Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, January 18, 2019

Wisconsin: Conservatives Win, Liberals Gain

WASHINGTON — There will be no magic potion, no instant formula for Democrats and progressives struggling to come back from their disastrous 2010 election losses.

They had hoped that Tuesday’s recall elections in Wisconsin would provide a narrative-changing breakthrough, proof-positive that the overreaching conservatives who now dominate the Republican Party had ignited a middle-of-the-road voter rebellion and inspired a legion of labor and liberal activists who would offer a definitive riposte to the tea party.

What happened instead was not without promise for Democrats, but it was also a sign of the resiliency of conservative activism — and the power of conservative money.

By holding on to four of its six contested state Senate seats, Gov. Scott Walker’s party maintained its majority and a right to claim victory. But that majority is a now precarious one-seat advantage. While Republicans hope they might pick up another seat next week by winning at least one of two recalls directed against Democratic incumbents, Walker seemed to signal he understood that his was not an unalloyed triumph.

The often pugnacious governor was remarkably mild in a statement he issued after the results were in. “I believe we can work together to grow jobs and improve our state,” he said. “In the days ahead I look forward to working with legislators of all parties to grow jobs for Wisconsin and move our state forward.” One Democrat called it the “most conciliatory statement he has ever made.” In the meantime, Democrats were touting the potential of their working with Republican state Sen. Dale Schultz, a moderate who has frequently resisted Walker’s arch-conservatism.

Still, this was small comfort compared to what might have been. If only about 1,100 votes had switched in the closest contest, Democrats would have won the extra Senate seat they needed and would now be celebrating their use of Walker’s frontal attack on the collective bargaining rights of public employees to produce a political realignment.

Republicans had shrewdly found ways of delaying the balloting. This allowed some of the white-hot anger of the winter’s labor battles to dissipate — even if the unions put everything they had into intense organizing.

You could tell even before the polls closed that Democrats feared they would fall short. “I just wish these elections had been held a week ago,” said a Wisconsin-based Democratic consultant as reports of high turnout made their way around the state. He argued that the anti-Walker message was muddled by a week of economic turmoil spawned by the debt-ceiling fight and a plummeting stock market. The dominant news was national and international, about President Obama and Congress, not about Wisconsin, Walker and his state Senate allies.

These contests will be studied as a laboratory test of wide-open campaign finance laws that allowed outside groups to pour millions of dollars into the state. Conservatives succeeded in using their large financial advantage to blunt the impact of labor and progressive organizing. All the spending had the effect of transforming the recalls from a progressive crusade into a typical and dispiriting electoral trench war and its weapons of choice, negative media ads and nasty mailings.

In truth, the euphoria created by the initial anti-Walker upsurge disguised the fact that the recalls were always destined to be difficult. “This was an extraordinarily hard set of races to win,” said Mark Mellman, a pollster who worked with the Wisconsin Democrats. “All these were incumbents who won in 2008 when Barack Obama was sweeping the state. Yet the Republicans lost one-third of their incumbents,” referring to the two senators recalled. “I’d be delighted if the Republicans lost one-third of their incumbents in 2012.”

Mellman, of course, was putting the best spin on the results for the Democrats. But it’s true that these were fights waged in Republican territory. As Craig Gilbert of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel pointed out in a helpful analysis, while all six districts were swing areas that had voted for both Walker and Obama, five of the six were more Republican than the state as a whole in 2008 and again in 2010. (And Democrats carried the other district handily.)

Republicans can say, and it’s true, that a very conservative governor carried out a very conservative agenda and escaped defeat. But he did not escape rebuke, and progressives can legitimately claim that having watched conservatives take fight after fight to their adversaries, a labor-liberal coalition reversed these roles in Wisconsin. Conservatives withstood this assault. Progressives made modest but measurable advances.

E.J. Dionne’s email address is ejdionne(at)

(c) 2011, Washington Post Writers Group

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 0

5 responses to “Wisconsin: Conservatives Win, Liberals Gain”

  1. Dik says:

    Mr. Dionne;

    When did ‘collective bargaining’ become a right rather than a politically enacted rule? Where is this right enumerated and who granted it?

    Dik Thurston
    Colorado Springs

  2. historyfan says:

    When did we lose our rights to organize for better working conditions and pay. If something is not forbidden, it’s our right.
    Where did the corporations get the “right” to organize and fund huge think tanks and conservative groups (who go by patriotic sounding names) whose aim is to change our elections? Know about ALEC? I recommend you look it up. How about American Enterprise? Accuracy in Media? American Immigration Control committee? Cato Institute? There are hundreds more, funded by people like the Koch brothers and big corporations.

  3. Edward says:

    @ Dik,

    The UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes Collective bargaining as a basic right, which was adopted nearly 64 years ago.

    Article 23. #(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

    Full text:

  4. lesliepoi says:

    You made some respectable factors there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will go together with with your website.
    Vardenafil interneural

  5. Chetty1 says:

    Those winey liberals are at it again… “If only… this and that… all the money… blah blah blah”…. Face it, people are fed up with the winey politcally correct, perverse, weird anything goes liberals. And although I am a union member myself, I’m not so dumb and greedy to see the UNIONS and more so the ILLEGALS are draining our cities and wrecking our country!!! OH OH, I said the “I” word!!! I guess I should have said “Foreign Guests”, “Undocumented visitors”, Foreigner’s who lost their way and wound up in the USA by accident etc. etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.