fbpx ');*/ /*jQuery("#postgridID").addClass("second"); jQuery("#content-wrapper #page-wrapper .tt-content .vc_row .tt-slider-content #postgridID").before(''); */ });

Type to search

Black Lives Matter Protest Ends Quickly At Mall Of America

Headlines National News Reuters

Black Lives Matter Protest Ends Quickly At Mall Of America

Share

By David Bailey

BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (Reuters) – A demonstration at the Mall of America on Wednesday by Black Lives Matter protesters angered by the police killing of an unarmed black man in Minneapolis last month was swiftly broken up on one of the busiest shopping days of the year.

After police and mall security dispersed the gathering, the protesters took a light rail train to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport where they briefly shut down roadways to both terminals, an airport spokesman said.

Inside Terminal 2, security checkpoints were briefly shut down to prevent protesters from moving into secure areas of the airport, the second busiest in the Midwest after Chicago’s O’Hare.

Earlier, about 100 people had started to gather at the mall, one of the largest in North America, despite a judge’s warning that the property’s owners could legally block the protest.

Black Lives Matter demonstrators camped outside a Minneapolis police station for nearly three weeks after a police officer shot Jamar Clark, 24, on Nov. 15.

The death of Clark, who was unarmed, has added fuel to an already heated debate over race and justice in the United States following several such killings across the nation in the past year.

“It’s been sleepless nights,” Jamar’s cousin, Alexander Clark, told Reuters at the mall demonstration just before police took him into custody, adding: “We are here for justice for my cousin.” It was not immediately clear whether Clark had been formally arrested.

Police and mall security quickly moved in, warning any who did not leave would be arrested for violating mall policy against demonstrations and alerting shoppers that that area of the mall was on lockdown. Police forced people in the protest area outside into a light snow.

People also lined the tiers on the three floors above the protest, although it was not clear whether they were involved. Some stores locked their doors ahead of the demonstration.

Wednesday’s short protest marked the second consecutive year that the loosely organized movement, which grew out of protests over police killings in Ferguson, Missouri, New York and other cities, had demonstrated near the peak of the holiday season.

Black Lives Matter officials had promised to assemble at the mall “restraining order or not” and said in a Facebook post late Tuesday, “What happens next will tell us volumes about who we are as a society.”

Just before last Christmas, more than 1,500 Black Lives Matter protesters demonstrating against grand jury decisions not to charge police officers in the killings of unarmed black men in Ferguson, Missouri and New York shut down part of the same mall.

The protest, days after rioting and arson in Ferguson, resulted in the arrests of about two dozen people, mostly for trespassing and failure to disperse.

The night before this year’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade in New York, members of the group marched through Macy’s Herald Square flagship store to show solidarity with the Minneapolis chapter.

Officials with the Mall of America, located in a suburb of Minneapolis, had said they could ban demonstrations on private property as allowed under the law. This week they asked a judge to bar the group, its leaders and others from protesting and require it to delete social media posts advertising the demonstration.

However, Hennepin County Judge Karen Janisch denied a broad temporary restraining order, only barring three leaders of the group from the protest. She warned that the order, which did not extend to the group itself or unnamed people, should not be seen as authorization to protest without the mall’s permission.

(Reporting by David Bailey; Writing by Ben Klayman; Editing by Scott Malone and James Dalgleish)

Photo: Members of the group Black Lives Matter march to city hall during a protest in Minneapolis, Minnesota November 24, 2015. REUTERS/Craig Lassig

Tags:

134 Comments

  1. Otto Greif December 23, 2015

    We should all be grateful to BLM for helping Trump.

    Reply
    1. JPHALL December 23, 2015

      This demonstration does nothing for him. Actually, Democrats are very happy with Trump and wish him success against the rest of the Republican clown car of candidates.

      Reply
    2. SecludedCompound December 24, 2015

      You realize that with this we get a) a movement to call out murderous cops and talk about racial justice and b) Trump as a candidate, being the most incredible thing that a Democratic candidate could want, right?

      This election is going to be a bloody rout.

      Reply
      1. Otto Greif December 27, 2015

        You realize everyone is tired of the monkeys howling?

        Reply
        1. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

          Oh, really, no, most of us are on their sides: it’s your diminishing band of racist, white supremacist conservative Republicans that refer to black people as “monkeys” and then claim that “Democrats are the real racists” that don’t realize the entire world is tired of you and just waiting for you to die off.

          Reply
          1. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            If whites die off there will be no one to feed the monkeys and they will starve.

            Reply
          2. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, not “whites”: old racist white supremacist conservative Republican whites as a political entity. It’s not an “if”, it’s a surety. You’re losing. You are, in fact, dying off, and you know it.

            The rest of us, the plurality of modern, non-neanderthal white folks are perfectly happy living in our multicultural cities, running the economy, living well, and handing out all of that wingnut welfare that you poor backwards people all gobble up in your red states.

            You’re sad, you’re pathetic, and you’re done as a political force. Your dying gasps are such good entertainment though, aren’t they?

            Reply
          3. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            A lot of blacks live in red states. What’s sad and pathetic are white-hating liars like you.

            Reply
          4. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, I don’t hate whites, I hate racist white supremacist conservative republicans like you, see the difference?

            Your hatred is a choice; one dictated by your understanding of your own weakness, sure, but a choice nonetheless. Anybody weak enough to have your point of view deserves any derision that comes their way. Also, it’s beautiful that you just throw your hands up in the air and call me a liar because you can’t do anything else: you know I’m correct. We have your children. We have your wives. We have the future. you’re done.

            Reply
          5. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You have our wives? That’s funny. You guys are doing a great job running Chicago, by the way.

            Reply
          6. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            I love it when white supremacists use the sad example of Chicago, when we actually have every major city int he country outside of, say, Colorado Springs. Every city that generates every penny of value in the nation, including, oh, NYC, SF, LA, Seattle, Boston, Portland, Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix, Philly, Miami ad infinitum. But you pick the one trouble spot that your hateful, diseased mind can pick: Chicago. Are there problems in Chicago? Yep. there have been for decades. Are there a myriad of reasons behind it, including rampant racism in the white power structure there? Yep. De facto segregation and crushing poverty associated with second class citizenship usually does cause problems.

            But again, you’re too stupid to recognize any of this, you just “Ayuh look at the blacks!”, and your brain stops there, because you are an extremely stupid individual.

            Reply
          7. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            San Francisco and Portland are about 6% black, LA 10% black, and Seattle 8% black, bad examples. Explain Baltimore and Birmingham.

            Reply
          8. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Explain what about them? That they’ve historically redlined and segregated blacks into poverty? Yeah, everyone knows that. Bad decisions of past racist generations. We’ll fix it as you losers die off. We’ve always had to deal with the mistakes of stupid white supremacists.

            Reply
          9. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You haven’t “fixed” your pet monkeys in cities controlled by liberals for decades, and you still blame it on white racists.

            Reply
          10. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Of course I blame a history of white supremacist, racist policies such as redlining, defending of services in black neighborhoods and other atrocious white supremacist policies that have recreated the same poverty in black neighborhoods across the eastern seaboard and midwest on white supremacists. Where else would one put that blame?

            Reply
          11. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            “Defending of services in black neighborhoods” means what, exactly? Try to stop babbling.

            Reply
          12. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            “Defunding”. Check your specs, guy. You probably burst a blood-vessel raging stroking at the blacks, hahaha.

            Reply
          13. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hahaha! Right, right, which is why all of the urban areas that overreprresent blacks vis a vis general population don’t drive the economic engines of the country, right? Why aren’t you asking why places where blacks live so productive?

            Reply
          14. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Looks like you’ve gone off your meds, rape apologist.

            Reply
          15. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hey, you’re the one posting white supremacist propaganda because you can;t make any decent arguments, you disgusting white supremacist Republican conservative sadsack.

            Reply
          16. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            That comment wasn’t remotely coherent, science denier.

            Reply
          17. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Sure it was, you’re just avoiding the issue because you’re inept and can’t argue to save your ass.

            Reply
          18. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Learn how to write a coherent comment, science denier.

            Reply
          19. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You mean like all of the coherent ones that you’re simultaneously ignoring and crying about as you spam me, you white supremacist conservative Republican?

            Reply
          20. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            What you call the “white power structure” in Chicago is all liberals.

            Reply
          21. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            No, actually it’s not. It’s been generations of conservative Democrats and machine politicians, which have generally sided with the more conservative elements in society. The idea that anyone would call Rahm Emmanuel or the Chicago PD “liberal” tells you exactly what you need to know about their intelligence, hahaha.

            Reply
          22. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You pretend Democrats aren’t liberals, you pretend Obama’s Jew buddy Rahm Emmanuel is a white conservative, you pretend your pet monkeys don’t rape. Like I said earlier, lying is liberal.

            Reply
          23. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Huh. Let me see here, was it the “liberals” at the DNC in ’68 that were beating up on the protesters? Interesting alternate history you’ve got there, budgie.

            Reply
          24. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            How old are you, science denier? It’s 2015.

            Reply
          25. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Man, you really have lost it, haven;t you? What turned you into this sad, pathetic creature? Black man steal your old lady?

            Reply
          26. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You can pretend facts aren’t facts all you want: the simple truth is, you’ve already lost and there’s nothing you can do to turn that ship around, and you know it.

            We’re laughing all the way to your eventual shuffle off the mortal coil.

            Reply
          27. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You’re a senile old hippy, aren’t you.

            Reply
          28. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, no, I’m a 32 year old white professional on the west coast. I have a way better life than you do, and you’re mad about it because you know you’re inferior to me, so you have to beat up on black people, just like all of you people of subpar intelligence have done for generations.

            Reply
          29. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Democrats are often liberals, they often weren’t in the sixties, as much of the South prior to the Southern Strategy would attest. There are obviously still many Democrats that are not particularly liberal. That anyone would have to state this as a matter of conversation makes me weep for the difference in intelligence that brooks no communication between the educated and their… more simple brethren.

            Reply
          30. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            The sixties were a long time ago, hippy burnout. Shouldn’t you be helping out in your local ghetto?

            Reply
          31. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Interesting. I was born int he 80s, you numskull. Just because you want to fight the battles of your long=past youth doesn’t have any affect on the truth of a given situation. You realize that far more people under thirty-five are liberal than people of the 60s generation, correct? Update your stereotypes, since that’s mainly what you traffic in.

            You’re pathetic.

            Reply
          32. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            And trust me, we have your wives. You’ll see next November.

            Reply
          33. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Romney was a lousy candidate and he got 55% of the married women vote, and 63% of the white married woman vote. You have the spinsters and the welfare sluts.

            Reply
          34. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Wrong. The 2012 vote went 55-D/44-R. You lose. Any amount of cherry picking you want to do won;t make that any better for you. You lose. I love it “spinsters and welfare sluts” as if old people and white trailer trash welfare recipients don’t vote lopsidedly Republican. We have the under-30 female vote 65%/35%. That’s a demographic I’ll take. Say hello to your lady for me.

            It does make you mad that your political clout is next to nil these days, doesn’t it? Sure, Romney was a bad candidate. You don;t have any good candidates because, well, your ideology is based on falsehoods and wishful thinking. Your current crop is a sight worse than Romney, and the numbers will show it. We won by six million votes last time. We’ll win by ten this time.

            The problem is, you need 35% of the Hispanic vote, and you’ll get ~12%. There’s no way you can win.

            Reply
          35. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            That’s a fact, go look at the exit polling data. You’re reality challenged. Republicans don’t need 35% of the Hispanic vote, either, you aren’t good at basic math, obviously.

            Reply
          36. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh sure they do. It’s sad that you people are constantly surprised when you don;t win because you wish that facts weren’t facts, hahaha.

            Reply
          37. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            No they don’t. You’re really stupid.

            Reply
          38. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            And there it is; your big argument in all it’s glory: “No, my falsehoods are worth as much as your facts, shuddup! I’m going home!”

            Hahaha.

            Reply
          39. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            It’s a fact Republicans win the married women vote, and it’s a Republican win without getting 35% of the Hispanic vote.

            Reply
          40. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Which is why i referenced the aforementioned cherry-picking. It is absolutely not a Republican win without 35% of the Republican vote. You can “unskew” the polls all you want. You’ll be disappointed again. You said the same thing last time, and things have only gotten worse for you white supremacist conservative Republicans.

            We have almost all of the women under 35. You’re done this election. You’ll be even worse off the next one, and the trend will continue. Dustbin of history for you, bub.

            Now, don;t go shooting up a Planned Parenthood because you’ve lost it or anything, okay?

            Reply
          41. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            It’s not “cherry picking”, you mistakenly claimed married women vote Democrat, just admit you were wrong and move on, you’re just embarrassing yourself now.

            Reply
          42. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh no, I didn’t claim that married women voted Democrat:: you cherry picked that as your argument and then fought it. I stated that your women are ours. 55/44, bub.

            Say hello to the wife for me. ; )

            Reply
          43. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Jesus, this just keeps getting sadder.

            Anyway, it’s fun knowing that you’ll spend the remainder of your sad, deluded life watching the world slip through your fingers and wondering why nobody values you.

            Reply
          44. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Do your pet monkeys value you? I suspect you don’t actually do anything to help them.

            Reply
          45. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Whatever works for your racist, fevered white supremacist conservative Republican brain, buddy.

            Reply
          46. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            What do you actually do to help them, I’m guessing nothing.

            Reply
          47. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Great argument there, Jethro. Great rhetorical ability. 10/10.

            Reply
          48. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            How come Chicago’s monkeys are so dysfunctional?

            Reply
          49. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hahaha, you can keep spouting hate all day; you still know your political power is next to gone, and you’re just shouting into the void. You’re done. You lost. We won. Your time is over.

            Reply
          50. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            It’s funny you can’t answer the question. You have won Chicago, for decades, yet for some reasons the monkeys there can’t stop shooting each other.

            Reply
          51. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            See, the thing about making false arguments and asking for responses to them is that people that know better don’t pretend that your falsehoods are worthy of argument. If you don;t know your argument is a straw man, then educate yourself. I think you know your argument is a straw man, so I think you’re worthy of nothing but ridicule.

            No false equivalencies between truth and falsehood here, Jethro.

            Back to your trailer.

            Reply
          52. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You obviously don’t even know what a straw man argument is, rape apologist.

            Reply
          53. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, I do. I just stated it, and you refused to respond, because you’re out of your depth, white supremacist conservative Republican.

            Reply
          54. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            It is refreshing to see that you white supremacist conservative Republicans have stopped denying that you conservative Republicans are, in fact, white supremacists and racists. Stopping denying what you are is the first step on the road to recovery. 😉

            Reply
          55. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            I’m not a Republican, and telling the truth isn’t racist. Lying is liberal, however.

            Reply
          56. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Sure you are. Just because you realized you screwed up that branding and now you call yourself an “independent” just like all of your hillbilly Tea Party friends doesn’t mean you’re not a Republican. You all vote Republican and you know it.

            Reply
          57. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Republicans are almost as gay as liberals.

            Reply
          58. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hahaha, you have a lot to prove, don;t you, li’l guy? Almost makes a body think you don;t really measure up.

            Reply
          59. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Serious question: how come you guys can’t your pet monkeys to stop raping?

            Reply
          60. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You have a diseased mind, and you wouldn’t stop to countenance the truth if you had the presence of mind to recognize it. The world will be better without your racist, white supremacist Republican personage around, and you know it, so you rail against the world that doesn’t want or need you.

            Reply
          61. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            The truth is blacks rape a lot.

            Reply
          62. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            About as much as the general population, sure.

            Reply
          63. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Blacks rape at a much higher rate than whites do, rape apologist.

            Reply
          64. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Your problem is that you’re confusing race for poverty. Any population put into the situation that blacks have been forced into has similar crime statistics, including white bumpkin meth heads. You know this, and American Renaissance or whatever white supremacist conservative Republican outlet you got your talking point knows this.

            Problem is, you you’re a liar and you want an easy answer and a scapegoat. Since you hate black people, why not them, right you white supremacist conservative Republican?

            Reply
          65. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Poor whites are nowhere near as criminal as poor blacks. You’re problem is you deny science, facts, and are a rape apologist.

            Reply
          66. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Sure they are. controlling for poverty, there’s simply no difference in crime statistics between the two. Too bad that doesn’t fit your white supremacist conservative Republican worldview, eh?

            Reply
          67. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Stop making things up, rape apologist.

            Reply
          68. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Man, you’re really losing it, aren’t you?

            Reply
          69. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Just stating a fact, rape apologist.

            Reply
          70. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Nah, you’re not, you’re stating falsehood and pretending it’s fact to make yourself feel better about being an abject failure of a human being, white supremacist.

            Reply
          71. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            It’s a fact, ask Barry Obama’s Dept. of Justice.

            Reply
          72. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Does it bother you that nobody likes you or believes your made up garbage? Is that why you rage at the internet all day? I mean, it’s great PR for liberals, so keep it up, Jethro.

            Reply
          73. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            The Dept. of Justice is making things up now? The conspiracy goes all the way to the top, I guess.

            Reply
          74. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            The thing is, if you don’t just make things up out of whole-cloth, you’re busy misrepresenting things. It’s a tactic common to the intellectually weak. Nothing new under the sun.

            Reply
          75. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            It’s pretty funny when yokel, bumpkin white supremacist Republicans try to pretend that they’re superior to anyone though, innit?

            Reply
          76. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Average African American IQ is 85, rape apologist.

            Reply
          77. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hahahaha. Man, don’t downplay someone else’s numbers to make your 90 IQ look good. It’s pretty easy to gauge a person’s IQ by whether or not he still bandies Charles Murray’s debunked study about as if it had any value other than to white supremacist Republican propagandists.

            Reply
          78. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            None of the studies Murray reported on have been debunked, science denier.

            Reply
          79. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Of course they have, numerous times. You probably just ignore it because you want to believe what white supremacists like Murray believe. Thurow thoroughly debunked him thirty years ago, as did Gould and a number of others, and have continued to do so as he’s put out new racist hoax pamphlets.

            It’s truly sad that you would base any of your points of view on work that has so thoroughly been debunked, but then again some of you people still believe in the Protocols, I guess.

            Reply
          80. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, actually, they all have.

            Reply
          81. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Actually none have, science denier.

            Reply
          82. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Gould, Thurow, Willington to name three, but those are just the very famous ones. Good luck with the reading, Jethro! It’s not fourth grade level so you may want to get a few of your yokel buddies to explain the bigger words to you.

            Reply
          83. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Gould never debunked any modern IQ studies. He claimed to have debunked 19th century craniometry, but it turns out he falsified the data.

            Reply
          84. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hey buddy, just because you haven;t read it, doesn’t mean it ain’t out there. Try again. Maybe I can mail you a napkin or two to wipe that egg off of your face, haha.

            Reply
          85. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Unlike you, I have read Mismeasure of Man, which is how I know he never debunked an modern IQ studies. I’ve also read “The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias” by Lewis, DeGusta, et. al., which is how I know Gould had to restor to falsification when he tried to refute 19th century crainometry.

            Reply
          86. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Hey, you found Google, good boy!

            You don’t know anything about what you’re talking about, or you’d realize that the opposite of what you’re saying is accepted science. But hey, I’m sure the whole world is dying to hear your thoughts on white supremacist Charles Murray’s thoughts on why blacks suck, hahaha.

            Reply
          87. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Morton’s findings hold up quite well.

            Reply
          88. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            LOL.

            Reply
          89. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            “The data on cranial capacity gathered by Morton are generally reliable, and he reported them fully. Overall, we find that Morton’s initial reputation as the objectivist of his era was well-deserved.” – The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias.

            Reply
          90. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            LOL.

            Reply
          91. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Jason A. Lewis: Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America. Jason E. Lewis
            Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of AmericaDavid DeGustaPaleoanthropology Institute, Oakland, California, United States of AmericaMarc R. MeyerDepartment of Anthropology, Chaffey College, Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States of AmericaJanet M. MongeDepartment of Anthropology and Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of AmericaAlan E. MannDepartment of Anthropology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of AmericaRalph L. HollowayDepartment of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America

            Reply
          92. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            LOL. The Google search continues!

            Reply
          93. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You’re denying science again, rape apologist.

            Reply
          94. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Right, because Googling something and then copy=pasting a list of names is “denying science”.

            You’re truly a pathetic specimen.

            Reply
          95. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Those scientists examined Morton’s work and concluded his “data on cranial capacity gathered by Morton are generally reliable, and he reported them fully. Overall, we find that Morton’s initial reputation as the objectivist of his era was well-deserved.” You reject what they say because you are science denier.

            Reply
          96. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Why do you reject the most recent review of the whole thing which basically exonerates Gould’s review and shows the inherent bias in Morton’s data parsing?

            Reply
          97. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Oh, nevermind, I know why: confirmation bias.

            Reply
          98. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            All you know is science denial.

            Reply
          99. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Interesting, seeing as how the science around this says that you’re wrong, which is why that’s the consensus opinion among, you know, scientists as opposed to white supremacist conservative Republican internet trolls.

            Reply
          100. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You don’t know what you are talking about, science denier.

            Reply
          101. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Anyway.

            Reply
          102. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            There’s no debunking of modern psychometric to read, IQ findings are supported by decades of peer reviewed research.

            Reply
          103. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Anyway, I guess you can ignore all the science you want to on this: white supremacists have been doing it for generations, so no need for their conservative Republican kin to diverge from their history of ignorance.

            It’s been fun beating up on you, but I’ve gotta say, sometimes the cat gets bored of the mouse.

            Say hi to your wife for me!

            Reply
          104. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Your claims aren’t backed by any science.

            Reply
          105. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Of course it is; all of the sources I stated, that you ignored because you want to keep your racist dogma.

            Reply
          106. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You understand how little weight is given in general to studies of IQ as a rubric altogether, right, as if there was any validity to your criticism anyway?

            Reply
          107. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You understand nothing about this subject, yet you keep babbling.

            Reply
          108. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            The thing is, I know more about than you do, so you consult Google for a few seconds and think your flash-card level of understanding is worthy of consideration. I’m not sure if you think anyone else here actually cares or if your self-esteem is just so bad that you’re willing to lie to yourself, but I’m guessing the latter.

            Anyway, you and I know that you’re full of it. That’s enough for me.

            Reply
          109. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            No, I’m familiar with the scientific research.

            Reply
          110. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            No, you’re not, and you know it, which makes your ego-driven self-delusion all the more sad.

            Oh well, you white supremacist conservative Republicans are nothing if not delusional.

            Anyway, have a nice time aging out and your impending political inconsequence; I’m pretty bored of responding to your nonsense.

            Reply
          111. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            I do have a nice time, there are hardly any monkeys where I live.

            Reply
          112. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You have the brain of an abnormal child.

            Reply
          113. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            I bet you don’t live around monkeys, either. You’re all talk.

            Reply
          114. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            It’s hilarious that your failed arguments have all lead you to making false assumptions about me personally. That should point something out about the weakness of your pathetic attempt at rhetoric, but I assume you won’t learn anything from it.

            Reply
          115. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            It would make me happy if you actually lived around monkeys, but chances are you’re a typical liberal hypocrite.

            Reply
          116. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Anyway…

            Reply
          117. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Man, you’re really going off the deep end with your fake white supremacist statistics, aren’t you? Seems like you’re losing your grip.

            Reply
          118. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Peer reviewed science, science denier.

            Reply
          119. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            No, actually, the peer review is what debunked Murray, you dimwit. Two white supremacists with no statistical training in a room don’t constitute scientific peer review, bud.

            Reply
          120. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            All the white racists left Detroit, how is that working out for your pet monkeys.

            Reply
          121. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            Yep, they sold the jobs to China because they were too stupid to see supply side lies for what they were, and when things got bad, they ran. Lots of problems int he rust belt after globalization. But in your mind: “THE BLACKS.”

            Hahahah. You’re so sad.

            Reply
          122. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You said everything would be great once the whites were gone, but for some reason Detroit isn’t monkey paradise.

            Reply
          123. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            I didn’t say everything would be great once whites were gone, I said everything would be great once older white Supremacist Republican conservatives were gone and the plurality of the rest of us worked with other ethnicities.

            Stop making weak arguments up so that you can beat them instead of my arguments which you’ve shown time and again you don’t have the intellectual fortitude not to back down from.

            Reply
          124. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            Why aren’t you out “fixing” pet monkeys right now? Are you being held back by white supremacists?

            Reply
          125. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You mean fixing the disgusting racist policies that create ghettos and poverty? We’ve been fixing them for years, and of course, it takes time. You people will die off eventually, and then it’ll be easier. You’re doing everything you can to avoid giving black people power now. You won’t be able to for long.

            It would be hilarious if it weren’t so sad that you people screw things up, then point to the results as evidence of someone else’s degeneracy. Luckily, everyone knows who the real degenerates are in this country.

            Reply
          126. Otto Greif December 29, 2015

            You haven’t fixed anything, and no one is preventing you and other liberals from improving the lot of your pet monkeys. When black people get power things get worse, look at Detroit and Baltimore.

            Reply
          127. SecludedCompound December 29, 2015

            You’re losing it, Otto, hahaha.

            Reply
  2. game50 December 24, 2015

    If their lives matter…then stay in school and get and EDUCATION…and. stay Off of government asst..They need to find some Self respect and self worth too. If they don’t like the white man money they need to earn their own and see how far that gets them… Not far…you don’t have a job…thanks to the Fraud in Our W.H..

    Reply
    1. charleo1 December 25, 2015

      “If,” their lives matter? Like they say, Pal. You’re either part of the solution, or part of the problem. If you need to ask “if” Black lives matter, then you are definitely a big part of the problem.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.