Type to search

Sunoco, Behind Protested Dakota Pipeline, Tops U.S. Crude Spill Charts

Headlines Health Infrastructure National News

Sunoco, Behind Protested Dakota Pipeline, Tops U.S. Crude Spill Charts

Share
DAPL, Dakota Access, Oil

HOUSTON (Reuters) – Sunoco Logistics <SXL.N>, the future operator of the oil pipeline delayed this month after Native American protests in North Dakota, spills crude more often than any of its competitors with more than 200 leaks since 2010, according to a Reuters analysis of government data.

The lands of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe sit a half mile south of the proposed route of the Dakota Access pipeline. The tribe fears the line could destroy sacred sites during construction and that a future oil spill might pollute its drinking water.

A tribal protest over the $3.7 billion project drew broad support from other Native American tribes, domestic and international environmental groups and Hollywood celebrities.

In response to the tribe’s objections, the U.S. government earlier this month called for a temporary halt to construction along a section of the 1,100 mile line in North Dakota near the Missouri River.

While environmental concerns are at the heart of the Standing Rock Sioux protest, there is no reference to the frequency of leaks by Sunoco or its parent Energy Transfer Partners <ETP.N> in a legal complaint filed by the tribe, nor has Sunoco’s spill record informed the public debate on the line.

Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II told Reuters the tribe was aware of the safety record of Energy Transfer, but declined to elaborate.

Sunoco Logistics is one of the largest pipeline operators in the United States. Energy Transfer is constructing the Dakota Access pipeline to pump crude produced at North Dakota’s Bakken shale fields to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Once completed, it will hand over the pipeline’s operation to Sunoco.

Sunoco acknowledged the data and told Reuters it had taken measures to reduce its spill rate.

“Since the current leadership team took over in 2012, Sunoco Pipeline has enhanced and improved our integrity management program,” Sunoco spokesman Jeffrey Shields told Reuters by email.

This significantly cut the amount of barrels lost during incidents, he said.

The U.S. Department of Justice did not make any reference to the company’s spill rate when it decided to stall the project. It highlighted the need for reform in the way companies building infrastructure consult with Native American tribes.

Spokespeople for the Departments of Justice and the Interior, and the Army Corps declined to comment to Reuters on whether they were aware of Energy Transfer’s leak statistics when they jointly decided to halt construction of the line.

HIGH SPILL RATE

Reuters analyzed data that companies are obliged to disclose to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) when they suffer spills and found that Sunoco leaked crude from onshore pipelines at least 203 times over the last six years.

PHMSA data became more detailed in 2010. In its examination, Reuters tallied leaks in the past six years along dedicated onshore crude oil lines and excluded systems that carry natural gas and refined products. The Sunoco data include two of its pipeline units, the West Texas Gulf and Mid-Valley Pipeline.

That made it the operator with the highest number of crude leak incidents, ahead of at least 190 recorded by Enterprise Products Partners <EPD.N> and 167 by Plains All American Pipeline <PAA.N>, according to the spill data reported to PHMSA, which is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Enterprise said it has comprehensive safety and integrity programs in place and that many spills happened at its terminals.

Sunoco and Enterprise both said most leaks take place within company facilities and are therefore contained.

Plains All American did not respond to a request for comment.

Sunoco’s spill rate shows protestors may have reason to be concerned about potential leaks.

The main option that was considered for routing the line away from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe reservation was previously discarded because it would involve crossing more water-sensitive areas north of the capital Bismarck, according to the project’s environmental assessment.

To be sure, most pipeline spills are small and pipelines are widely seen as a safer way to move fuel than alternatives such as rail.

Sunoco and its units leaked a total of 3,406 net barrels of crude in all the leaks over the last six years, only a fraction of the more than 3 million barrels lost in the largest spill in U.S. history, BP Plc’s <BP.L> Macondo well disaster in 2010.

Sunoco said it found that crude lines not in constant use were a significant source of leaks, so it had shut or repaired some of those arteries.

In 2015, 71 percent of pipeline incidents were contained within the operator’s facility, according to a report by the Association of Oil Pipe Lines, a trade group.

While total pipeline incidents have increased by 31 percent in the last five years, large spills of 500 barrels or more are down by 32 percent over the same time, the report said.

Sunoco accounted for about 8 percent of the more than 2,600 reported liquids pipeline leaks in the past six years in the United States.

SAFETY OVERHAUL

The company has made previous efforts to improve safety, a former Sunoco employee who declined to be identified said. It overhauled safety culture after a spill in 2000, and did so again another in 2005 that dumped some 6,000 barrels of crude into the Kentucky River from its Mid-Valley Pipeline.

Sunoco acknowledged that some of its pipeline equipment dates back to the 1950s.

A 2014 corrective measure regulators issued for Sunoco’s Mid-Valley Pipeline cited “some history of internal corrosion failures” as a potential factor in a leak that sent crude into a Louisiana bayou near an area used for drinking water.

Crude spills on Sunoco’s lines in 2009 and 2011 drew a rebuke from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in a settlement announced this year.

The EPA said the settlement aimed to “improve the safety of Sunoco’s practices and to enhance its oil spill preparedness and response.”

In September, Sunoco received another corrective measure for its newly constructed Permian Express II line in Texas, which leaked 800 barrels of oil earlier this month. The company is already contesting a proposed $1.3 million fine from regulators for violations related to welding on that line.

(Additional reporting by Ernest Scheyder; Editing By Terry Wade, Simon Webb and Edward Tobin)

Photo: Signs left by protesters demonstrating against the Energy Transfer Partners Dakota Access oil pipeline sit at the gate of a construction access road where construction has been stopped for several weeks due to the protests near the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, U.S. September 6, 2016.  REUTERS/Andrew Cullen

Tags:

10 Comments

  1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth September 23, 2016

    So much for dealing with Sunoco and its subsidiaries. Sunoco exec’s will either do the right thing and cease this demand to desecrate Native American sites, divert attention to developing alternative energy sources through R&D, or they’ll just blow it off and defile the environment even more in order to line their pockets.
    The gut instinct is that they’ll choose the greed route and use the lame worn-out mantra of providing jobs and dirty energy, while destroying the water, land, and air.
    (Drill Baby, Drill?)

    Reply
    1. Wayneo September 23, 2016

      The rise of green energy will reduce the need of dirty fossil fuels. The investment in the pipe line will not be profitable.

      Reply
      1. Darlenekdavenport1 September 24, 2016

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj295d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !mj295d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash295DirectWorldGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj295d:….,….

        Reply
      2. jmprint September 24, 2016

        But sure to leak into the waters and ruin civilization.

        Reply
  2. ivory69690@yahoo.com September 24, 2016

    the country dose not need the oil that will run through the pipeline . its just these greedy bastard rich that want this for them self’s . these big oil company’s just want to use and turn the USA into a toilet bowl . no really worse then that a bowl one can just flush it away . what thy want is problem to set on top of the land and never go away . who’s to say if this is what the greedy bastards want ? it dosent matter for thy don’t care it’s just the money . thy say thy will clean up any damage . what like the gulf of Mexico ? it will never be the same . even today all the trash oil thy sunk to the bottom of the ocean is still there . doing damage more and more every day . what money thy do put up to fix and clean up dosent even come close to the damage that’s done and its still not fixed just because one cant see the damage with their eyes (because its at the bottom of the sea ) thy still haven’t taken care of all the peoples life thy destroyed . even at that thy only seek better deal for them self’s money wise . what happen on the lower EAST COAST with that gas leak problem will (only a matter of time ) happen right down the middle of the country of the USA never to be fixed like the gulf coast forever damaged . Canada and the oil company’s keep and clean your trash oils slug there . send and make the pipeline go north Canada pipe it to places in Russia that need it . the USA dose not need the oil and for the companys to make money by piping it right in the middle of our country you cant give us enough money for your trash . ( either way thy don’t want and wouldn’t give the money to the country anyway for thy are too much of greedy bastard rich POS that are pretty much like DONNY DUMP only caring about them self ant their bottom line

    Reply
  3. Jon September 24, 2016

    There’s a fair solution to the issue if the politicians continue to do the bidding of big oil. Instead of showing disrespect for Native Americans legitimate concerns, reroute the pipeline through or adjacent to the properties owned by the politicians they own and who support their damage to the environment.

    Reply
    1. kathleen.stella September 25, 2016

      I am gaining something like six to eight thousand bucks on monthly basis with an internet task. For anyone prepared to work simple computer-based task for 2h-5h every day at your home and get valuable benefit in the same time… This is an opportunity for you… http://korta.nu/NDe

      Reply
  4. ashle.furey September 29, 2016

    I currently benefit approximately 6,000-8,000 dollars every month from freelancing on internet. For those of you who are considering to finish easy online tasks for 2h-5h every day from your house and make solid salary for doing it… Then this golden opportunity is for you… http://korta.nu/NDe

    Reply
  5. teresa_mitchell_91 October 1, 2016

    I usually get paid in the span of 6-8 thousand bucks monthly for freelance tasks i do at home. Those who are considering to finish simple computer-based task for 2-5 hrs a day at your house and get valuable checks for doing it… Then this task is for you… http://korta.nu/NDe

    Reply
  6. Lotus Joan October 6, 2016

    How did this project and this company qualify for fast track approval? Why would we fast track approve a pipeline this long carrying a substance as toxic as shale field crude, which, by the way, has currently has no effective. spill clean up proceedure? ( ask residences along the Kalamazoo river about that!) The proposed route will take it under the mighty Mississippi river; a large spill, affecting the river,would be economically, environmentally, and socially devastating to multiple states, communities, and industries. We need to do the studies, environmental and economic, we need to know what we risk vrs what we could reasonably gain. We need to look very closely at this companies risk management policies, plans and history. After those studies are done, I anticipate that most thinking, thoughtful people will conclude that the rewards are exclusively to the pipeline owner’s while the unproportionaly high risks will accrue to the citizens and taxpayers. I urge all concerned to call or write the President and all who are able to help support the tribe’s effort you can donate directly to the tribe on line.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.