The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

In a piece by the Washinton Post editorial board — usually a source for analysis and opinion, not new bombshell facts — the paper dropped a stunning allegation about President Donald Trump that would undoubtedly constitute an impeachable offense.

The piece discussed the White House’s stalling of military funds for Ukraine, a previously reported revelation that I had referred to as “Trump’s latest gift to Putin.” Anything that weakens Ukraine militarily is a boon for the Russian president, naturally, as his forces continue to occupy the illegally annexed region of Crimea.

But the editorial board indicated that it has sources that say Trump’s aim is not to please Putin — or at least, that’s not the sole reason for the delay. It explained:

[We’re] reliably told that the president has a second and more venal agenda: He is attempting to force [Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky] to intervene in the 2020 U.S. presidential election by launching an investigation of the leading Democratic candidate, Joe Biden. Mr. Trump is not just soliciting Ukraine’s help with his presidential campaign; he is using U.S. military aid the country desperately needs in an attempt to extort it.

There are several questions to ask about this. First, in a big journalistic faux pas, this bombshell allegation is written in the passive voice. That allows the editorial board to completely avoid characterizing the source of the information at all, noting only that they’re reliable. Are these administration sources? Sources in the Ukrainian government? Confidants of the president? Confident congressional sources? There’s no indication.

It’s also important to ask why these allegations would appear in an editorial rather than the extremely credible and rigorous reporting arm of The Washington Post. The newspaper has some of the best reporters in the business, and it’s not clear why they wouldn’t be put in charge of verifying these facts. Nevertheless, the editorial board has its own reputation to protect, so its factual claims should be given some weight.

And the allegation comports with other known — and deeply suspicious — facts. Rudy Giuliani has been candid about the fact that he has been trying to pressure Ukraine to go after Biden, in addition wanting the country to investigate how allegations about Paul Manafort’s Ukrainian ties were uncovered during the 2016 campaign. Clearly, Giuliani, with Trump’s tacit, if not outright, support, is following the campaign’s 2016 playbook: smear your enemy by stirring up controversy about an investigation and enlist foreign government’s to help in this effort. Giuliani has even admitted that he had the help of the U.S. State Department in his outreach to Ukraine.

The former New York mayor’s actions were bad enough. A president’s team asking for a foreign government to investigate its political opponent on its own should be a massive scandal. But if Trump is delaying military aid to that government to pressure Ukraine into going after Biden in an effort to affect the 2020 election, that should undoubtedly be considered an impeachable offense.

Of course, Trump has already proven that he can get away with committing myriad impeachable offenses. So what does he have to lose?

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Tyler Matzek

So the World Series has come around again, evoking the usual mixed feelings. For one thing, I don't have a team this year, although I'll be pulling for Atlanta in honor of my friend Lauren, a serious Braves fan I pretty much talked into baseball when she was my student. As a sometime athlete and a serious reader with a taste for complex narratives, she was a natural.

Also, the Houston Astros cheated. Bigtime. Cunning and crude, the team's 2017 electronic sign-stealing, trashcan-banging scheme tipping hitters to incoming pitches could have been designed by Vladimir Putin. It wouldn't have bothered me if several Astros had been banished from baseball like Pete Rose, whose compulsive gambling hurt mainly himself.

Keep reading... Show less

Mark Meadows

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Legal experts including a Harvard professor and a top election and voting rights attorney are weighing in on Sunday night's bombshell report from Rolling Stone naming members of Congress and the Trump administration who were involved in the planning and organizing of the January 6 rally and/or "Trump's efforts to overturn his election loss," according to two of the planners of the "Stop the Steal" rally.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}