The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Citing Unprecedented Obstruction, Senate Democrats Go ‘Nuclear’

UPDATE: The rules change passed, 48 to 52. Majority Leader Reid passed the decisive 51st vote.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced on Thursday morning that he will “go nuclear” by changing the Senate rules to end filibusters of President Obama’s executive and judicial nominees, except for the Supreme Court.

The Republican minority has blocked the appointments of Robert Wilkins, Nina Pillard and Patricia Millett, all of the president’s appointments to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, from receiving an up-or-down vote.

All of President George W. Bush’s six appointments to the court — which has jurisdiction over much of the activity of the federal government — were approved by the upper house of Congress. Due to the court’s seniority system, its power is heavily tilted to Republican appointees.

Rather than allowing a vote on the three court vacancies , Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) called for the vacant seats to be removed from the court.

Reid listed a litany of obstruction by Republicans in the Senate, including the unprecedented attempt to use the requirement for 60 votes to eliminate a part of the executive branch, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the attempt to block a Republican nominee for the Secretary of Defense and the successful filibuster of a sitting member of the House of Representatives. More than half of the 168 filibusters in the history of the United States have happened during the Obama administration, he noted. In addition, 75 of Obama’s executive branch nominees are still waiting for confirmation—and they’ve been waiting for 140 days, on average.

Since the Constitution was ratified, 23 district court nominees have been filibustered — 20 of them were nominated by President Obama.

Senate Democrats used this chart to illustrate their point:

filibusters


“The American people think the Senate is broken,” Reid said, before noting that Democrats have played a part in escalating the use of filibusters.

“It’s time to change the Senate before it becomes obsolete,” he said.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) responded to the majority leader’s speech by accusing Democrats of trying to change the subject from the failure of the Affordable Care Act. “If I were a senator from Oregon, for example, which hasn’t enrolled a single person for the Obamacare exchanges, I’d probably want to talk about something else too,” he said.

He got laughs from his Republican colleagues when he said, “If you like your Senate rules, you can keep them,” referencing the president’s promise about the Affordable Care Act.

McConnell suggested again and again that the court in question doesn’t even have enough to do, though its caseload has been steady over the last few decades, when previous presidents had been permitted to fill it.

The minority leader went on to defend Republican actions as being a “check” on the president. “By any objective standard, Senate Republicans have been very, very fair to this president,” he said.

“You may regret this a lot sooner than you think,” he said. After another attempt to confirm Millett failed, McConnell suddenly adjourned the Senate until 5 PM Thursday, which was rejected by the majority of the Senate.

AFP/Alex Wong

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}