By Henry Decker

This Week In Crazy: ‘Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

April 11, 2014 12:00 am Category: Memo Pad, Politics, Slideshow 89 Comments A+ / A-
This Week In Crazy: ‘Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

Welcome to “This Week In Crazy,” The National Memo’s weekly update on the wildest attacks, conspiracy theories, and other loony behavior from the increasingly unhinged right wing. Starting with number five:

5. Jim DeMint

Jim DeMint

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Heritage Foundation leader Jim DeMint continued to make a mockery of the term “think tank” this week, when he offered a spectacularly stupid theory about the Civil War.

During an interview on the Christian radio show Vocal Point, the conservative think-tank leader uncorked the following explanation of how the government didn’t actually have much to do with freeing the slaves:

Well the reason that the slaves were eventually freed was the Constitution, it was like the conscience of the American people. Unfortunately there were some court decisions like Dred Scott and others that defined some people as property, but the Constitution kept calling us back to ‘all men are created equal and we have inalienable rights’ in the minds of God. But a lot of the move to free the slaves came from the people, it did not come from the federal government. It came from a growing movement among the people, particularly people of faith, that this was wrong. People like Wilberforce who persisted for years because of his faith and because of his love for people. So no liberal is going to win a debate that big government freed the slaves. In fact, it was Abraham Lincoln, the very first Republican, who took this on as a cause and a lot of it was based on a love in his heart that comes from God.

Welcome to Jim DeMint’s America: Where big government can’t claim credit for ending slavery, but it can stop women from talking about abortion on the internet.

Of course, as Ian Millhiser points out at Think Progress, DeMint’s argument seems to overlook the fact that the Thirteenth Amendment came less from the love in Lincoln’s heart, and more from the “massive big government program known as the ‘Civil War.'” And DeMint seems to have confused the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence. And William Wilberforce died three decades before the abolition of slavery in the U.S.

But then, nobody has ever confused DeMint with a historian.

Pages →  1 2 3 4 5

This Week In Crazy: ‘Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right Reviewed by on . Welcome to “This Week In Crazy,” The National Memo’s weekly update on the wildest attacks, conspiracy theories, and other loony behavior from the increasingly u Welcome to “This Week In Crazy,” The National Memo’s weekly update on the wildest attacks, conspiracy theories, and other loony behavior from the increasingly u Rating: 0

More by Henry Decker

Midterm Roundup: How Democrats Could Still Win

Get all of the latest news from the campaign trail.

Read more...

Midterm Roundup: Coakley Collapsing Again?

Get all of the latest news from the campaign trail.

Read more...

WATCH: GOP Fearmongering Jumps The Shark

See the RNC's outrageous closing argument.

Read more...

Tags

Comments

  • http://www.examiner.com/political-rebuttal-in-national/michael-ross Michael Ross

    Don’t mind me, just some honorable mentions:

    My pick for the craziest:
    Lee Bright: Bashar Al-Assad is a role model for Republicans:
    http://www.examiner.com/article/lee-bright-vows-to-fight-homosexual-indoctrination-like-bashar-al-assad

    Robert Oscar Lopez: Same-sex parenting is slavery:
    http://www.examiner.com/article/robert-oscar-lopez-same-sex-parenting-is-slavery-banned-by-13th-amendment

    Scott Lively, who is releasing a new book to expose Nazi “pinkshirts”:
    http://www.examiner.com/article/scott-lively-announces-new-edition-of-pink-swastika-to-expose-pinkshirts

    And my personal favorite: Phil Elmore, who said liberals and gays were going to murder conservatives, then responded to my column about it with an all-out Twitter tantrum — over sixty tweets, and not a damn one of them about what I actually wrote in the column:
    http://www.examiner.com/article/phil-elmore-libs-and-gays-will-murder-conservatives
    http://www.examiner.com/article/phil-elmore-responds-to-npr-column-with-60-tweets-0-about-the-column

  • Dominick Vila

    The craziest act this week involves the republican woman that threw a show at Hillary Clinton during a speech at the Institute of Recycling. Hillary joked about it and compared to an act appropriate for the Cirque de Soleil. She was too kind. I believe this act is a manifestation of the hatred, lack of class, and the supine ignorance that characterize the behavior of the Republican rank and file. What this idiot does not understand, when she emulated an act considered to be highly disrespectful in the Islamic world, is that she embraced Islamic fundamentalist behavior and by so doing she is no better than the people that attacked us on 9/11. Her behavior is understandable. When people or a party don’t have a record to run on, and when they don’t have the ability to present a logical argument or an opinion, their only recourse is to act like idiots.

    • idamag

      The act certainly reinforces the idea that t-Republicans are not as intelligent as other people.

      • mensa141

        The woman was a democrat party memeber. Get your story straight. You are showing your ignorance!

        • idamag

          I don’t belong to a party so I can be objective. If I am ignorant on the subject of who threw the shoe, then I apologize. It is easy to judge when one party shows up at another party rally, where the President is actually there, with a semi-automatic rifle strapped to his back. Hmmm.

    • Linda S Canter

      To bad she missed….

  • TZToronto

    Clearly, Rick Wiles take the position that homosexuality is a choice. If the super gay male soldiers are actually a “race,” then they would never reproduce since their sexual activity would be, well, fruitless. So what Wiles is suggesting is not so much a race of super gay male soldiers but rather a bunch of guys who somehow become convinced that having sex with women isn’t nearly as attractive an idea as having sex with men. How well does he think that’s going to work?

    • johninPCFL

      The folks that listen to him don’t think that deeply. Strike that. They don’t think.

    • Anne

      What’s really weird is that the man seems to have forgotten that the nazis executed homosexuals. As for Hitler having been homosexual, I guess this moron Wiles mistakes Eva Braun for a guy. At any rate, long before the nazis rounded up jewish people, they incarcerated socialists, communists, homosexuals, and a number of other people they didn’t like. How can anybody be such a moron as not to know this?

      • idamag

        And union members.

        • Anne

          Absolutely, in fact the nazis executed or at least incarcerated the members of the social-democratic party (SPD, which by the way had actually won the 1933 election), the socialists per se, communists, handicapped people, homosexuals, atheists, as well as union members and doctors who had performed abortions while they were still legal in Germany long before they ever got around to Romas, jewish people, et al. In fact, contrary to American propaganda, the first law Hitler enacted when he got into office was to ban abortions. In the end, they incarcerated to execute just about anybody they didn’t particularly like but many of their detainees actually died of more or less natural causes because many were elderly and the conditions in the concentration camps were on the sloppy side. I might also point out that the NSDAP was largely financed by Skull and Bones in the US through the Thule Gesellschaft. Think about that before you get too hyper about America’s moral high ground. The US likes fascists, after all, and always has. What is really comical is that Americans are the only people in the world who were fooled by Hitler’s silly ploy of renaming the defunct DAP (Deutsche Arbeiter Partei) into NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei) simply because socialism was in high vogue in Europe at the time (1919). The term “national” in Europe generally indicates a fascist party (pay attention to the name of the party that came into power per coup in the Ukraine) while the socialists are on the total opposite of the political spectrum. Nationalists indicate with their choice of names that they’re on the extreme right while “Social/ist” indicates that they’re somewhere left of center. Of course there’s no comparison to the US were both major parties are fascist to begin with and the democrats are just a bit on the fascist-lite side while the GOP is just plain fascist with an extremist rightwing faction, the TEAparty which is just a pile of neonazis. Even the former German chancellor Helmut Kohl from the CDU/CSU (right off center) remarked that the democrats in the US are further to the right than his own party. Since the GOP is even further to the right than the democrats, where does that place them?

          —– Original Message —–
          From: Disqus
          To:
          Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:02 AM
          Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

          Settings

          A new comment was posted on The National Memo
          ——————————————————————
          idamag And union members.

          10:02 a.m., Sunday April 13

          Reply to idamag

          idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: What’s really weird is that the man seems to have forgotten that the nazis executed homosexuals. As for Hitler having been homosexual, I guess …
          Read more

          ——————————————————————

          You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
          You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • idamag

            Ah, someone who has studied nazi Germany as extensively as I have.

          • Anne

            Yep, it’s an interesting subject because Germany was such an unlikely candidate for this disaster.
            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:13 PM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            idamag Ah, someone who has studied nazi Germany as extensively as I have.

            10:13 p.m., Sunday April 13

            Reply to idamag

            idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Absolutely, in fact the nazis executed or at least incarcerated the members of the social-democratic party (SPD, which by the way had actually won the …
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • idamag

            I was a child when WWII started. When the newsreels told how many had been killed, they weren’t numbers, they were people. It bothered me a lot. Then the war ended. The newsreels showed what was found in the camps. It was so unbelievably horrifying I wondered how people, in Germany, did this I have spent a lifetime studying the nazis. You are right about it being an unlikely country to fall to a madman. Germany had a democracy that was a example for the world. They never had the level of corruption as we did. They had an education system that was better than ours. They should have been smarter than to go that way. There were some who said hitler was hypnotic and charismatic. Watching old films where he was speaking, he was just plain nuts. He screamed. He ranted. He jumped up and down. He led by playing on people’s emotions. He used hate and fear to a high level. He was an expert in propaganda. Only 1% of the German people joined the resistance. I can see our own people who can be led by emotions. Hitler made the people mistrust their government and government mistrust has been planted here.The government becomes a “they” that is going to ________.

          • Anne

            I knew a lot of people who actually lived in the 3rd Reich. As is turns out, a lot of this film footage about Hitler is hyped by his propaganda machine. If you look closely, the background for him and for his cheering crowd is often not the same, so it’s hard to tell what the people are actually cheering. While Hitler holds the speech in Munich, the crowd seems to stand in front of a building in Cologne, for example. So were these people really cheering him or were they cheering some soccer players or what? Then again, in the US one seems to see the same film footage over and over, so how often did the nazis actually concoct these propaganda films for the newsreels? Who knows? Actually, it seems Eva Braun was a great hostess and Adolf Hitler was a real admirer of technology. He owned a home movie camera back then. A number of his home movies were found and they are quite embarrassing for certain circles. It seems a number of politicians were regular guests at his parties who really wouldn’t want the world to know how comfortable they felt around Hitler. Churchill is one of them.
            As for those films from the death camps, there were only 6 of them. 4 of them were located in Poland. The other two were in Germany, however, the one near Leipzig was out in the boondocks and got ravaged by some disease. Most of the people who died there, died from disease. The first death camp was built in Dachau near Munich but it was more or less a medical research facility, had a military hospital attached to it, and most of the inmates were POWs. Since people died right and left in the concentration camps, the nazis loaded them on trains and parked the trains awaiting the completion of the crematoria in the death camps in Poland. These death camps went into operation during the summer of 1942. The UK has bombed the railroad tracks for years, so it became impossible to transport the bodies to those crematoria to Poland. Of course, the Polish people often killed their jewish neighbors and delivered the bodies to those death camps for disposal. This is a subject Poland demands to remain buried.
            Actually, most German men were in the military by that time. Considering that this took place in the late 30s and early 40s, what does anybody expect the women of Germany to do about those death camps in Poland — provided they even knew about them? Surely nobody expected them to pack up the kids and walk clear into Poland to do what exactly? That so many people went hungry in those camps has a good reason too: Gen. Eisenhower was a firm believer in Gen. Sherman’s slash and burn policies, so with the railroad tracks bombed by the UK and the crops destroyed by the US, where was the food for those camps supposed to come from? As for the German people to keep quiet about a lot of the excesses carried out by the nazis, it’s not clear to me what they were supposed to do about it. Keep in mind that when the US kept Native American Indians in these relocations camps, they were marched across town to their meals. People came out with their kids watching the Indians march by, and what exactly did they do about this except point their fingers and tell the kids “Here come the Indians?” Keep in mind that Indians died in scores in those relocation camps. The world’s most cruel form of slavery took place right under the noses of the American people for centuries, and what did the American people really do about this? In fact, most of them objected to the ending of slavery period and an even larger majority objected to the ending of apartheid (segregation). As the American people walked by trees where black people had been lynched, what exactly did they do about it? And yet, Americans were never subjected to the violent threats the nazis were notorious for.
            Keep in mind that the 3rd Reich only lasted 12 years. More than half of that time Germany spent at war. For the Germans to catch their breath and organize a large resistence within 5 years or so is a bit much to ask considering that the American people sat by and watched the slaughter of the indigenous population and the enslavement of the black people for centuries and didn’t move a finger. Do you realize that even the abolitionists were under no remarkable threat on the part of the US government, yet that group had by far fewer members and sympathizers than the 1% you attribute to the German resistence. In fact, I knew a few members of the VVN (Vereinigung der Verfolgten des Naziregimes = a resistence group) who informed me that the most successful tactics the Nazis had was to question the children in school about what’s being discussed at home. As a result, most Germans didn’t even discuss much at home.

            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:44 AM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            idamag I was a child when WWII started. When the newsreels told how many had been killed, they weren’t numbers, they were people. It bothered me a lot. Then the war ended. The newsreels showed what was found in the camps. It was so unbelievably horrifying I wondered how people, in Germany, did this I have spent a lifetime studying the nazis. You are right about it being an unlikely country to fall to a madman. Germany had a democracy that was a example for the world. They never had the level of corruption as we did. They had an education system that was better than ours. They should have been smarter than to go that way. There were some who said hitler was hypnotic and charismatic. Watching old films where he was speaking, he was just plain nuts. He screamed. He ranted. He j umped up and down. He led by playing on people’s emotions. He used hate and fear to a high level. He was an expert in propaganda. Only 1% of the German people joined the resistance. I can see our own people who can be led by emotions. Hitler made the people mistrust their government and government mistrust has been planted here.The government becomes a “they” that is going to ________.
            9:44 a.m., Monday April 14

            Reply to idamag

            idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Yep, it’s an interesting subject because Germany was such an unlikely candidate for this disaster. —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus<mailto:[email protected]
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • Anne

            Back in the 30s and 40s few people had a car, few people had a phone, and the internet didn’t exist. So this made things a bit difficult. Actually, during the 20s, the Nazis used to strut around in homemade uniforms and made general jerks of themselves. This used to prompt people in Germany to take potshots at them to a point that it got too dangerous to take your kids out. Well, this prompted the German government back then to start some form of gun control. Why American gun nuts claim that Hitler outlawed guns in Germany is a puzzle to me. Those gun laws came into existence long before the nazis came to power, and those laws aren’t even very strict and never were. Europeans just aren’t as fixated on guns as Americans, so the gun laws in Europe seem more effective than they really are.
            I might also point out that Hitler was an admirer of the US and its racist profile. Then again, Eisenhower stated that he had nothing against the Nazis, he just didn’t like the rest of the German people. Churchill pretty much shared Ike’s views. Furthermore, it was Churchill who stated in 1919 that “people shouldn’t be squeamish about gassing inferior races,” and he was at the time referring to the Semitic people (Iraqi to be exact). Considering that Hitler referred to jewish people as Semitic (and so does most of the world), one might keep in mind that just maybe Churchill gave Hitler the idea to gas jewish people. Then again, Hitler at one point held a meeting with other heads of state and suggested that the jewish people are free to emigrate from Germany. The problem was only that nobody offered to give them temporary asylum. In fact, two ships with jewish refugees arrived in the US and were sent back to Germany. The UK was in charge of issuing visas to jewish people who wanted to immigrate in Palestine (under British rule back then), and those visas had fees attached that made it impossible for any family except very rich people to obtain the visas. So who exactly are the UK and the US to sit in judgment over anybody about anything?
            The medical atrocities that took place in Dachau were really along the lines of medical experimentations carried out in the US since the 1920s. Hitler greatly admired Indian reservations in the US. On the whole, Hitler was not exactly an imaginative person, it seems. Considering that he operated with a great deal of brute force, had a huge protection squad around him, and kept switching his travel plans at the last moment, it doesn’t appear that he considered himself a very popular person. Obviously he had reason to be afraid or his protection wouldn’t have been so elaborate. Normally only American politicians travel with so much hired security; especially back then no politician in Europe traveled with as much security personnel as Hitler. Then again, even after Hitler was dead, the US still carried out segregation, lynchings, and starved Indians on reservations. Whatever Hitler did was obviously horrible and inexcusable but apparently not really unusual for his time and even thereafter.
            There were 37 assassination attempts on Hitler as far as anybody knows. There were probably a lot more that never got very far. And all this during a reign that only lasted 12 years to begin with. On the other hand, one of the most brutal presidents in the US was probably Andrew Jackson, and nearly every state has entire cities named in his honor or at least some streets. This suggests that obviously Hitler was merely in the wrong country. Had he been an American president, numerous cities, plazas, streets, and airports would probably be named after him. Then again, keep in mind that Hitler was really not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. The NSDAP was really run by Goebbels and Himmler. Hitler was just pushed to the front because he was better looking, quite fashionable, and very presentable while his pal Goering was a good ol’ boy type. Hitler was expected to impress the women while Goering was expected to be liked by the men. Actually the duo was really better liked outside of Germany than within Germany and actually it was the Austrians who considered him the home-boy who’s done good and not the Germans (keep in mind that Hitler was really Austrian). Even the SS consisted of 50% foreign guys who thought that outfit was simply the sharpest honor guard under the sun. Hitler also had a gift for gab once you overlook the poor sound quality of the recordings that were made at the time. Hitler wasn’t even the author of his own book, Mein Kampf. He had a ghostwriter for that, a cell mate when he was in prison in Bavaria. It’s amazing how Hitler somehow became such an overpowering personality in the American mind while the guy really was just a puppet for Himmler and Goebbels along with a few other ruthless Nazis.

            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:44 AM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            idamag I was a child when WWII started. When the newsreels told how many had been killed, they weren’t numbers, they were people. It bothered me a lot. Then the war ended. The newsreels showed what was found in the camps. It was so unbelievably horrifying I wondered how people, in Germany, did this I have spent a lifetime studying the nazis. You are right about it being an unlikely country to fall to a madman. Germany had a democracy that was a example for the world. They never had the level of corruption as we did. They had an education system that was better than ours. They should have been smarter than to go that way. There were some who said hitler was hypnotic and charismatic. Watching old films where he was speaking, he was just plain nuts. He screamed. He ranted. He j umped up and down. He led by playing on people’s emotions. He used hate and fear to a high level. He was an expert in propaganda. Only 1% of the German people joined the resistance. I can see our own people who can be led by emotions. Hitler made the people mistrust their government and government mistrust has been planted here.The government becomes a “they” that is going to ________.
            9:44 a.m., Monday April 14

            Reply to idamag

            idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Yep, it’s an interesting subject because Germany was such an unlikely candidate for this disaster. —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus<mailto:[email protected]
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • idamag

            Hitler’s racism was loud and clear when Jesse Owens won the race.

          • Anne

            Actually, his racism was loud and clear just like everybody else’s at the time because he never made a secret of it and neither did anybody else. As for this Jesse Owens tale, actually that’s a myth. When Jesse Owens won that gold medal, Hitler wasn’t even in the stadium. After all, he didn’t attend most events of the Olympics. During the closing ceremony, he congratulated all the medalists including Jesse Owens. Jesse Owens himself wondered where that myth came from.

            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 7:45 PM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            idamag Hitler’s racism was loud and clear when Jesse Owens won the race.

            8:45 p.m., Monday April 14

            Reply to idamag

            idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Back in the 30s and 40s few people had a car, few people had a phone, and the internet didn’t exist. So this made …
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • idamag

            I remember the newsreels and there was a stadium. It was not the elaborate stadiums we have today, but I remember the crowds in the bleachers and the shot of Jesse Owens crossing the finish line. We weren’t at war with Germany, at the time, so why would they make the snub up?

          • Anne

            I don’t know when the myth was invented but It’s a myth. Even Jesse Owens himself was wondering where that tale came from. Some of these myths get a life of their own. It’s like the claim that some scientist is claimed to have determined that bumble bees are unable to fly or whatever. Actually, the myth was traced back to some Hollywood movie and was intended to be a joke since obviously the insects fly. There is another myth stemming from a movie which is the claim that lemmings commit mass suicide. They don’t. The lemmings were induced to run toward a cliff and simply climbed down since they’re small animals who can climb quite well. Another often quoted line ostensibly from the movie Casablanca is “play it again Sam” except the line is not even in that movie. You can watch it 20 times and you’ll never hear anybody say “play it again Sam.” That Japan was nuked twice was excused with the claim that it saved the lives of 10,000 US soldiers, which is quite weird, since the war was already over at the time the nukes were dropped. Turns out some reporter just said that off the top of his hat and suddenly everybody parrotted the claim. So, it really doesn’t matter why any myth was invented, fact is that these tales get invented and get a life of their own. Not that it really matters but Hitler simply wasn’t in the audience the day Owens won the medal just like he wasn’t in the audience most of the time during the Berlin Olympics. When Hitler congratulated all the medalists during the closing ceremony, naturally he congratulated Owens as well because the man really wasn’t known for blatantly bad manners since he was in a habit of behaving with these debonaire airs. Of course you saw newsreels of the Olympics in Berlin, nobody is saying the Olympics didn’t take place or Owens didn’t win that particular gold medal. It just so happens that Hitler didn’t snub him. Then again, why would Americans even care? It’s not as if they themselves didn’t snub black people right and left, heck they even lynched black people with impunity. That’s just the way it is. Another famous myth with no basis in fact is that Jane Fonda ostensibly took letters from the US POWs in N Vietnam and gave them to the N Vietnamese authorities. Of course, she didn’t and what would the N Vietnamese government want with those letters anyway? In fact, she took the letters, carried them back to the US with her, and delivered each one of the letters in person to the family of the respective POW. Yet this Fonda letter myth gets repeated over and over and over. Can we assume that some people just enjoy lying?

            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 8:28 AM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            idamag I remember the newsreels and there was a stadium. It was not the elaborate stadiums we have today, but I remember the crowds in the bleachers and the shot of Jesse Owens crossing the finish line. We weren’t at war with Germany, at the time, so why would they make the snub up?
            9:28 a.m., Tuesday April 15

            Reply to idamag

            idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Actually, his racism was loud and clear just like everybody else’s at the time because he never made a secret of it and neither …
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

      • TZToronto

        As far as I can tell, nobody ever gave these people a medal for their extensive study of history. They just say whatever comes into their brain-dead brains. Neither you nor I could make this stuff up. We’re tied to much to reality.

        • Anne

          Really amazing what all these people attribute to Hitler. The guy actually wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, didn’t even write his own book Mein Kampf (he had a ghostwriter when he was in prison in Bavaria), was not the most imaginative guy even in a small room, and basically only got pushed to the front by Himmler, Goebbels, and a few other ruthless Nazis because he was fashion conscious, better looking, quite presentable, and had a gift of gab. Hitler was expected to impress the women while Goering was the good ol’ boy type who was expected to impress the menfolk. Of course, the Germans considered them something akin to Laurel and Hardy but people in other countries actually admired the pair. At any rate, to listen to American versions of the 3rd Reich, Hitler invented abortion although in reality the first law he passed when he got into office was to outlaw abortion on demand. To listen to the NRA, Hitler invented gun control although the reality is that long before the NSDAP elbowed their way to power in 1933, those Nazis used to strutt around like a pile of fools and the Germans took potshots at them which got so dangerous for other pedestrians and their kids, the government started some form of gun control in the 1920s. Since Europeans aren’t as fixated on guns as Americans, all these gun control laws in Europe appear to be by far more effective than they really are. American fundamentalists claim Hitler was an atheist although everybody else knows he was catholic. Americans claim Hitler invented concentration camps although he merely copied American Indian reservations. They also claim he dreamed up the idea of gassing the jewish people although it was Churchill who gave him that idea with the statement that “people shouldn’t be squeamish about gassing inferior races” as W.C. talked about the Semitic people (Iraqi). Hitler traveled with the most extensive security team and changed his travel plans at the last moment, which suggests that he knew he wasn’t a popular guy and obviously was quite afraid, yet to listen to Americans, the man was the most popular guy in Germany. Makes one wonder why during his 12 year reign, there were 37 assassination attempts on him that one knows of, not to mention all those that never got very far, or why his vehicle had bullet proof glass. In those propaganda film clips, the man holds a speech in some town while the background of the cheering crowd shows a different town. What are those people cheering at? Hitler or some soccer team that’s coming by in a parade? Who knows? Half of the SS troops were foreign guys who thought this was the spiffiest honor guard of the century. How a womanizer like Hitler suddenly turned into a homosexual in the American mind is anybody’s guess. I suppose old Adolf is just everything for everybody The only positive thing Hitler ever did was to create the German autobahn system which Eisenhower copied in America with the interstate highway system. again, if he’d been an American president, every state would probably have named a town and an airport in his honor by now considering that they named scores of towns, plazas, and streets after that brutal Andrew Jackson who seems to have been Hitler’s role model. And if Hitler had been an American president, would the American people have objected to any of his brutal actions? Heck, the American people didn’t object to centuries of genocide against Indians or centuries of slavery or a century of apartheid (segregation), and a large number of them would even like to bring apartheid back. Then again, Hitler’s reign of terror only lasted 12 years which is a lot shorter than America tolerated genocide, slavery, apartheid, and constant warfare. What can I say?

          —– Original Message —–
          From: Disqus
          To:
          Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:24 AM
          Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

          Settings

          A new comment was posted on The National Memo
          ——————————————————————
          TZToronto As far as I can tell, nobody ever gave these people a medal for their extensive study of history. They just say whatever comes into their brain-dead brains. Neither you nor I could make this stuff up. We’re tied to much to reality.
          9:24 a.m., Monday April 14

          Reply to TZToronto

          TZToronto’s comment is in reply to Anne: What’s really weird is that the man seems to have forgotten that the nazis executed homosexuals. As for Hitler having been homosexual, I guess …
          Read more

          ——————————————————————

          You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
          You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

          • TZToronto

            Better not say all that at the next Tea Party, er, GOP convention. Heck, even if they agreed with you, they’d condemn you for being un-American. It is amazing, though, how America has sanitized and romanticized its “traditional” treatment of minorities and the native people of North America.

          • Anne

            Yeah really.

            —– Original Message —–
            From: Disqus
            To:
            Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 9:11 PM
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

            Settings

            A new comment was posted on The National Memo
            ——————————————————————
            TZToronto Better not say all that at the next Tea Party, er, GOP convention. Heck, even if they agreed with you, they’d condemn you for being un-American. It is amazing, though, how America has sanitized and romanticized its “traditional” treatment of minorities and the native people of North America.
            10:11 p.m., Monday April 14

            Reply to TZToronto

            TZToronto’s comment is in reply to Anne: Really amazing what all these people attribute to Hitler. The guy actually wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, didn’t even write his …
            Read more

            ——————————————————————

            You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
            You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

    • adp3d

      This is just this guy’s wet dream, he would like to be assaulted by super gay male Nazi soldiers…

      • TZToronto

        Methinks he doth protest too much.

        • idamag

          Methinks, also. I knew a gay-basher personally. He didn’t actually assault gays, but his rhetoric did. I started wondering about his sexuality because of his intensity against gays. After raising four children, his wife divorced him and he moved to Long Beach, California. He kept in touch and when I was doing a job there, he invited me to visit him and his partner. I wasn’t surprised that his partner was a male. I had never seen my friend so happy. He was living who he was. He asked me if I was surprised. I told him I suspected it long ago because his language was sor viral when discussing Gays.

  • John Kruger

    I’m confused, are the super gay male soldiers super soldiers or super gay? All three attributes are super perhaps?

    This guy needs to look up the origin of the pink triangle symbol.

    • idamag

      I am glad you brought that one up. He does need to look that up.

    • http://www.examiner.com/political-rebuttal-in-national/michael-ross Michael Ross

      Oh, he knows. He just doesn’t give a shit. Not when it’s so much more profitable to tell inbred bigots that Nazis were everything BUT white and Christian.

      Scott Lively was spewing forth the exact same shit this week. Hell, he wrote a whole book about how Nazis were gay:
      http://www.examiner.com/article/scott-lively-announces-new-edition-of-pink-swastika-to-expose-pinkshirts

  • Annemb

    Rick Wiles – “… Wiles went on to add that if gay rights aren’t crushed, then Obama’s “super gay male soldiers” will turn America into “a hellacious place to live” where “you’re going to have to go underground to be a Christian.”

    I say, that the worst offenders are those who purport to be “Christian” and continue to act totally the opposite of Jesus.

    • David Kirk

      super Gay male soldiers??? That’s okay…well get’em while they are in the latrine…

      • plc97477

        We can get larry craig to find them with his wide stance.

      • Allan Richardson

        Never mind that the Nazis used their early youth camps for boys and girls (before they started shooting at everybody else in the world) — separate camps, but with “supervised” coed activities — to ENCOURAGE unwed teen pregnancies and label the pregnant girls (a large majority of those who attended the camps) as “heroes” for giving birth to the next generation of “Aryan masters.” What they didn’t say out loud at the time was that they would be needed to replace the young men who would be killed in Hitler’s disastrous war.

        The homosexual recreational sex was only for the TOP Nazi party leaders. All REGULAR people found to be gay were forced to wear a pink triangle, as the Jews were forced to wear the yellow star, so they could be identified when the concentration camps were ready for them. This is the origin of the gay pride movement’s pink or lavender triangles, which preceded the current rainbow flag.

        See either of the two versions of “To Be or Not to Be” (the wartime Jack Benny black and white or the 1970s color Mel Brooks) and notice the stereotypically gay wardrobe man having to flee along with the Jews and Polish partisans (his gay behavior is more obvious in the second version, since Hayes Office censorship limited the range of acting in the first).

        Of course, the UK and US were pretty intolerant then, but not to the point of shipping gay people off to death camps, which these Christianazis apparently want to do. The world did, however, lose at least one mathematical and computer genius, Alan Turing, who helped Britain defeat Germany by teaching a code-breaking group how to crack the Enigma code anew every time the key was changed (and building machines to do it even faster), then killed himself in despair over his chemical castration sentence a decade after the war ended.

        Finally, look at the clothing and hair fashions and building styles of Nazi Germany: a nation that oppresses gays loses a great deal of beauty and creativity. Nothing uglier than Nazi military uniforms.

  • Grannysmovin

    What is more crazy this ship of fools or the Companies that hire them, people who vote for them, people who listen to them and never question what insane things they claim, or the people who actually believe this is what Christianity is.

    • mah101

      Or the media that reports their views as having equal validity in our debates…

  • ps0rjl

    I just have to say how much I enjoy the “Week in Crazy” stories. Like the Sunday comics it makes me laugh. Sadly there are people who believe these idiots.

  • pisces63

    The gay nazi’s would be hilarious but it is true BUT they were the SA under Ernst Rohm who from what i just saw on the history channel was very gay, indeed. They were known to throw orgies and it was noting for someone to walk in on Rohm with someone at any time. Hitler is said to have participated BUT he had all of them murdered, purged on night of the long knives. He allowed Rohm, as his friend, to committ suicide, which he refused. Hitler then, went on a spree of rounding up or killing all homosexuals, closing their clubs, etc. So this man needs to study history. The ‘pink’ were in concentration camps as well as the star of David.

    • idamag

      Homosexuals were required to wear pink triangles on this clothing.

    • mah101

      Does anyone remember the Monty Python marching team skit? Now just replace the British uniforms with SS and imagine…

    • Anne

      The nazis executed homosexuals. Hitler certainly was no homosexual unless one makes a case for Eva Braun havng been a man. In fact, Hitler was quite a womanizer before he hooked up with Eva Braun.
      What is wrong with that moron Wiles? Is he a bit confused upstairs? The Spartan military was heavily homosexual but they were ancient Greeks and not nazis in the 3rd Reich. Really, before people open their pie hole, they should check a few facts. BTW, Hitler was also a good old catholic boy and as such wouldn’t have much use for openly gay people. For goodness sakes, the man had some desires at one time to become a priest.

    • Allan Richardson

      The gay orgies were only allowed for the TOP leaders. Anyone not high (or “high” considering their drug use) enough in the Nazi Party was considered a traitor if suspected of being gay. Not breeding new soldiers, you know.

  • Patricia Robertson

    People don’t care how it seem or look when they do stupid things like this. They are so afraid if Hillary run she will win and chances are she will run. The republicans women who are brainwashed by their husbands are too afraid too come out of the closet and admit they hate their life but the minute their husband is caught cheating with another female or male and leave them, they want the world to feel sorry for them because they don’t even know how to balance a check book. The husband kept them in the dark so much that they don’t even know that they are broke just look at the murders on 48 hrs, snapped and other shows and you can see how cluess those woman are. Or check our lifetime movies they are really down too earth real about people.

  • stcroixcarp

    A quote from my son-in-law: When you are dead you don’t know it but it affects other people. It’s the same when you are stupid!

    • Ford Truck

      GREAT COMMENT!! I want a tee-shirt with that on it!

  • midway54

    DeMint is a thoroughbred, shameless stooge for the plutocrats whose propagandist bastion, among others, is the Heritage Foundation. He left the Senate as fast as he could for what obviously is a better pay scale for him. Moreover, he can fill the air with his buffoonery even more than he could in the Senate chamber. He is another product of South Carolina, where the great majority of its citizens (like those across Dupedom South) must be proud of their ongoing tradition of ignorance as measured by the right wing crazies they dependably send to the House and Senate,

    • Anne

      The Koch brothers finance that crazy Heritage Foundation. That says it all.

    • idamag

      Evident ally, the South is proud of their ignorance. They have “Duck Dynasty.”

      • midway54

        Yes, and, incredibly, the group has a substantial following I have learned.

        • idamag

          That is what is sad.

      • CamCubed

        But it makes lots of money. Therefore it must be moral and correct.

        According to what passes for libertarianism in this country.

  • Ford Truck

    Someone should point out to DeMint that the bible he and his kind love to spout off about EXPECTS US TO KEEP SLAVES. There is NOT A SINGLE COMMENT in the entire bible that condemns slavery!

    The only limit is that you should not beat your slaves hard enough to knock out their eyes or teeth. In Exodus 21:20-21 it says if you beat a slave and they die, you should be punished, UNLESS they die after a couple days, in which case you won’t be punished because they are your property.

    Even Jesus NEVER condemns slavery, and in the New Testament, 1 Timothy 6 it instructs slaves to “serve your masters well,” and serve “believing” masters especially well so the slave can “share in their blessing.” In other words, the bible even expects christians to own slaves.

    It was SECULARISM that did away with slavery, NOT RELIGION!!

    • Anne

      Neither the US constitution itself nor the bible says a word against slavery and it was, in fact, the general American public who protested against the civil rights act and complained about it. If the government hadn’t ended slavery and later apartheid, both would still exist in the US. In fact, ending apartheid in the US (= segregation) was really a move that was mostly prompted by the cold war. After all, Fidel Castro along with the rest of the world couldn’t stop laughing when the US kept blathering about being a democracy and a free country while the police beat the crap out of civil rights demonstrators. The whole world watched white Americans spit on little black kids when the schools in Little Rock and elsewhere got desegregated. After all, at the time television was a novelty and people in Europe watched anything on TV that moved. This included news reports about the US with all these race riots. In fact, all the first presidents and founding crooks etc. except Adams owned slaves which is why the US never was a democracy. Democracies don’t usually engage in genocide and slavery. What a strange concept.

      • idamag

        Actually, when Jefferson presented the first draft of the Constitution, there was method to phase our slavery. Jefferson did own slaves, but he was anti-slavery and believed it should be phased out. That draft did not pass and the slavery issue had to be omitted.

        • Anne

          First of all, any drafts of the constitution are irrelevant except the one that was finally signed into the legal document. Second, no private correspondence between the authors of the constitution and anybody else is part of the legal documant and therefore also irrelevant. And third, Jefferson owned slaves and didn’t liberate them before he signed the constitution (Adams was the only one who had freed his slaves prior to the signing), therefore your opinion on his views are completely misguided. Stop beatifying those genocidal slave-owners into saints and get over that hypocrite Jefferson. For goodness sakes, all the US presidents until the civil war except Adams owned slaves and they all had ample opportunity to free at least their own slaves let alone make slavery illegal period. Even Lincoln’s wife owned slaves which legally made them her husband’s property. Either way, if those founding crooks had been interested in liberty and democracy and everything else they blathered about, they wouldn’t have just “phased out slavery” but would never have engaged in it themselves. Furthermore, they would have simply stopped it instead of suggesting to phase it out and then even reneging on that. Get over your fascination with those crooks. Switzerland had a democracy centuries before those founding guys in the US came along and in fact, most countries around the world never had slaves period let along slaves in the 18th century. Give it a rest. You and your stupid genocidal, slave-owning founding crooks don’t impress anybody. Not only is the US the land of hypocrites, but nothing has ever changed. Even today the US blathers about democracy while this country not only ignores the fact that the voters in Crimea opted to rejoin Russia but even threatens other countries into supporting this fascist government that took hold in the Ukraine by way of coup. In fact, the current hypocrite in chief even stated with a straight face that this election-based annexation of the Crimea by Russia which didn’t involve violence was worse than the American invasion of Iraq where the US military murdered over a million people and destroyed the entire country with radioactive DU munitions. Give me a break, will you? The US really doesn’t have a leg to stand on and never did. Just accept it and deal with facts. The world is already laughing loud enough about this US posturing, you don’t have to defend it clear into the 18th century.

          —– Original Message —–
          From: Disqus
          To:
          Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:11 AM
          Subject: Re: New comment posted on This Week In Crazy: ‘ Super Gay Male Soldiers’ Are Killing Christians, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

          Settings

          A new comment was posted on The National Memo
          ——————————————————————
          idamag Actually, when Jefferson presented the first draft of the Constitution, there was method to phase our slavery. Jefferson did own slaves, but he was anti-slavery and believed it should be phased out. That draft did not pass and the slavery issue had to be omitted.
          10:11 a.m., Sunday April 13

          Reply to idamag

          idamag’s comment is in reply to Anne: Neither the US constitution itself nor the bible says a word against slavery and it was, in fact, the general American public who protested against …
          Read more

          ——————————————————————

          You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43.
          You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to disqus_4IisNEFt43 by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

    • Allan Richardson

      The closest the Bible comes is St. Paul saying that “in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave or free, but all are one in Christ Jesus” — which doesn’t exactly condemn slavery, but at least counts slaves as spiritually equal to their masters; and his personal followup in the epistle to Philemon, a Christian slaveholder, exhorting him to take his runaway slave, who had been baptized by Paul, back and treat him as a “brother in Christ.”

      Actually, the emphasis in New Testament times was to get as many souls PERSONALLY converted as possible, because the end of time was coming any day, and there would not be time to reform any human society, no matter how good their intentions. Of course, there has been PLENTY of time since then, but parts of the Church are still procrastinating showing the love of Christ, or showing His “love” with Satanic methods, like these folks.

  • Budjob

    Jim Demented is as crazy as a fly in a bass drum! What’s really scary is he is one of the sanest ones!

  • idamag

    To help the fringe lunatics get started, on this board: “Truck hits bus load of children.” What about Benghazi?” “Record snow fall for the North East.” “What about Benghazi?” “More victims found in mudslide.” “What about Benghazi?” “Maine seeks to limit prescriptions for narcotic drugs.” “What about George Soros?” “Farm aid program sign ups start Tuesday.” What about George Soros?” “April 15 Deadline for filing Taxes.” “What about George Soros?” Any bets on how long it takes for some dip to say these?

  • Sand_Cat

    As the leading light of a “Think” Tank, maybe Jim should do a little more “thinkin'” before he engages his mouth in the future.

    • midway54

      Why should he start now? Being a scripted stooge pays much better anyhow.

      • Sand_Cat

        How true.

    • CamCubed

      “Conservative think tank” is an oxymoron. I’ve never seen such an organization for washed-out has-been politicians and racists who weasel PHDs out of Ivy League schools like Harvard (thanks largely to mommy and daddy’s connections and the research emphasis of universities that evidently curtails even doctoral review boards’ academic time) until the Cato Institute and Heritage Foundation and AFP (and many, tragically many, many more) came along.

  • Sand_Cat

    Shouldn’t Michele be in the House, where the GOP is doing important work?
    Oh, that’s right: women should be in the house doing housework. Sorry for my confusion.

  • Sand_Cat

    We wouldn’t want a lawyer, or anyone with education and good sense to write our laws if we’re the GOP.

  • mah101

    If people ever have to go underground to be a Christian in this country, it will be because of the stupidity and narrow mindedness of idiots claiming to be Christians when they are anything but.

    • idamag

      Some of those sanctimonious hypocrites are the reason church attendance is falling off.

  • A4ffdn

    It will be such a wonderful point in history when humanity wakes up and realizes that these ignorant and idiotic fairy tale religions based on some old azz books is really bullshiit…just imagine the freedom…

  • S.J. Jolly

    “But a lot of the move to free the slaves came from the people, it did not come from the federal government. It came from a growing movement among the people, particularly people of faith, that this was wrong.” Jim DeMint is technically right, public pressure pushed the Federal government to abolish slavery. Along with the desire to cripple the economic foundation of the Confederacy, of course. Such pressure would have had no effect in the Confederacy without the Union Army pounding the Confederate Army to dust, followed by arresting Sothern leaders. Even then, it took another century, together with a lot of work by Federal law officers, to end de-facto slavery in the former Confederate States.

    • Allan Richardson

      And remember, if public opinion had not been building in the North to abolish slavery, culminating in a victory by the party founded to abolish slavery, and having that in its platform, the Southern states would not have felt the need to make their own separate nation. And if some combination of one or more “border” states had voted for secession, it could have happened.

      • S.J. Jolly

        Slavery was one issue driving secession. Another was tariff policy — the North wanted high tariffs on imported manufactured goods, the South wanted low tariffs. You might say that the primary cause of secession was the breakdown of the ability to make political compromises.

    • http://batman-news.com disqus_QR7ejvoSVU

      Slavery was the result of GREED. People in the US could have performed their own labor, but GREED with the use of free labor made them wealthy — observe “Gone with the Wind”.

      • S.J. Jolly

        Agreed. You get a number of people working hard for you, and you compensate them very little, you can build up some serious wealth.

  • exdemo55

    Talk about crazy:

    One month ago. long-time investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson left CBS amid rumors that she had grown frustrated with the network stifling her investigations. Thursday night on Bill O’ Reilly’s Fox News program she confirmed those rumors. “There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play.”

    After introducing his guest, O’Reilly asked Attkisson about her investigation into the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal.

    The former CBS reporter asserted that she began to make inroads into the story but had to drop it:

    Attkisson: I found out that we had to quit pursuing the story more or less due to lack of interest well before we found answers to a lot of questions. Including what about all the other cases besides the one you know as Fast and Furious that were also using similar strategies to transfer weapons down to Mexico. And how did this, if at all, play into a strategy the United States may be using to draw support or give support towards one of the cartels in Mexico against one of the others much like they had done in Columbia and other places.

    O’Reilly: Playing one off against the other. You said something interesting that you had to abandon the story for lack of interest. Can you clarify that?

    Attkisson: It just came to be that, I don’t think on the viewers’ part, but on the people that decide what stories go into the broadcast and what there is room for, they felt fairly early on that this story was over when I felt as though we had barely begun to scratch the surface. They didn’t ask me what was left to report. They decided on their own the story was done.

    O’ Reilly moved to her investigation into Benghazi.

    Attkisson: Benghazi I was assigned to look into about three weeks after the attacks happened by management, and pursued that aggressively, and as I felt we were beginning to scratch beneath the surface on that scandal as well which I think had many legitimate questions yet to be asked and answered. Interest was largely lost in that story as well on the part of the people that are responsible for deciding what goes on the news.

    O’Reilly: So did they tell you, look, we don’t want you to spend any more time on this? Was it that direct?

    Attkisson: No. It’s more as though there is no time in the broadcast. They really, really liked the story but you start to hear from, you know, other routes that “why don’t you just leave it alone,” “you know, you are kind of a troublemaker because you are still pursuing it.” It kind of goes from hot to cold in one day, sometimes. Where they are asking you to pursue something heavily and then it’s almost as if a light switch goes off and look at you all of the sudden, “Why are you bringing this story?”

    O’Reilly: Is it possible because CBS News is third in the ratings that they are just doing stories that they think are going to get them audiences? Is that possible?

    Attkisson: I suppose there could be differences of opinion as to what the audience wants to see. But I think there are larger things at play in the industry. Broadly there are overarching concerns about, I would say just fear over original investigative reporting. There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well- orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play.

    Attkisson’s last big investigation at CBS was Obamacare:

    Attkisson: I was asked by CBS to look into Obamacare and it had a similar trajectory whereby we broke some interesting stories that I felt we were uncovering some good information and making headway, but we and I feel like a lot of the media after several weeks of this kind of fell off the radar on the story to a large degree on the critical looks that we were taking, security issues, the lack of transparency, the lack of providing figures and information, that I think belonged in the public domain, belonged to us, that were being withheld, while being provided in some cases to corporate partners of the government being withheld from us, though.

    …Just before Christmas came word that the top security official, the computer person who still works there at HHS, had refused to sign off and recommended, in fact, that this web site not go live because of all the security issues. That was not considered a big enough story, I suppose, is the way to put it by those who decide what goes on the air. I thought it was hugely important, because this is an insider, someone who works in the Obama administration who had made this assessment. If you look at having had something like that occur with a private corporation that proceeded to go online with all of these alleged security risks, I think the government would be very upset by that if the tables were turned. Here it was the United States government doing it.

    • midway54

      Yes, and old Bill at Fox “News” really needed a tutorial on the subject of news manipulation and editing for which the crowd over there is so well known and commented about.

      • exdemo55

        Redirecting and distorting with hate and lies, just like Obama

  • dpaano

    Where in hell do Republicans get these people!!!??? What a bunch of dingbats! God help us if they are EVER allowed to run this country….we’d all have to migrate to Canada or run across the border to Mexico!

    • Allan Richardson

      And both countries would want us refugees to show documentation that we were not one of those people before allowing us in!

      Get a copy of “Handmaid’s Tale” (book or movie) and see what the right wing REALLY have planned for America (I mean, “Gilead”).

      • idamag

        I read that book and it haunted me. Another good read is “Fahrenheit 451.” It is a sci fi taking place in the future. Two huge corporations own the world. Except for few pockets, they have destroyed the environment. It is against the law to read or own a book and if a book is discovered in a person’s house, they burn the house down, hence the title. There are huge rewards for turning people in and so it is family against family. They don’t have courts or governments, just corporate boards.

  • Lynda Groom

    This Rick Wiles person needs to get help. Now that health care is available he should take advantage of if and seek out a mental health professional. Fantasy is one thing, but his has moved way beyond ignorance in the land of just STUPID. Do people really follow this nutcase?

  • roberto

    this man should be banned to air all his craziness through any known radio or TV media but and yes I know, he will immediately cover himself with the violation of his constitutional rights in order to continue and be allowed to poison the airwaves

  • Daniel Jones

    Clearly, Quast is trippin’ balls..

  • ayungclas

    Glenn Beck’s statements make no sense. I guess everyone already knew that though.

  • ayungclas

    I’ve got to find a place to use the term: “super gay male soldiers”. That’s too good to pass up. Thanks Rick Wiles for the inspiration!

  • exdemo55

    In 2007, the Frontline documentary “News War” featured a series of interviews with Bill Keller, then the executive editor of Takeaway partner The New York Times. Frontline host Lowell Bergman asked Keller about freedom of the press under the Bush Administration.

    “We have an administration that is more secretive and more hostile to the operations of the press probably than any since the Nixon administration,” Keller replied.

    As Bergman noted in the documentary, many prominent journalists and news organizations agreed with Keller. They may have even looked forward to the Obama years, hoping the new administration would have a change of heart.

    Jill Abramson succeeded Keller as executive editor in July 2011, in the midst of the Obama era. She tells Takeaway host John Hockenberry that the White House’s relationship with the press has only deteriorated.

    “The Obama years are a benchmark for a new level of secrecy and control,” says Abramson. “It’s created quite a challenging atmosphere for The New York Times, and for some of the best reporters in my newsroom who cover national security issues in Washington.”

    Abramson says that the administration’s criminal leak investigations have presented large obstacles to news coverage.

    “There have been seven of them, and one of them right now threatens my colleague James Risen who has been subpoenaed in one of these cases,” she says. “Collectively, they have really, I think, put a chill on reporting about national security issues in Washington.”

    Those that are covering national security, according to Abramson, say that is has never been more difficult to get information.

    “Sources who want to come forward with important stories that they feel the public needs to know are just scared to death that they’re going to be prosecuted,” she says. “Reporters fear that they will find themselves subpoenaed in this atmosphere.”

    Abramson says that the Obama Administration uses legal loopholes to make things difficult for journalists and media organizations. She says, for example, that the Obama Justice Department pursues cases against reporters under an obscure provision of the 1917 Espionage Act.

    “I think, in a back door way using an obscure provision of an old law, they are tip-toeing close to things that, here in the United States, we’ve never had,” says Abramson.

    In addition to shutting out reporters, Abramson says that photographers also have less access.

    “Instead, [there's] a preference to have journalists rely on photography handouts from the White House,” she says. “I’m not knocking the White House photographers—they’re great—but you don’t want one source for all information and all imagery about the president.”

    While Abramson says that the White House hasn’t completely shut out the U.S. press corps, even routine media coverage has become difficult to obtain.

    “The amount of friction and confrontation involved in just going about what I see as perfectly normal coverage, that in the past wouldn’t have even provoked a discussion, becomes a protracted and somewhat exhausting process,” she says.

  • Jay

    This week in crazy What happen to the biggest morons Louie Gohmert and Steve Stockman they should always make the top 5. every time they open there mouths its always unbelievable . Whats more amazing that people actually voted for these morons

  • http://batman-news.com disqus_QR7ejvoSVU

    Why does the guy in the low T ad on TV look like Jim Demint?

  • teresa

    so what are the super gay females doing…lol. I was in the military in the early 80s and never had problems with the gays of male or female. If someone wants to serve their country, that’s good…its the bigot racists homophobic’s that caused the problems in the team work of the military

  • holoh

    FUCK HOMOS. Call me at
    (212)685-3199 to discuss your views that being a fucking fag is okay.

  • Elliot J. Stamler

    I wish those super gay super soldiers would get on with it and start massacring all these right-wing fascist “patriots.” What’s taking them so long? Why is their Moslem Communist Kenyan commander-in-chief not releasing them ?

scroll to top