The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

[vc_row][vc_column]

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Attorney General William Barr’s four-page summary of the 300+-page report by special counsel Robert Mueller on Russian election interference is clearly not going to satisfy anyone. The summary — stating that Mueller did not “establish” conspiracy between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government, and that he neither confirmed nor exonerated the president on obstruction of justice, demands greater detail. A new poll shows 75 percent of the public want the full report released.

Unfortunately, Trump’s Justice Department is unlikely to make the full report available voluntarily — not even to Congress.

Barr has told House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) that he has no plans to release the report immediately, and that he will still be redacting large portions of it, including grand jury proceedings.

While this is allowed under special counsel regulations, and is in fact typical DOJ policy in most cases to protect the reputation of people who are not being charged with crimes, this is not an ordinary case — and the DOJ has historically been far more transparent about cases involving national political controversy.

For this reason, Natasha Bertrand writes in The Atlantic, House Democrats are planning to go much further and demand the report with no redactions — setting up a clash with the DOJ, and possibly a court fight:

The House Democrats’ position now is that “there is nothing stopping Barr from giving us the grand-jury material” that informed Mueller’s findings, according to another Democratic staffer who spoke with reporters on Thursday on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. “If he doesn’t, then that amounts to a cover-up.” Another Democratic staffer said that, in a call with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler on Wednesday night, Barr “would not commit to releasing the full report” — including grand-jury material — to the House. A spokesman for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy did not return a request for comment about the House Republicans’ position on seeing the full report. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally, indicated on Wednesday that he will accept whatever redactions Barr makes, including of grand-jury material.

[/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column]

Between the withholding of grand-jury and privileged material and the redaction of classified information, the public could be left with a shell of the original report.

[/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column]

Democrats have specifically demanded that Barr transmit the full report by April 2 — a deadline that now appears all but assured he will not meet.

Former Solicitor General Neal Katyal, who wrote the special counsel law, has argued that Democrats would likely win a subpoena fight — but that the administration would assert executive privilege over some portions of the report, and that courts may urge Congress and the DOJ to negotiate rather than rule for one of them.

Whatever happens over the next few days, it is clear that the battle to reveal what Mueller found is just getting started.

[/vc_column][/vc_row]

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Former President Bill Clinton leaves UCI Medical Center with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

CNBC screen shot

(Reuters) - Former U.S. President Bill Clinton walked out of a Southern California hospital early Sunday morning accompanied by his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, after being admitted last week for a urological infection, live video showed.

Clinton, 75, had been in California for an event for the Clinton Foundation and was treated at the University of California Irvine Medical Center's intensive care unit after suffering from fatigue and being admitted on Tuesday.

Keep reading... Show less

Trumpist rioters rampaging in the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021

Reprinted with permission from DailyKos

The federal judge overseeing the Oath Keepers conspiracy case in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection ordered their trial delayed this week, primarily because of the overwhelming amount of evidence still being produced in their cases. Though the delay was expected, its reasons are stark reminders that January 6 will be one of the most complex prosecutions in history and that the investigation remains very active as more evidence piles up. There are likely some very big shoes still to drop.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}