Type to search

Army General Sinclair Breaks Down, Asks Judge To Not Punish Family

McClatchy Tribune News Service National News

Army General Sinclair Breaks Down, Asks Judge To Not Punish Family


By David Zucchino, Los Angeles Times

FORT BRAGG, NC — Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair broke down in tears Wednesday at his sentencing hearing, asking the judge to allow him to retire at a reduced rank instead of dismissing him from the Army, which would deprive him of military benefits and “punish” his family for his adulterous affair with a captain.

“I have squandered a fortune of life’s blessings, blessings of family, work and friendship,” the one-star general said in court. “I have put myself and (the) Army in this position with my selfish, self-destructive and hurtful acts.”

He said he “failed as a leader” and apologized to his accuser and the two officers he pressured to send him nude photos of themselves.

The judge, Col. James S. Pohl, is expected to sentence Sinclair on Wednesday for mistreating an Army captain with whom he conducted a three-year adulterous affair in Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany and the United States.

Speaking for the prosecution, Lt. Col. David Leach, who served under Sinclair in 2012 in Afghanistan, said the general’s actions were “not a minor mistake. It was a matter of internal moral and ethical direction and that was most disturbing. … He failed his family, soldiers he served and the American people.”

Sinclair, who has remained composed during most of his court-martial the last two weeks, bent forward, his hands clasped, as attorney Ellen Brotman read a statement to the judge from Rebecca Sinclair. The general wiped his eyes with a tissue when the statement mentioned the impact of Sinclair’s adultery and prosecution on the couple’s sons, ages 10 and 12.

“My boys and I are the only truly innocent victims to these offenses,” Rebecca Sinclair’s statement read. She referred to charges against her husband that have been “so publicly and horribly aired.”

Sinclair, 51, one of only a handful of generals to face court-martial in the last 60 years, pleaded guilty Monday to mistreating the captain. He also pleaded guilty to twice misusing his government charge card to pursue the affair, disobeying an order not to contact his mistress, and making derogatory comments about other female officers.

A week earlier, Sinclair pleaded guilty to adultery; impeding an investigation by deleting sexually explicit emails to and from a civilian woman; possessing pornography in a war zone; conducting inappropriate relationships with two other female officers; and improperly asking a female lieutenant for a date.

The 27-year veteran of five combat tours technically faces up to 25 1/2 years in prison. However, an agreement between prosecutors and the defense puts a cap on any punishment; the actual sentence will be the lower of the two — the cap or the judge’s sentence.

Terms of the cap agreement, known as a “quantum,” were not disclosed. Pohl has not seen the document, but will read it after he sentences Sinclair. The judge will then reconcile any differences between his sentence and the quantum.

If convicted on the original charges of sexual assault, sodomy and making death threats, Sinclair would have faced life in prison and registration as a sex offender. With those charges dismissed, his sentence is expected to be far less severe.

Sinclair’s lawyers have asked for no prison time, and for Sinclair to be allowed to retire at a reduced rank of lieutenant colonel — the highest rank at which he was not accused of misconduct.

It was not clear Wednesday whether, if Sinclair is sentenced to prison time, he would be placed in custody immediately or given time to put his affairs in order. That decision would be made by Army officials, not by the judge, according to military legal officers.

AFP Photo/Paul J. Richards



  1. disqus_ivSI3ByGmh March 20, 2014

    Too damn bad. You insulted the uniform when you carried on these actions. Let your wife (or ex-wife as she soon may become) sue your butt off for her loss of benefits and privileges you squandered away by your actions.

    1. Ford Truck March 20, 2014

      A bit naive on your part. If his retirement is taken from him, where would he get the money to pay her whatever she wins? What should be done is she should be awarded his retirement, with him getting none of it. After all she served as a faithful Army wife all these years. She deserves something for her years of his military service.

      1. disqus_ivSI3ByGmh March 20, 2014

        If he worked for any private company with a Zero Tolerance policy, he would be fired for cause with total loss of all benefits, too. His wife would be in the same position. This SoB insulted the uniform that those of us who served honorably proudly wore. I classify him the same as those who flip the bird in their “selfies” while in uniform as someone who does not deserve the honor of that uniform. Sorry, Ford, if you think me naive, but let this guy get a job with a private security force (or mercenary force, if you prefer to call them what they really are) that doesn’t have as high of a set of standards for moral behavior, so he can afford to pay her what she thinks she deserves. By the way, back when I was in, my wife had her own job with pay and benefits, so she didn’t necessarily need her military benefits. Do I feel sorry for her at her potential loss of pension? Not really. If she had been paying attention to what her husband was doing behind her back all that time, she may have been able to put a stop to this. Maybe she was just too self-impressed with being a “General’s wife” to worry about reality!

        1. Ford Truck March 20, 2014

          I served honorably 6 years (’67-’72) in the Marines, with a tour in ‘Nam (2 bronze stars and a purple heart) and I still feel the way I do. You say “if she had been paying attention to what her husband was doing..” a bit hard for her to do from 12,000 miles away!!

          1. Mikey7a March 20, 2014

            Semper Fi Marine!

          2. Ford Truck March 21, 2014


        2. Mikey7a March 20, 2014

          Wow, so it’s the spouses fault that her husband is a dishonorable, untrustworthy, piece of garbage? I agree with Ford, give the pension to the wife and kids, and lock his cheating ass up!


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.