The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

UPDATE: The rules change passed, 48 to 52. Majority Leader Reid passed the decisive 51st vote.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced on Thursday morning that he will “go nuclear” by changing the Senate rules to end filibusters of President Obama’s executive and judicial nominees, except for the Supreme Court.

The Republican minority has blocked the appointments of Robert Wilkins, Nina Pillard and Patricia Millett, all of the president’s appointments to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, from receiving an up-or-down vote.

All of President George W. Bush’s six appointments to the court — which has jurisdiction over much of the activity of the federal government — were approved by the upper house of Congress. Due to the court’s seniority system, its power is heavily tilted to Republican appointees.

Rather than allowing a vote on the three court vacancies , Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) called for the vacant seats to be removed from the court.

Reid listed a litany of obstruction by Republicans in the Senate, including the unprecedented attempt to use the requirement for 60 votes to eliminate a part of the executive branch, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the attempt to block a Republican nominee for the Secretary of Defense and the successful filibuster of a sitting member of the House of Representatives. More than half of the 168 filibusters in the history of the United States have happened during the Obama administration, he noted. In addition, 75 of Obama’s executive branch nominees are still waiting for confirmation—and they’ve been waiting for 140 days, on average.

Since the Constitution was ratified, 23 district court nominees have been filibustered — 20 of them were nominated by President Obama.

Senate Democrats used this chart to illustrate their point:

filibusters


“The American people think the Senate is broken,” Reid said, before noting that Democrats have played a part in escalating the use of filibusters.

“It’s time to change the Senate before it becomes obsolete,” he said.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) responded to the majority leader’s speech by accusing Democrats of trying to change the subject from the failure of the Affordable Care Act. “If I were a senator from Oregon, for example, which hasn’t enrolled a single person for the Obamacare exchanges, I’d probably want to talk about something else too,” he said.

He got laughs from his Republican colleagues when he said, “If you like your Senate rules, you can keep them,” referencing the president’s promise about the Affordable Care Act.

McConnell suggested again and again that the court in question doesn’t even have enough to do, though its caseload has been steady over the last few decades, when previous presidents had been permitted to fill it.

The minority leader went on to defend Republican actions as being a “check” on the president. “By any objective standard, Senate Republicans have been very, very fair to this president,” he said.

“You may regret this a lot sooner than you think,” he said. After another attempt to confirm Millett failed, McConnell suddenly adjourned the Senate until 5 PM Thursday, which was rejected by the majority of the Senate.

AFP/Alex Wong

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Roe V. Wade being overturned can impact midterm elections

YouTube Screenshot

The fate of abortion rights is now in the hands of voters after the Supreme Court on Friday overturned decades of settled precedent in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that abortion is not a right under the U.S. Constitution.

Now that state legislatures are able to pass bills that restrict abortion, the outcome of elections for governors, attorneys general, and state lawmakers will determine whether abortion remains legal and how draconian bans will be.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}