The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

by Cora Currier, ProPublica.The big bank settlement over mortgage servicing abuses was finalized last week, detailing at last the agreement’s actual terms.Bank of America, Citigroup, Ally Financial (formerly GMAC), and JP Morgan Chase are together on the hook for billions, which will be divvied up between penalties paid to the federal and state governments, direct payments to homeowners wrongfully foreclosed upon, and credits to the banks for providing “consumer relief.” (Read the government’s complaint, and the banks’ consent judgment.)Here’s a breakdown of the settlement, showing exactly where the money is going, and how much help it will really provide for homeowners.

$1.4 billion: total direct payments from the settlement to homeowners who were wrongfully foreclosed upon between 2008 and 2011.

750,000: number of foreclosed homeowners expected to qualify.

$2,000: estimated average payout.

3.8 million: total number of foreclosures between 2008 and 2011.

25 percent: amount by which the number of foreclosures is expected to rise in 2012. That would mean about a million foreclosures, up from 804,000 last year, partly as a result of banks clearing a backlog held up by the settlement proceedings.

$3 billion: total banks can be credited for offering refinancing to underwater homeowners who owe more than their home is worth. (There are questions about how the exactly credits will work, and why the banks are being given incentives rather than punishment.)

$17 billion: total from the settlement banks can be credited for offering loan modification ($10 billion) and other forms of “consumer relief” ($7 billion) for underwater borrowers2014counted separately from the refinancing incentives.

11.1 million: number of underwater mortgages in the U.S.

$717 billion: total negative equity from those underwater mortgages.

3 million: approximate number of underwater mortgages owned or guaranteed by the government-controlled Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which are not covered by the settlement.

5 percent: portion of the country’s underwater mortgages that might qualify for modification under the settlement, according to an estimate by the Brookings Institute. (Officials have put the number closer to 10 percent).

$10.9 billion: Bank of America total outlay in the settlement, the biggest of any bank.

$2.0 billion: Bank of America fourth quarter 2011 profits.

$1 billion: settlement over allegations that Bank of America passed on bad loans for the Federal Housing Authority to insure. A government audit made public with the settlement showed similar patterns at other banks.

$6 billion: amount that the FHA paid in insurance claims on defaulted mortgages handled by the five banks between 2008 and 2010.

60-200: number of documents signed daily by single employees at Bank of America loan processers, according to the government audit.

12-18 inches: height of the stacks of documents one Bank of America employee signed “without a review.”

$1 million: fine to be levied on the banks for each violation of the terms of the overall settlement, escalating to $5 million for repeat violations. (Exactly how fines will be tallied is still unclear.)

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jessica Cisneros

It’s a race that has some Democratic voters scratching their heads: a young, progressive primary challenger versus a pro-life, conservative Democrat who received an A-rating from the NRA. The primary race between one of the most conservative Democrats in the House, Representative Henry Cuellar, and Jessica Cisneros has become a lightning rod within the Democratic Party.

Cuellar declared victory, but as of Wednesday morning, major media outlets have said the race is too close to call. He is just a couple hundred votes ahead of his Cisneros in Texas' 28th Congressional District primary. When neither candidate won a majority in the March 1 primary, the two highest vote-getters faced each other in Tuesday's run-off election.

Keep reading... Show less

School shooting in Uvalde, Texas

Youtube Screenshot

Fox News responded to the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, by interviewing experts who pushed controversial, counterproductive models to reduce gun violence in schools. One of these experts advocated for introducing more weapons into schools through arming teachers and staff, a policy firmly rejected by teachers unions and researchers. Another called for increased active shooter response trainings-- a service his company provides -- which have also been found to be ineffective at preventing casualties.

As news out of Uvalde was still developing, Fox News’ Jesse Watters invited Laura Carno -- the executive director of FASTER Colorado, which advocates for arming school staff -- on his show, where she compared arming teachers and other school personnel to arming pilots. “We all feel really comfortable with the armed pilot program, where some pilots are armed on some flights,” Carno said. “We don't know which ones, and we feel pretty good about that. It's a very similar kind of thing to armed school staff programs.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}