Ohio, where I live, the far-right extremists in the state Legislature took a breather in their march across women’s bodies to pass a slew of voting restrictions.

The voting law’s sponsor, state Rep. Robert Mecklenborg, said last March the legislation was necessary “to combat voter fraud and the perception of fraud.” No one — not county boards of elections, the League of Women Voters or former secretaries of state — could cite a single instance of voter impersonation in Ohio.

This did not deter Mecklenborg and his fellow Republicans from plowing right over the voting rights of potentially hundreds of thousands of Ohio voters.

“I believe it happens, but it’s proving a negative,” Mecklenborg told reporters after the March vote. “It’s impossible to prove a negative. How do you prove that fraud doesn’t exist there?”

The law has sparked a petition drive to repeal it through a ballot referendum.

We won’t be hearing Mecklenborg pontificate anymore about nonexistent voter fraud, because he’s no longer a member of the Ohio House of Representatives. He resigned last month after he made headlines across the country for driving while intoxicated.

Mecklenborg, who also sponsored the most radical anti-abortion legislation in the country this year, was arrested in the wee hours of the morning in Indiana, where he was driving with an expired license in a car with temporary Kentucky plates in the company of a young woman who was not his wife. He managed to hide this arrest from the public for a whole two months.

What does any of this have to do with voter fraud? Absolutely everything when you’re claiming to be the standard-bearer for authenticity.

The Republican majority in the Ohio Legislature wanted to pass a photo ID mandate, too, but one of its own — Secretary of State Jon Husted — publicly opposed it.

Husted paid a price for this independence.

GOP leadership punished him by removing a provision for online voter registration. Republicans also worked the refs at The Wall Street Journal, which ran an opinion piece about Husted, titled “Ohio’s Pro-Fraud Republican.”

Husted has more plans to buck his party’s leadership. Ohio’s new voting law eliminates the requirement for poll workers to help voters find their right precinct. Husted said he will instruct poll workers to offer help to any voter who needs it.

Imagine that. Issuing an order to defy your own party just so voters can find the right place to vote.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World