Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019

In Tea Party Senate Candidate’s Dissertation, A Nostalgia For A Populist Christian Nation

In Tea Party Senate Candidate’s Dissertation, A Nostalgia For A Populist Christian Nation

The following is reprinted with permission from Religion Dispatches. Follow RD on Facebook or Twitter for daily updates.

Ben Sasse, winner of last week’s Republican Senate primary in Nebraska and likely the next senator from that state, is a Tea Party hero with an unusual credential: a PhD in history from Yale.

Sasse — a proud anti-choice activist, homeschooler, and opponent of Obamacare and its “entire failed worldview” — bills himself as an outsider to politics, with an expertise in “business turnaround projects” for such powerhouses as Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey and Company.

Even before winning the primary, Sasse had been the subject of favorable profiles in both the National Review (“Obamacare’s Cornhusker Nemesis”) and the Weekly Standard (“A Virtuoso Pol from Nebraska?”). In a reverential interview, Glenn Beck told the candidate, “I can hear the Constitution running through your veins.”

If the Constitution could actually flow through the human circulatory system, there’s one part I might imagine Sasse omitting: the Establishment Clause, or at least the Establishment Clause as interpreted by the Warren Court, whose church-state decisions of the early 1960s form the lynchpin of Sasse’s 2004 doctoral dissertation.

It’s that dissertation, not the right’s adulation of their Ivy-educated everyman, that offers the greatest insight into Sasse’s political orientation, one in which religion — and, more critically, “elite” dismissal of it — takes center stage in the story of America and the rise of the modern conservative movement.

In 2004’s “The Anti-Madalyn Majority: Secular Left, Religious Right, and the Rise of Reagan’s America,” Sasse argues that journalists and historians have misapprehended, and indeed misreported, the story of the rise of the modern religious right. His historical marker is not placed — as many histories of the movement have placed it — at the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan, whose candidacy was supported by Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority and the coalition of religious leaders Reagan notoriously embraced.

Rather, he argues, not unpersuasively, that the roots of the modern religious right lie in the 1962 and 1963 Supreme Court decisions striking down mandatory public school prayer and Bible reading. Those decisions, Sasse maintains, touched a nerve among what he calls the “masses,” by which he means Americans horrified by rapid cultural changes, a reaction that “elites” dismissed as the backwater views of an unrepresentative, anti-modernist minority.

By failing to recognize what Sasse characterizes as a spontaneous, grassroots reaction to “judicial tyranny” (yes, Sasse documents the use of that term in the Cold War era), intellectual and journalistic elites, along with the entire Democratic Party, failed to grasp the true motivation of religious conservatives, or the political turns they would force the country to take.

Madalyn Murray O’Hair is the odd ghost hovering over Sasse’s project. It’s almost as though the exhibitionist atheist is, for Sasse, a persistent bogeyman in American culture, despite O’Hair’s death a decade earlier and the rising prominence of dozens of more staid advocates of atheism and secularism. Indeed, Sasse admits, in spite of the title of his prize-winning thesis and the many pixels he devoted to O’Hair herself (whom Sasse repeatedly calls “Madalyn” much like conservatives refer to a Clinton as “Hillary”), that she was merely a “symbol” and “never really the substance of the threat.” Yet, he maintains, “she was an important catalyst in the formation of a particular incarnation of a worldview, with a long pedigree in American history, that godless elites were stealing the nation from godly masses.”

That worldview, as becomes evident, is one with which Sasse is deeply sympathetic. As a historical matter, Sasse is correct that much of the reaction to the Court’s Establishment Clause cases was rooted in Christian anti-communist movements (which I fully agree formed an underappreciated foundation for the modern religious right). But even though the historical record is rife with demagogues who stirred up anti-communist (and then, anti-secularist) passions, in his thesis Sasse claims instead that this grassroots reaction was sua sponte.

Only later in the dissertation — after documenting, in fascinating detail, congressional hearings on a proposed Constitutional amendment to permit school prayer — does Sasse concede that reporters “did uncover some other unseemly conservative allies, such as the John Birch Society, Billy Hargis, and Gerald L.K. Smith,” founder of the anti-Semitic Christian Nationalist Crusade.

But before that concession, Sasse spends considerable time with the records of the House Judiciary Committee, and the mail it received from what Sasse portrays as the country’s salt and light citizens opposing “activist judges” on the Supreme Court.

At the center of this episode was a Republican congressman from New York, Frank Becker, a Catholic, who first proposed the school prayer amendment in the wake of the 1962 Supreme Court decision in Engel v. Vitale. Throughout, Sasse portrays Becker as a true believer, not a calculating politician, whose tenacious focus derived less from a studied assessment of his audience than from his heartfelt conviction that the hope of America lay in its special relationship with the Almighty, and in the nation’s resolve to doggedly oppose the most formidable system of atheistic imperialism the world had ever known.

Becker, depicted here as a David to a Democratic Goliath, was stymied by the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Emanuel Celler (who Sasse repeatedly reminds us was Jewish), who refused to hold hearings on Becker’s proposal. But Becker was so committed to defending God and country, Sasse writes, that he then devoted his energies to educating the public about the mechanics of a discharge petition to force the chairman’s hand. “There was something almost Shakespearean,” Sasse notes, “about a man claiming to represent the great majority in defense of the great tradition now having to depend on an arcane legislative procedure.”

Sasse insists that the public outcry for a school prayer amendment was a “genuinely ‘bottom-up’ movement,” citing letters and other documents in the Judiciary Committee trove. A high-school student in Wyoming, for example, “implored all faithful countrymen ‘to remember that when Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany, his first move toward world conquest was the expulsion of religion from the schools.”

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 6

3 responses to “In Tea Party Senate Candidate’s Dissertation, A Nostalgia For A Populist Christian Nation”

  1. dmhlt_66 says:

    This is a very well researched and informative piece of reporting.

  2. Sand_Cat says:

    No doubt Sasse – like almost all other religious fanatics – completely ignored the outright oppression and abuse – not just dismissal – of agnostic, atheist, other religious (especially Jewish), and Christian dissenting thought that was and remains all around him in order to vent his outrage at the alleged “dismissal” of religion – also known as respect for the First Amendment and the world’s history of religious persecution – by “elites,” i.e., those actually concerned with evidence, reality, and liberty to do something other than the majority of other people want in matters of religion.

  3. charleo1 says:

    Shame on Ben Sasse, and others fortunate enough to get a world class education, and then use it in such a dishonest, misleading way. Evangelical, Mega Church, Protestantism, sorely needs lifting up out of the muck, and the mire, of the morally bankrupt, and slick political hucksterism of their absolutely shameless, “ministers.” Serving not God, nor their flock, but some of the most dangerous, and dishonest political organizations in American politics. Growing up in the heart of the Bible belt in the 60s, where legendary icons such as Oral Roberts, or Rex Humbard, got their start as iterate preachers that made their living traveling across the mid-west faith healing, and living on the donations of equally poor, but genuinely God fearing religious folk. Much more interested in getting into heaven, than getting one of the Koch Brother’s government lap dogs elected Governor, or sent to Congress. And I can tell you, I have a great deal of affinity, and sadness for these people, because I still have a lot of family back in those same hills of SW. Missouri, and Northern Arkansas. Who are absolutely every bit as committed to their Christian God, today as their Parents, and Grandparents were, when Jimmy Swaggert came thru, preaching from the back of a flat bed truck he used to drive around. But, it’s the message they are receiving that’s changed. A man’s politics was not a proper subject to discuss, in the Lord’s House. Today, if you join the millions who listen to the grand Reverend Hagee, or the dementia affected Pat Robertson, on a weekly basis. All you will hear is apocalyptic fear mongering, about the assault Christians are under, from the Godless secularists. Who also by no small coincidence, fail to tow the corporate line. And they are, “very concerned,” they’re flocks are told, that these, “people,” are destroying the America God used to bless. Thereby, every malady, natural or otherwise, is blamed on the political opposition to the monied elite. It’s the kind of activity God promised a special place in Hell, for those who chose to use His word, and His Flock, in such a manner. A section of the Bible, they no longer visit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.