Reprinted with permission from Alternet
Trump's MAGA supporters were out in full force Friday afternoon, chanting "F**k Biden," waving flags with the same slogan, along with ones that falsely claim "Trump won," as President Joe Biden spoke with young children outside a Connecticut child development center.
"Around 50 more Trump supporters," according to the White House press pool, "gathered a street away from the center. They chanted 'F*** Joe Biden. He's not our president.' They also shouted 'traitors' as a coda while we walked inside."
Minutes later the press pool reported President Biden "entered the playground at 1:25, greeted by some gregarious children. One gave him a hug, as he kneeled to talk. Another, wearing an American flag t-shirt, pointed out parts of the playground."
But then, confirmation that the Trump supporters' profanity could be heard by the young children and the President.
"From the playground the pool could still hear protesters chanting from the curb outside. More expletives. More yelling," the pool reports.
NBC News White House Correspondent Mike Memoli also confirms:
President Biden later made televised remarks promoting his "Build Back Better" agenda, and talking about how improvements to infrastructure will help young children.
- Black 'American' Flags Hoisted By Far Right Signal 'No Quarter' For ... ›
- Trumpist Lawyer Lin Wood Accused Of Violent, Delusional Behavior ... ›
- New Study Reveals Startling Economic Profile Of Capitol Rioters ... ›
- Trump's Election Lies Will Spur More Extremist Terror, Intelligence ... ›
- The Republicans have become the party of violence | Column ›
- Opinion | The threat of violence now infuses GOP politics. We should ... ›
- Trump's history of inciting violence in words and tweets: A timeline ... ›
- Political Violence May Be Necessary, 4 In 10 Republicans Say : NPR ›
- 'No Blame?' ABC News finds 54 cases invoking 'Trump' in ... ›
Start your day with National Memo Newsletter
The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning
Reprinted with permission from DailyKos
On Friday, U.S. Capitol Police officer Michael A. Riley was arrested and indicted on obstruction of justice charges connected to the January 6 insurrection. The Associated Press reports that the 50-year-old Riley is accused of "tipping off someone who participated in the riot by telling them to remove posts from Facebook that had showed the person inside the Capitol."
U.S. Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger told the AP in a statement that the department became aware of the investigation into Riley, a veteran officer with 25 years of experience, a few weeks ago. His arrest and indictment have led to Riley being put on administrative leave. Manger also says that his department will be opening its own investigation into Riley's behavior surrounding the events of January 6, 2021.
In the indictment, filed on Thursday, Riley was on active duty in the K-9 unit, and while he was not in the Capitol building on Jan. 6, he did respond to reports of an explosive device near the Capitol grounds. The obstruction comes after a new Facebook friendship Riley had begun with someone—identified as "Person 1"—posted "'selfie'-style photographs, videos, and other commentary on Facebook admitting his presence and conduct inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021."
According to court documents, Riley became friends with Person 1 on January 1, though the two individuals "did not know each other." It seems they were both connected through "fishing-related Facebook groups." Anyhow, On January 7, Riley reached out in a direct message to Person 1, writing, "Hey [Person I], im [sic] a capitol police officer who agrees with your political stance. Take down the part about being in the building they are currently investigating and everyone who was in the building is going to charged. Just looking out!"
Sounds like one of these good cops we always hear about. The indictment details a series of messages between the new Facebook buddies. After receiving a few more videos, apparently shot during the insurrection, officer Riley calls the day's events a "shit show" and acknowledges that "[w]e had over 50 officers hurt, some pretty bad."
Person 1 does plead his innocence, to which Riley gives his expert legal advice: "The only thing I can see is if you went in the building and they have proof you will be charged. You could always articulate that you had nowhere to go, but thats for court."
Now, let's pay attention to dates and exchanges. The officer and the insurrectionist continue to talk about fishing and the Jan. 6, Capitol event. Then on January 9, 2021:
Person 2 messaged RILEY about Person 1. In particular, Person 2 sent RILEY a video of Person 1's Facebook live-stream from the U.S. Capitol on January 6, which showed Person 1 smoking an unknown substance inside the Capitol building. Person 2 also sent RILEY a screenshot of the video, capturing Person 1 inhaling from a hand-rolled cigarette. RILEY responded to Person 2, in part, "Yep I know..."
Hold onto that story in your memory banks about January 9, 2021. By Jan. 12, Riley and his new buddy were communicating "extensively through Facebook direct messages about their shared interest in fishing." If you love fishing, you really love fishing, amiright? Then, Person 1 begins stressing out about "being discussed on social media" because of their conduct on January 6. Riley tells Person 1 to get off social media.
On January 16, Person 1 sends Riley a link via direct message to a news story about Person 1 being arrested. Person 1 says the story is "fake news." Riley responds that he knows a lot of people are being arrested in connection to the events of January 6, and he tells Person 1 to call him, then provides his cell phone number. The two then have a 23-minute conversation.
Within hours of this conversation, Person 1 sent text messages to two other individuals indicating that he had spoken to "capitol police" and the charges against him were likely to involve only trespassing.
(Don't forget about that video Riley acknowledged seeing back on January 9!)
The two exchange Facebook messages about the charges Person 1 faces. Riley is very generous, telling Person 1: "Next time you want to come to DC just call me, you can stay at my house on the shore for free and bring your daughter to the museums. If you want to see the capitol building, lets do it legally next time...I know a guy who can get you a tour...lol. Its behind you now...lesson learned! Just ask your attorney whats next."
Person 1 is arrested on January19 and interviewed by the FBI.
[cue ominous music]
On January 20, Person 1 and Riley—still communicating like best new buds—have an exchange wherein Person 1 details his experience of interviewing with the FBI. Person 1 says, "The fbi was very curious that I had been speaking to you if they havent already asked you about me they are gonna. They took my phone and downloaded everything."
Riley says, "thats fine." Then, the same day, officer Michael Angelo Riley deletes all of his Facebook direct messages with Person 1. Weird.
On January 21, 2021, Riley sent this direct Facebook message to Person 1:
Hey [Person 1], another mutual friend was talking about you last night. I tried to defend you but then he showed me a video of you in the Capitol smoking weed and acting like a moron. I have to say, i was shocked and dumbfounded, since your story of getting pushed in the building with no other choice now seems not only false but is a complete lie. I feel like a moron for believing you... I was so mad last night I deleted all your post, but i wanted to text you this morning and let you know that I will no longer be conversing with you.
Huh. Back on January 9, Riley was pretty relaxed about this exact video. Is that offer for free lodging and a tour still open?
Reporter Zoe Tillman of BuzzfeedNews reports that, while Riley's case is pending, he will be allowed to go home under specific conditions: He must check in weekly; he must possess no firearms, or have any firearms in the home; he must notify the court if he plans to travel and cannot travel internationally without court approval; and the government will specify certain people he cannot have contact with during this time.
Republicans have been attacking President Joe Biden's jobs package for months, claiming its provisions would destroy the middle class and stop pharmaceutical research. A new poll shows broad support for both the overall plan and for the parts they have railed against.
According to a Navigator Research survey, released October 15, when told the basics of the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better package and how it would be funded, three-fifths of registered voters back the bill. These numbers were similar to last month's data from the firm.
Congressional Republicans unanimously oppose the plan, which would invest billions in child care, health care, free community college and pre-school, paid leave, clean energy, and climate change infrastructure and be funded by collecting more revenue from corporations and from people making $400,000 or more.
They have been especially vocal in their opposition to the tax increases — which they falsely claim would mostly be paid by lower- and middle-class Americans and would "cripple" the middle class. In reality, Congress' non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimates federal taxes would be cut for American families in every income category earning under $200,000 a year.
The GOP has also fought to remove provisions aimed at saving Medicare money and lowering drug costs for Americans and businesses by allowing the government to purchase common medications in bulk and to negotiate better prices with pharmaceutical manufactures.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell denounced the idea as "Socialist price controls" and warned that reduced industry profits will mean "fewer new drugs and cures." A Congressional Budget Office estimate in December 2019 predicted drug price legislation would result in just "approximately 8 fewer drugs" in total created over the next decade and "about 30 fewer drugs over the subsequent decade."
When those surveyed were asked about whether specific provisions in the package were a "good reason to pass the plan," two of the most popular items were "giving Medicare the power to negotiate for lower drug prices" (backed 80 percent -20 percent) and "raising taxes on the rich and corporations to make sure they pay their fair share" (supported 75 percent -25 percent).
They also indicated strong support for adding dental, vision, and hearing coverage to Medicare (82 percent -18 percent), lowering health insurance premiums for people who buy their own insurance (84 percent-16 percent), making child care more affordable (77 percent -23 percent), creating clean energy jobs (72 percent-29 percent), and guaranteeing universal paid family and medical leave (70 percent-30 percent).
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.