The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Apparently inspired by Virginia’s ill-fated attempt to force women to undergo an invasive ultrasound before undergoing an abortion, Alabama lawmakers have been working hard to move a similar ultrasound bill through their State Senate.

The Alabama bill — which would require women seeking an abortion to first submit to either a trans-vaginal or trans-abdominal ultrasound, would give the woman no choice of which procedure would be performed, and has been labeled by one state senator as “state-sanctioned rape” — was moved through the Alabama Senate Health Committee last week by Republican chairman Greg Reed.

In a not-so-shocking coincidence, Reed would personally profit from the bill’s passage. He currently serves as vice president of Preferred Medical Systems, a company which sells ultrasound equipment and would theoretically benefit from a law requiring clinics across Alabama to perform government mandated ultrasounds.

Reed says that there is no conflict of interest, claiming that “I do not sell ultrasound equipment in my business to clinics that are abortion clinics.” As political blog Left In Alabama points out, however, Reed’s defense doesn’t stand up to scrutiny:

Of course SB12 will increase the demand for equipment Reed’s company sells. This bill would require a medically unnecessary (and usually invasive transvaginal) ultrasound before procedures performed in hospitals or outpatient centers, not just abortion clinics. A woman with an ectopic pregnancy or fetal death is going to end up in a hospital — and that hospital will require more of the kind of machines Sen. Reed’s company profits off of.

Just like Rick Scott’s mandatory drug tests or Michael Chertoff’s lobbying for full-body scanners, Greg Reed’s attempt to push invasive ultrasounds serves as a reminder: when you see a stupid piece of policy, you can usually find the motivation behind it by following the money.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, left, and former President Donald Trump.

Photo by Kevin McCarthy (Public domain)

In the professional stratum of politics, few verities are treated with more reverence than the outcome of next year's midterm, when the Republican Party is deemed certain to recapture majorities in the House and Senate. With weary wisdom, any pol or pundit will cite the long string of elections that buttress this prediction.

Political history also tells us that many factors can influence an electoral result, including a national crisis or a change in economic conditions — in other words, things can change and even midterm elections are not entirely foretold. There have been a few exceptions to this rule, too.

Keep reading... Show less
x

Close