The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Lisa Mascaro, Tribune Washington Bureau (TNS)

WASHINGTON — This week offers a make-or-break moment for Republican leaders on Capitol Hill.

After stumbling several times since taking control of Congress earlier this year, House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., have an opportunity to demonstrate on two important fronts that Republicans can effectively govern.

But it remains unclear if they will be able to deliver.

Boehner acknowledged Tuesday the momentous days ahead, as Republicans will try to pass their annual budget for fiscal 2016 and approve a sweeping bipartisan accord to overhaul the way doctors are paid under Medicare.

“Well, this is a big week for the House’s focus on the people’s priorities,” Boehner said.

Unable to unite feuding Republicans around a single budget blueprint, GOP leaders in the House are resorting to a rarely used procedure — dubbed “Queen of the Hill” — that allows lawmakers to vote on whichever plan they prefer. The one with the most votes advances.

It was seen as the only way to resolve a standoff between the party’s defense hawks and deficit sharks that has threatened to derail the entire process.

Defense backers want to boost Pentagon spending and counter the austerity cuts demanded by deficit watchers in a 2011 deal. GOP deficit watchers, meanwhile, are trying to hold the line against new government spending.

Debate began Tuesday, but with lawmakers scheduled to break early for a fundraising dinner with former Vice President Dick Cheney, votes were not expected until Wednesday.

The first plan, approved by the House Budget Committee under Chairman Tom Price, R-Ga., imposes steep cuts on social services while boosting military money. But to avoid increasing the deficit, it makes the military increases contingent on spending cuts in other areas, which would be determined in the future.

The second plan, also offered by Price, includes an even larger Pentagon increase and abandons the contingency requirement, thereby raising the deficit. Defense hawks favor this approach because they fear that under the first plan, the Pentagon will never see the extra money because it will be too difficult to agree on the mandatory cuts.

Boehner made it clear he thinks the defense hawks will win the day by approving the second plan. He called the exercise “the most democratic — small D — way” to resolve the issue.

“The budget alternative that gets the most votes is the one that goes on to final passage, and I think that’s a great way to do it,” Boehner said, noting that the House routinely votes on other budget proposals by various caucus groups, including progressives and conservatives.

The Senate, meanwhile, has begun debates and votes on its plan.

Republicans in the Senate initially declined to explicitly increase defense funds, but then revised their plan to be more in line with the House GOP. The Senate version similarly boosts military money, but promises to offset the increases with unspecified defense reductions in the future.

McConnell acknowledged that budgets often require compromise, and “this one is certainly that.”

Both chambers hope to approve their budgets by the end of the week. If the remaining differences between the House and Senate can be reconciled, passage would mark a milestone for Congress, which has been unable agree on budgets in recent years.

That would go a long way in supporting the GOP’s promise to run Congress more efficiently and effectively than during the time Democrats controlled the Senate and Republicans held the House.

Less certain is the outlook for the ambitious proposal to fix a long-standing dispute over payments to doctors under Medicare.

Boehner and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have spent weeks negotiating the intricate deal that would prevent doctors from facing a substantial pay cut set to take effect by March 31.

The so-called doc-fix deal is just the kind of bipartisan compromise both sides say they want, but rarely find. Passage would be a unique achievement for a Congress that in recent years has usually only provided stopgap fixes that prolong tough decisions.

And that is what is making the outcome so uncertain.

The accord would replace the doctors’ reimbursement rate with a new formula, ending years of uncertainty and reining in costs.

In exchange for their support, Democrats negotiated a two-year extension of a popular children’s health care program, which is expiring at the end of the fiscal year.

Part of the costs of the compromise would be offset by asking the wealthiest 2 percent of seniors to pay more for their Medicare insurance premiums.

But some Democrats still oppose asking seniors to pay more for Medicare. The premium hikes would hit Medicare beneficiaries with adjusted gross incomes above $133,500 a year, or $267,000 for married couples.

And some Republicans are hesitant to agree to a deal that is not fully paid for with spending reductions elsewhere.

Senate Democrats have been particularly cool to the deal, believing Pelosi could have struck a better one.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., indicated Tuesday he was in no rush to approve the package.

Some Democrats are pushing for a four-year extension of the children’s health care program. Senate Democrats are also fuming over language inserted into the bill that would restrict any of the taxpayer payments to the doctors to be used for abortion services, except in limited cases of rape, incest or a threat to the life of the mother.

Those abortion restrictions have been approved by Congress as part of the appropriations process every year for more than 30 years under the Hyde Amendment. But Democrats say Republicans, seeking to quietly expand abortion restrictions, have been increasingly attaching the same language to other measures, including an anti-human-trafficking bill that has stalled over the provision.

Democrats suggested Tuesday they may be able to postpone a decision, because billing procedures for Medicare doctors means cuts wouldn’t fully begin until mid-April.

With Congress set to take a two-week recess Friday for the Easter and Passover holidays, Republicans could emerge having accomplished two big tasks.

That would notch a win for the new leadership that has struggled to keep its majority in line for the first few months of the year.

(c)2015 Tribune Co., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Photo: Peter Stevens via Flickr


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}